POSSIBILITIES OF MODERN NUCLEAR AND RADIATION DIAGNOSIS IN METASTATIC BREAST CANCER: LITERATURE REVIEW

The article provides an overview of the literature data on contemporary methods of radiation diagnosis of metastatic breast cancer.

Introduction: The review deals with the diagnosis of metastatic breast cancer, which is characterized by malignancy, early and rapid lymphogenous and hematogenous metastasis, poor long-term results. Modern data results timely diagnosis and radiation efficiency of applied methods of diagnosis for this pathology.

The purpose of the analysis of published data on the modern methods of diagnosis of metastatic breast cancer. The purpose of the literature search was to find and analyze the literature on modern methods of diagnosis of metastatic breast cancer.

Materials and Methods: In order to accomplish the goal we searched publications in the following databases: PubMed Medline, Health star, Embase, Cochrane, with the help of the scientific search engine Google Scholar.

Results: There are different opinions of the authors of the sequence of diagnosis of metastatic breast cancer. Therefore, there is need for research to develop optimal algorithm integrated radiotherapy and nuclear diagnostic in metastatic breast cancer lesions.

Conclusions: The issues of determining effective schemes of examination of patients, allowing in a short time, with minimal cost to obtain reliable information on the metastatic process, its prevalence and complications with the ability to monitor the dynamics of the process are still relevant.

T. A. Adylhanov1, A. A. Abiltaeva2, A. S. Baysalbaeva2

 State Medical University of Semey, Kazakhstan

Department of Oncology and Imaging diagnosis

1Scientific supervisor, MD, Professor;

2PhD student by specialty "medecine"

