COMPARATIVE FREQUENCY AND STRUCTURE OF COMPLICATIONS REFRACTION DISORDERS LASER CORRECTION OF WITH Femto LASIK and ReLEx SMILE TECHNOLOGIES

Laser correction of refractive disorders is one of the most effective directions in the treatment of myopia and astigmatism. At present, modern technologies of Femto LASIK and ReLEx SMILE are actively used. Comparison of their safety is relevant for choosing a method of treatment in clinical practice.

Zeynet U. Ahmedyanova 1,

Aida Sh. Smagulova 1,2

 

1 Department of Eye Diseases,

Astana Medical University,

Astana, Republic of Kazakhstan;

2 Department of inpatient care and outpatient surgery,

Republican Diagnostic Center,

Corporate Foundation "University Medical Center",

Astana, Republic of Kazakhstan

Литература:

1. Cai W.T., Liu Q.Y., Ren C.D. et al. Dry eye and corneal sensitivity after small incision lenticule extraction and femtosecond laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis: a Meta-analysis // Int J Ophthalmol. 2017. Vol.10(4). P.632-638.

2. Ehlke G.L., Krueger R.R. Laser Vision Correction in Treating Myopia // Asia Pac J Ophthalmol (Phila). 2016. Vol.5(6). P.434-437.

3. Galvis V., Tello A., Guerra A.R. et al. Risk factors and visual results in cases of LASIK flap repositioning due to folds or dislocation: case series and literature review. Int Ophthalmol. 2014. Vol.34(1). P.19-26.

4. Glantz S.A. Primer of Biostatistics. McGRAW-HILL. Health Professions Division. 1999.

5. Kobashi H., Kamiya K., Shimizu K. Dry Eye After Small Incision Lenticule Extraction and Femtosecond Laser-Assisted LASIK: Meta-Analysis // Cornea. 2017. Vol.36(1). P.85-91.

6. Lavinsky D., Sramek C., Wang J. et al. Subvisible retinal laser therapy: titration algorithm and tissue response // Retina. 2014. Vol.34(1). P.87-97.

7. Lee J.K., Chuck R.S., Park C.Y. Femtosecond laser refractive surgery: small-incision lenticule extraction vs. femtosecond laser-assisted LASIK // Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2015. Vol.26(4). P.260-264.

8. Piñero D.P., Teus M.A. Clinical outcomes of small-incision lenticule extraction and femtosecond laser-assisted wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis // J Cataract Refract Surg. 2016. Vol.42(7). P.1078-1093.

9. Qin B., Li M., Chen X. et al. Early visual outcomes and optical quality after femtosecond laser small-incision lenticule extraction for myopia and myopic astigmatism correction of over -10 dioptres // Acta Ophthalmol. 2017. Vol.56. P.321-330.

10. Reynolds A., Moore J.E., Naroo S.A. et al. Excimer laser surface ablation - a review // Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2010. Vol.38(2). P.168-182.

11. dos Santos A.M., Torricelli A.A., Marino G.K. et al. Femtosecond Laser-Assisted LASIK Flap Complications // J Refract Surg. 2016. Vol.32(1). P.52-59.

12. Seiler T., Koller T., Wittwer VV. Limitations of SMILE (Small Incision Lenticule Extraction) // Klin Monbl Augenheilkd. 2017. Vol.234(1). P.125-129.

13. Shen Z., Zhu Y., Song X. et al. Dry Eye after Small Incision Lenticule Extraction (SMILE) versus Femtosecond Laser-Assisted in Situ Keratomileusis (FS-LASIK) for Myopia: A Meta-Analysis // PLoS One. 2016 Vol.11(12): e0168081.

14. Shortt A.J., Allan B.D., Evans J.R. Laser-assisted in-situ keratomileusis (LASIK) versus photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) for myopia // Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013. (1): CD005135.

15. Sugar A., Hood C.T., Mian S.I. Patient-Reported Outcomes Following LASIK: Quality of Life in the PROWL Studies // JAMA. 2017. Vol.317(2). P.204-205.

16. Utsunomiya T., Kawahara A., Hanada K., Yoshida A. Effects of Diquafosol Ophthalmic Solution on Quality of Life in Dry Eye Assessed Using the Dry Eye-Related Quality-of-Life Score Questionnaire: Effectiveness in Patients While Reading and Using Visual Display Terminals // Cornea. 2017. Vol.36(8). P.908-914.

17. Vastardis I., Gatzioufas Z., Pajic B.E. et al. Multifocal Corneal Excimer Femtosecond Laser in situ Keratomileusis following Radial Keratotomy: A Case Report with Six Months of Follow-Up // Case Rep Ophthalmol. 2014. Vol.5(3). P.423-428.

18. Vickers L.A., Gupta P.K. Femtosecond laser-assisted keratotomy. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2016. Vol.27(4). P.277-284.

19. Wen D., McAlinden C., Flitcroft I. et al. Postoperative Efficacy, Predictability, Safety, and Visual Quality of Laser Corneal Refractive Surgery: A Network Meta-analysis // Am J Ophthalmol. 2017. Vol.178. P.65-78.

20. Yang J.H., Yu S.Y., Kim T.G. et al. Morphologic changes in the retina after selective retina therapy // Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2016. Vol.254(6). P.1099-1109.



Number of Views: 505


Bibliography link

Ахмедьянова З.У., Смагулова А.Ш. Сравнительная частота и структура осложнений лазерной коррекции нарушений рефракции с использованием технологий Femto LASIK и ReLEx SMILE / / Наука и Здравоохранение. 2018. №1. С. 49-58.

Ahmedyanova Z.U., Smagulova A.Sh. Comparative frequency and structure of complications refraction disorders laser correction of WITH Femto LASIK and ReLEx SMILE technologies. Nauka i Zdravookhranenie [Science & Healthcare]. 2018, 1, pp. 49-58.

Ахмедьянова З.У., Смагулова А.Ш. Femto LASIK и ReLEx SMILE технологияларын қолданумен рефракцияның бұзылыстарын лазерлік түзетудің асқынуларыны салыстырмалы жиілігі мен құрылымы / / Ғылым және Денсаулық сақтау. 2018. №1. Б. 49-58.


Авторизируйтесь для отправки комментариев