Список литературы:
1.    Абдураимов А. Б. Мультиспиральная компьютерная томография в комплексной диагностике опухолей молочной железы: дис. …канд. мед. наук., 2006. 93 с.
2.    Абдураимов А. Б., Араблинский А. В., Леонова Н. Ю., Белышева Е. С. Возможности применения мультиспиралньной компьютер-ной томографии с внутривенным контрасти-рованием в диагностике инфильтративно-отечной формы рака молочной железы // Материалы Всероссийского конгресса лучевых диагностов. ГОУ ВПО Московская Медицинская Академия им. И.М. Сеченова, 2007. С.12.
3.    Ахадов Т. А., Панов В. О., Айххоф Ф. У. Магнитно-резонансная томография спинного мозга и позвоночника. Москва, 2000. С. 334-335.
4.    Важенин А. В., Афанасьева Н. Г., Важенина Д. А., Зотова А. С., Супрончук Н. В., Ваганов Н. В., Калантаев Д. Б., Чащухин Д. Н., Трофимов Д. В., Варенникова А. А., Озеров Е. А. Региональный центр позитронной эмиссион-ной томографии: оценка первоначальных результатов работы // Российский онкологический журнал. 2012. №3. С. 30-31.
5.    Зубарев А. В. Диагностический ультра-звук. Костно-мышечная система. М.:ООО «Фирма-Стром», 2002. С. 5-31.
6.    Калантаев Д. Б. Место радионуклидной диагностики в алгоритме раннего выявления костных метастазов рака легкого, молочной и предстательной железы: дис. … канд. мед. наук. Уфа, 2006. С.13-40.
7.    Карельская Е. A. Компьютерная томо-графия в диагностике метастатических изменений в легких при раке молочной железы: дис.канд.мед.наук. Санкт-Петербург, 2006. 129с.
8.    Корниенко В. Н., Пронин И. Н. Диагнос-тическая нейрорадиология. Москва, 2006. С.1263-1269.
9.    Корниенко В. Н., Коновалов А. Н., Компьютерная томография в нейрохирур-гической клинике. Москва, 1985. C.293.
10. Комаров И. Г., Комов Д. В. Метастазы злокачественных опухолей без выявленного первичного очага. М.: Триада-Х, 2002. С.13-60.
11. Крживицский П. И. Клинико-лучевая диагностика метастатического поражения скелета // Практическая онкология. 2011. Т.12, №3. 107 с.
12. Нуднов Н. В., Сергеенкова Т. Г., Хорикова E. H. и др. Комплексная диагностика заболеваний молочной железы // Медицинская визуализация. 2000. №4. С. 46-53.
13. Маковкин Д. В. Экономические аспекты состояния маммологической службы Российс-кой Федерации в 1998-2001гг // Медицинская визуализация. 2003. №1. С.63-67.
14. Попов О. С., Плечев В. В., Попова О. В. Маммопластика при нарушениях объема и формы молочной железы. М.: 2002. С. 176.
15. Прокоп М., Галански М. Спиральная и многослойная компьютерная томография: Учебн. Пособоие: В 2 т.; Пер. с англ.; Под ред. А.В. Зубарева, Ш.Ш. Шотемора. М.: МЕДпресс-информ, 2006-2007. Т.2. С. 629-631.
16. Рейнберг С. А. Рентгенодиагностика заболеваний костей и суставов: в 2 т. М.: Медицина, 1964. С. 461-476.
17. Сафаров Б. И., Олюшин В. Е., Берснев В. П., Улитин А. Ю. Метастатическое пораже-ние головного мозга // Материалы третьего съезда нейрохирургов Украины. 2003. С. 137.
18. Соколова В. А. Магнитно-резонансная томография в диагностике и мониторинге метастатических опухолей позвоночника после лучевой терапии // Вестник РНЦРР МЗРФ 2009. N9.http://vestnik.rncrr.ru/vestnik/v9/papers/sokolova_v9.htm. (дата обращения: 03.05.2014)
19. Харченко В. П., Котляров П. М., Сергеев Н. И. МРТ в диагностике метастати-ческого поражения костного скелета и оценке эффективности их лечения // Материалы Всероссийского конгресса лучевых диагностов. Москва, 2007. С. 334-335.
20. Шотемор Ш. Ш. Путеводитель по диагностическим изображениям (показания, возможности, пределы). Справочник практи-ческого врача. М.:Сов.спорт, 2001. С-396.
21. Abe K., Sasaki M., Kuwabara Y. et al. Comparison of 18FDGPET with 99mTcHDMP scintigraphy for the detection of bone metastases in patients with breast cancer // Ann. Nucl. Med.2005. Vol.19. P.573-579.
22. Aboagye E. O., Price P. M. Use of positron emission tomography in anticancer drug development // Invest New Drugs. 2003. Vol. 21, №2. P.169-181.
23. Aukema T. S., Rutgers Th E. J., Vogel W. V., Teertstra H. J., Oldenburg H. S. et al. The role of FDG PET/CT in patients with locoregional breast cancer recurrence: a comparison to conventional technique // EJSO. 2010. Vol. 36. Р. 387-392.
24. Bury T., Barreto A., Daenen F. et al. Fluorine-18 deoxyglucose positron emission tomography for the detection of bone metastases in patients with non-small cell lung cancer // Eur. J. Nucl. Med. 1998. Vol. 25. P. 1244-1247.
25. Carol DeSantis., Jiemin Ma., Leah Bryan Ahmedin Jemal. Breast cancer statistics for 2013 // CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians. 2014. Vol. 64, №1. Р. 52-62.
26. Dirisamer A., Halpern B. S., Flöry D., Wolf F., Beheshti M., Mayerhoefer M. E. et al. Integrated contrast-enhanced diagnostic whole-body PET/CT as a first-line restaging modality in patients with suspected metastatic recurrence of breast cancer // Euro. J. Radiol. 2010. Vol.73, P. 294–299.
27. Eubank W B., Mankoff D., Bhattacharya M et al. Impact of FDG PET on defining the extent of disease and on the treatment of patients with recurrent or metastatic breast cancer // Am. J. Roentgenol. 2004. Vol. 183, №2. P. 479-486.
28. Ferlay J., Steliarova-Foucher E., Lortet-Tieulent J., Rosso S., Coebergh. J. W. W., Comber H., Forman D., Bray F. Cancer incidence and mortality patterns in Europe: Estimates for 40 countries in 2012 // European Journal of Cancer. 2013. Vol. 49, № 6. P. 1374-1403.
29. Flanagan F. L., Dehdashti F, Siegel B. A. PET in breast cancer // Semin Nucl Med. 1998.P. 290–302.
30. Gallowitsch H. J., Kresnik E., Gasser J et al. F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in the diagnosis of tumour recurrence and metastases in the follow-up of patients with breast carcinoma; a comparison to conventional imaging // Invest Radiol.2003. №38.P. 250-256.
31. Kamel E. M., Wyss M. T., Fehr M. K., von Schulthess G. K., Goerres G. W. [18F]-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in patients with suspected recurrence of breast cancer // J. Cancer. Res. Clin. Oncol. 2003. Vol. 129, №3. P.147-153.
32. Lecouvet F. E., Geukens D., Stainier A. et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of the axial skeleton for detecting bone metastases in patients with high-risk prostate cancer: diagnostic and cost-effectiveness and comparison with current detection strategies // J. Clin. Oncol. 2008. Vol. 26, № 7. P. 1189-1190.
33. Linden A., Reusch K., Smolarz K., Jungehulsing M. Retro-stemal lymph node metastases in breast cancer: lym-phoscintigraphy and magnetic resonance tomography // J. Clin. Oncol. 2001. №8. P. 3516-3523.
34. Manohar K., Mittal B. R., Senthil R., Kashyap R., Bhattacharya A., Singh G. Clinical utility of F-18 FDG PET/CT in recurrent breast carcinoma // Nucl. Med. Commun.2012.Vol. 33, №6.P .591–596.
35. Mathieu I., Mazy S., Willemart B. et al. Inconclusive triple diagnosis in breast cancer imaging: is there a place for scintimammography? // J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging. 2005. Vol. 46. P.1574 -1581.
36. Moon D. H., Maddahi J., Silverman D. H., Glaspy J. A., Phelps M. E., Hoh C. K. Accuracy of whole-body fluorine-18-FDG PET for the detection of recurrent or metastatic breast carcinoma // J. Nucl. Med. 1998. Vol. 39, №3. P. 431-435.
37. Moon D. H., Phelps M. E., Hoh C. K. Viability assessment with MRI is superior to FDG-PET for viability // J. Nucl. Car. 2010. Vol.17. №2. P.292.
38. Nieweg O. E., Rijk M. C., Olmos R. A. V., Hoefnagel C. A. Sentinel node biopsy and selective lymph node clearance – impact on regional control and survival in breast cancer and melanoma // J. Nucl. Med. 2005. Vol.32. P. 631-634.
39. Nomori H., Watanabe K., Ohtsuka T. et al. Visual and semiquantitative analyses for F-18 fluorodcoxyglucose PET scanning in pulmonary nodules 1 cm to 3 cm in size // Ann.Thorac.Surg.2005.Vol.79.P.984-988.
40. Paik S. H., Chung M. J., Park J. S. High-resolution sonography of the rib: can fracture and metastasis be differentiated? // Am.J.Roentgenol.2005.Vol.184, №3.P.969-974.
41. Sadako Akashi-Tanaka., Takashi Fukutomi., Natsuko Sato., Kunihisa Miyakawa. The role of computed tomography in the selection of breast cancer treatment // Breast Cancer. 2003. Vol. 10, №3. P. 198-203.
42. Schmidt G. P., Baur-Melnyk А., Tiling R., Hahn K. et al. Comparison of high resolution whole-body MRI using parallel imaging and PET-CT. First experiences with a 32-channel MRI system // Radiologe. 2004. Vol. 44, № 9. P. 889-898.
43. Schmidt G. P., Baur-Melnyk A., Haug А. et al. Comprehensive imaging of tumor recurrence in breast cancer patients using whole-body MRI at 1.5 and 3 T compared to FDG-PET-CT // Eur. J. Radiol. 2008. Vol. 65, №1. P. 47-58.
44. Tran A., Pio B. S., Khatibi B., Czernin J., Phelps M. E., Silverman D. H. 18F-FDG PET for staging breast cancer in patients with inner-quadrant versus outer-quadrant tumors: comparison with long-term clinical outcome // J. Nucl. Med. 2005. Vol.46, №9. P. 1455-1459.
45. Vranjesevic D., Filmont J. E., Meta J. et al. Whole-body (18)F-FDG PET and conventional imaging for predicting outcome in previously treated breast cancer patients // J. Nucl. Med. 2002. Vol. 43, №3. P. 325–329.
46. Wirth A., Seymour J. F., Hicks R. J et al. Fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucosc positron emission tomography, gallium-67 scintigraphy, and conventional staging for Hodgkin's disease and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma // Am. J. Med. 2002. Vol. 112. Р. 262-268.  
References:
1.    Abduraimov. A. B. Mul'tispiral'naya kom-p'yuternaya tomografiya v kompleksnoi diagnos-tike opukholei molochnoi zhelezy: (kand. diss.) [Multislice computed tomography in the diagnosis of breast cancer: Doct. Diss.]. Moscow, 2006. 93 p.
2.    Abduraimov A. B., Arablinskii A. V., Leonova N. Yu., Belysheva E. S. Vozmozhnosti primeneniya mul'tispiraln'noi komp'yuternoi tomografii s vnutrivennym kontrastirovaniem v diagnostike infil'trativno-otechnoi formy raka molochnoi zhelezy [Applications for MCT with intravenous contrast in the diagnosis of edematous infiltrative forms of breast cancer]. Materialy Vserossiiskogo kongressa luchevykh diagnostov. GOU VPO Moskovskaya Meditsinskaya Akademiya im. I.M. Sechenova [Proceedings of the All-Russian Congress X-ray diagnosticians. Sechenov Moscow Medical Academy. IM Sechenov] 2007.P.12.
3.    Akhadov T. A., Panov V. O., Aikhkhof F. U. Magnitno-rezonansnaya tomografiya spinnogo mozga i pozvonochnika [Magnetic resonance imaging of the spinal cord and spinal column]. Moscow, 2000. P. 334-335.
4.    Vazhenin A. V., Afanas'eva N. G., Vazhenina D. A., Zotova A. S., Supronchuk N. V., Vaganov N. V., Kalantaev D. B., Chashchukhin D. N., Trofimov D. V., Varennikova A. A., Ozerov E. A. Regional'nyi tsentr pozitronnoi emissionnoi tomografii: otsenka pervonachal'nykh rezul'tatov raboty [Regional Centre for positron emission tomography: evaluation of initial results]. Ros. Onk. zhurnal. [Russian Journal of Oncology] 2012. №3. P.30-31.
5.    Zubarev A. V. Diagnosticheskii ul'trazvuk. Kostno-myshechnaya sistema [Diagnostic ultrasound. Musculoskeletal system]. M: OOO «Firma-Strom», 2002.P.5-31. [in Russian]
6.    Kalantaev D. B. Mesto radionuklidnoi diagnostiki v algoritme rannego vyyavleniya kostnykh metastazov raka legkogo, molochnoi i predstatel'noi zhelezy: dis. …cand. med. nauk [The role of radionuclide diagnostic algorithm for early detection of bone metastases of lung cancer, breast and prostate cancer: Cand. Diss.]. Ufa, 2006. P.13-40.
7.    Karel'skaya E. A. Komp'yuternaya tomografiya v diagnostike metastaticheskikh izmenenii v legkikh pri rake molochnoi zhelezy: dis. …cand. med. nauk [Computed tomography in the diagnosis of metastatic lung changes in breast cancer: Cand. Diss.]. Sankt-Peterburg, 2006. 129p.
8.    Kornienko V. N., Pronin I. N. Diagnosti-cheskaya neiroradiologiya [Diagnostic Neuro-radiology]. Moscow, 2006. P.1263-1277.
9.    Kornienko V. N., Pronin I. N., Komp'yuternaya tomografiya v neirokhirurgichsekoi klinike [Computed tomography in neurosurgical clinic]. Moscow. 1985. C.293.
10. Komarov I. G., Komov D. V. Metastazy zlokachestvennykh opukholei bez vyyavlennogo pervichnogo ochaga [Metastases of malignant tumors revealed no primary lesion]. M.: Triada-Х, 2002. P. 13-60. [in Russian]
11. Krzhivitsskii P. I. Kliniko-luchevaya diagnostika metastaticheskogo porazheniya skeletal [Clinical ray diagnosis of metastatic lesions of the skeleton]. Prakticheskaya onkologiya [Practical oncology]. 2011, T.12, №3. P.107. [in Russian]
12. Nudnov N. V., Sergeenkova T. G., Khorikova E. H. i dr. Kompleksnaya diagnostika zabolevanii molochnoi zhelezy [Complex diagnostics of breast diseases]. Meditsinskaya vizualizatsiya [Medical visualization] 2000.№4.P. 46-53. [in Russian]
13. Makovkin D.V. Ekonomicheskie aspekty sostoyaniya mammologicheskoi sluzhby RF v 1998-2001gg. [Economic aspects of the state of the Breast Service of Russia in 1998-2001] Meditsinskaya vizualizatsiya [Medical visualization] 2003.№1.P.63-67. [in Russian].
14. Popov O. S., Plechev V. V., Popova O. V. Mammoplastika pri narusheniyakh ob"ema i formy molochnoi zhelezy [Breast Implants for violations of the volume and shape of the breast]. M.: 2002. P. 176. [in Russian]
15. Prokop M., Galanski M. Spiral'naya i mnogosloinaya komp'yuternaya tomografiya [Multilayer and spiral computed tomography]. Uchebn. Posoboie [Study guidelains, translation from English by redaction A.V. Zubareva, Sh.Sh. Shotemora]. M.: MEDpress-inform, 2006-2007. T.2. P. 629-631. [in Russian]
16. Reinberg S. A. Rentgenodiagnostika zabolevanii kostei i sustavov [Radiology bone and joint diseases]. v 2 t. M.: Meditsina [Medicine], 1964. P.461-476. [in Russian].
17. Safarov B. I., Olyushin V. E., Bersnev V. P., Ulitin A. Yu. Metastaticheskoe porazhenie golovnogo mozga [Metastatic brain damage]. Materialy tret'ego s"ezda neirokhirurgov Ukrainy [Materials of III congress of neurosurgeon of Ukraine]. 2003. P. 137.
18. Sokolova V. A. Magnitno-rezonansnaya tomografiya v diagnostike i monitoringe metastaticheskikh opukholei pozvonochnika posle luchevoi terapii [Magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis and monitoring of metastatic tumors of the spine after radiotherapy]. Vestnik RNTsRR MZ RF [Vestnik.rncrr.ru MH RF] 2009. N9. http://vestnik.rncrr.ru/vestnik/v9/papers/sokolova_v9.htm. [The date of circulation 03.05.2014] [in Russian]
19. Kharchenko V. P., Kotlyarov P. M., Sergeev N. I. MRT v diagnostike metastaticheskogo porazheniya kostnogo skeleta i otsenke effektivnosti ikh lecheniya [MRI in the diagnosis of metastatic skeletal lesions and evaluating the effectiveness of their treatment]. Materialy Vserossiiskogo kongressa luchevykh diagnostov [Materials of All-Russion congress of Radiologists] Moscow, 2007. P. 334-335.
20. Shotemor Sh. Sh. Putevoditel' po diagnosticheskim izobrazheniyam i pokazaniya, vozmozhnosti, predely. Spravochnik prakticheskogo vracha [Guide to diagnostic imaging (readings possible limits) Directory of Practitioners]. M.: Sov.sport, 2001. P.396.
21. Abe K., Sasaki M., Kuwabara Y. et al. Comparison of 18FDGPET with 99mTcHDMP scintigraphy for the detection of bone metastases in patients with breast cancer. Ann. Nucl. Med. 2005. Vol.19. P.573-579.
22. Aboagye E. O., Price P. M. Use of positron emission tomography in anticancer drug development. Invest New Drugs. 2003. Vol. 21, №2. P.169-181.
23. Aukema T. S., Rutgers Th E. J., Vogel W. V., Teertstra H. J., Oldenburg H. S. et al. The role of FDG PET/CT in patients with locoregional breast cancer recurrence: a comparison to conventional technique. E J S O. 2010. Vol. 36. P. 387-392.
24. Bury T., Barreto A., Daenen F., et al. Fluorine-18 deoxyglucose positron emission tomography for the detection of bone metastases in patients with non-small cell lung cancer. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. 1998. Vol. 25. P.1244-1247.
25. Carol DeSantis., Jiemin Ma., Leah Bryan, Ahmedin Jemal. Breast cancer statistics for 2013. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians. 2014. Vol. 64, №1. R. 52-62.
26. Dirisamer A., Halpern B. S., Flöry D., Wolf F., Beheshti M., Mayerhoefer M. E. et al. Integrated contrast-enhanced diagnostic whole-body PET/CT as a first-line restaging modality in patients with suspected metastatic recurrence of breast cancer. Euro. J. Radiol. 2010. Vol. 73. P. 294–299.
27. Eubank W B., Mankoff D., Bhattacharya M. et al. Impact of FDG PET on defining the extent of disease and on the treatment of patients with recurrent or metastatic breast cancer. Am. J. Roentgenol. 2004. Vol. 183, №2. P. 479-486.
28. Ferlay J., Steliarova-Foucher E., Lortet-Tieulent J., Rosso S., Coebergh. J. W. W., Comber H., Forman D., Bray F. Cancer incidence and mortality patterns in Europe: Estimates for 40 countries in 2012. European Journal of Cancer. 2013. Vol. 49, № 6. P. 1374-1403.
29. Flanagan F. L., Dehdashti F, Siegel B. A. PET in breast cancer. Semin Nucl Med. 1998. P. 290–302.
30. Gallowitsch H. J., Kresnik E., Gasser J et al. F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in the diagnosis of tumour recurrence and metastases in the follow-up of patients with breast carcinoma; a comparison to conventional imaging. Invest Radiol. 2003. №38. P. 250-256.
31. Kamel E. M., Wyss M. T., Fehr M. K., von Schulthess G. K., Goerres G. W. [18F]-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in patients with suspected recurrence of breast cancer. J. Cancer. Res. Clin. Oncol. 2003. Vol. 129, №3. P. 147-153.
32. Lecouvet F. E., Geukens D., Stainier A et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of the axial skeleton for detecting bone metastases in patients with high-risk prostate cancer: diagnostic and cost-effectiveness and comparison with current detection strategies. J. Clin. Oncol. 2008. Vol. 26, № 7. P. 1189-1190.
33. Linden A., Reusch K., Smolarz K., Jungehulsing M. Retro-stemal lymph node metastases in breast cancer: lym-phoscintigraphy and magnetic resonance tomography. J. Clin. Oncol. 2001. №8. P. 3516-3523.
34. Manohar K., Mittal B. R., Senthil R., Kashyap R., Bhattacharya A., Singh G. Clinical utility of F-18 FDG PET/CT in recurrent breast carcinoma. Nucl. Med. Commun. 2012. Vol. 33, №6. P .591–596.
35. Mathieu I., Mazy S., Willemart B. et al. Inconclusive triple diagnosis in breast cancer imaging: is there a place for scintimammography? J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging. 2005. Vol. 46. P.1574 -1581.
36. Moon D. H., Maddahi J., Silverman D. H., Glaspy J. A., Phelps M. E., Hoh C. K. Accuracy of whole-body fluorine-18-FDG PET for the detection of recurrent or metastatic breast carcinoma’s. J. Nucl. Med. 1998. Vol. 39, №3. P. 431-435.
37. Moon D. H., Phelps M. E., Hoh C. K. Viability assessment with MRI is superior to FDG-PET for viability. J. Nucl. Car. 2010. Vol.17. №2. P. 292.
38. Silverman D. H., Glaspy J. A., Phelps M. E., Hoh C. K. Accuracy of whole-body fluorine-18-FDG PET for the detection of recurrent or metastatic breast carcinoma. J. Nucl. Med. 1998. Vol. 39, №3.P. 431–435.
39. Nieweg O. E., Rijk M. C., Olmos R. A. V., Hoefnagel C. A. Sentinel node biopsy and selective lymph node clearance – impact on regional control and survival in breast cancer and melanoma. J. Nucl. Med. 2005. Vol.32. P. 631-634.
40. Nomori H., Watanabe K., Ohtsuka T. et al. Visual and semiquantitative analyses for F-18 fluorodcoxyglucose PET scanning in pulmonary nodules 1 cm to 3 cm in size. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 2005. Vol. 79. P. 984-988.
41. Paik S. H., Chung M. J., Park J. S. High-resolution sonography of the rib: can fracture and metastasis be differentiated? Am. J. Roentgenol. 2005. Vol. 184, №3. P.969-974.
42. Sadako Akashi-Tanaka, Takashi Fukutomi, Natsuko Sato, Kunihisa Miyakawa. The role of computed tomography in the selection of breast cancer treatment. Breast Cancer. 2003. Vol. 10, №3. P. 198-203.
43. Schmidt G. P., Baur-Melnyk A., Tiling R., Hahn K et al. Comparison of high resolution whole-body MRI using parallel imaging and PET-CT. First experiences with a 32-channel MRI system. Radiologe. 2004. Vol. 44, № 9. P. 889-898.
44. Schmidt G. P., Baur-Melnyk A., Haug A et al. Comprehensive imaging of tumor recurrence in breast cancer patients using whole-body MRI at 1.5 and 3 T compared to FDG-PET-CT. Eur. J. Radiol. 2008. Vol. 65, №1. P. 47-58.
45. Tran A., Pio B. S., Khatibi B., Czernin J., Phelps M. E., Silverman D. H. 18F-FDG PET for staging breast cancer in patients with inner-quadrant versus outer-quadrant tumors: comparison with long-term clinical outcome. J. Nucl. Med. 2005. Vol. 46, №9. P. 1455-1459.
46. Vranjesevic D., Filmont J. E., Meta J., et al. Whole-body (18)F-FDG PET and conventional imaging for predicting outcome in previously treated breast cancer patients. J. Nucl. Med. 2002. Vol. 43, №3. P. 325–329.
47. Wirth A., Seymour J. F., Hicks R. J et al. Fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucosc positron emission tomography, gallium-67 scintigraphy, and conventional staging for Hodgkin's disease and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. Am. J. Med. 2002. Vol. 112. P. 262-268.

Number of Views: 1833


Bibliography link

Adylhanov T.A., Abiltaeva A.A., Baysalbaeva A.S. Possibilities of modern nuclear and radiation diagnosis in metastatic breast cancer: literature review. Nauka i Zdravoohranenie [Science & Healthcare]. 2015, 3, pp. 37-46.


Авторизируйтесь для отправки комментариев