ANALYSIS OF THE RESULTS OF SURGICAL TREATMENT OF HYPOSРADIA IN CHILDREN FOR 2010 – 2015
Introduction. In the last decades, various methods of surgical correction have been widely used for the treatment of hypospadias. Despite this, there are different types of complications occurred in both the early postoperative and late periods.
Aim. The purpose of our research is to analyze the results of surgical treatment of hypospadias by instantaneous and step – by – step methods of urethroplasty.
Materials and methods. A simultaneous cross – sectional study of the results of surgical treatment of hypospadias was carried out in boys aged from three months to 17 years, who were hospitalized in the “National research Center for Maternal and Child health” and “Children's hospital №2 in Astana” from January 2010 to December 2015. "The medical documentation form 003 / y" – a medical card of a hospital patient – was taken the material of the study. Held the copy of the data: age, local status data, methods of surgical interventions, the data of laboratory and instrumental investigations, the types of postoperative complications from 304 stationary cards of the patients, who underwent preoperative testing and treatment in these hospitals. The average age of patients was 66,9 months, minimum 3 months, maximum 204 months. One – and two – stage types of urethroplasty were made on 179 patients with primary hypospadias from all patients were given using grafts of the mucous membrane of the cheek, tongue and skin of the foreskin, to 113 patients, who were sent from different regions of the country, was held urethra reconstruction, 13 patients did not undergo surgery because of catarrhal phenomena from the upper respiratory tract.
Results. The average age of patients was 66,9 months, minimum 3 months, maximum 204 months. Primary hypospadias was 175 (57,6%) of them: distal form – 68 (22,3%), medium – 59 (19.3%), proximal – 40 (13,1%), hypospadias without hypospadias – 8 (2,6%). Hospitalized patients with a history of various types of hypospadias correction were – 115 (37,8%).
The number of postoperative complications was: urethral and skin fistula in 56 (18.4%), dystopia of the neomeatus was observed in 35 (11.5%) patients, penile deformity of the “plus tissue” type was – 23 (7.6%), neo-urethra stenosis occurred in 7 (2.3%) patients.
Conclusion Thus, the occurrence of postoperative complications involves conducting research to develop standardized approaches to the assessment of hypospadias and choice of surgical treatment in order to improve the results of urethroplasty.
Almira D. Zharkimbaeva 1, https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3487-0170
Azat A. Dyusembayev 1, https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3398-7329
Maratbek T. Aubakirov 1, https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8650-2225
1 Department of Pediatric Surgery and Orthopedics, Semey Medical University,
Semey, Republic of Kazakhstan.
1. Abdelhameed H. et al. The long-term results of lingual mucosal grafts for repairing long anterior urethral strictures // Arab J. Urol. 2015. Т. 13. № 2. С. 128–133.
2. Acimi S. Comparative study of two techniques used in distal hypospadias repair: Tubularized incised plate (Snodgrass) and tubularized urethral plate (Duplay) // Scand. J. Urol. Nephrol. 2011. Т. 45. № 1. С. 68–71.
3. Ahmed M., Alsaid A. Is combined inner preputial inlay graft with tubularized incised plate in hypospadias repair worth doing? // J. Pediatr. Urol. 2015. Т. 11. № 4. С. 229.e1-229.e4.
4. Aisuodionoe-Shadrach O.I. et al. Hypospadias repair and outcome in Abuja, Nigeria: A 5-year single-centre experience. // Afr. J. Paediatr. Surg. 2015. Т. 12. № 1. С. 41–4.
5. Alsharbaini R., Almaramhy H. Snodgrass urethroplasty for hypospadias repair: A retrospective comparison of two variations of the technique // J. Taibah Univ. Med. Sci. 2014. Т. 9. № 1. С. 69–73.
6. Altarac S., Papeš D., Bracka A. Surgery Illustrated Surgical atlas: Two-stage hypospadias repair with inner preputial layer Wolfe graft (Aivar Bracka repair) // BJU Int. 2012. Т. 110. № 3. С. 460–473.
7. Alyami F. et al. Keloid formation after pediatric male genital surgeries: an uncommon and difficult problem to manage // J. Pediatr. Urol. 2018.
8. Amukele S.A. et al. Management and outcome of complex hypospadias repairs // J. Urol. 2005. Т. 174. № 4 II. С. 1540–1543.
9. Andersson M. et al. Hypospadias repair with tubularized incised plate: does the obstructive flow pattern resolve spontaneously? // J Pediatr Urol. 2011. Т. 7. С. 441.
10. Arshad A.R. Hypospadias repair: Byar’s two stage operation revisited // Br. J. Plast. Surg. 2005. Т. 58. № 4. С. 481–486.
11. Bush N.C. et al. Age does not impact risk for urethroplasty complications after tubularized incised plate repair of hypospadias in prepubertal boys // J. Pediatr. Urol. 2013. Т. 9. № 3. С. 252–256.
12. Gingu C. et al. Managing a complex case of hypospadias cripple and chordee // J. Clin. Investig. Surg. 2017. Т. 2. № 2. С. 99–104.
13. Hennekam R.C.M. et al. Elements of morphology: Standard terminology for the external genitalia // Am. J. Med. Genet. Part A. 2013. Т. 161. № 6. С. 1238–1263.
14. Hongyong J. et al. Comparison of lingual mucosa and buccal mucosa grafts used in inlay urethroplasty in failed hypospadias of pre-pubertal boys in a Chinese group // PLoS One. 2017. Т. 12. № 8. С. e0182803.
15. Horst H.J.R. van der, Wall L.L. de. Hypospadias, all there is to know. // Eur. J. Pediatr. 2017. Т. 176. № 4. С. 435–441.
16. Huang L.-Q. et al. Retrospective analysis of individual risk factors for urethrocutaneous fistula after onlay hypospadias repair in pediatric patients // 2015.
17. Johnson E.K. et al. Use of buccal mucosa grafts for urethral reconstruction in children: A retrospective cohort study // BMC Urol. 2014. Т. 14. № 1. С. 1–6.
18. Kadian Y. et al. Tunica vaginalis: An aid in hypospadias fistula repair: Our experience of 14 cases // African J. Paediatr. Surg. 2011.
19. Kadian Y.S., Singh M., Rattan K.N. The role of tunica vaginalis flap in staged repair of hypospadias // Asian J. Urol. 2017. Т. 4. № 2. С. 107–110.
20. Kumar A., Narayan C., Faiz N. Case series : long term experience with different types of hypospadias and its correction by single stage procedure // 2018. Т. 5. № 4. С. 1428–1431.
21. Mangera A., Patterson J.M., Chapple C.R. A systematic review of graft augmentation urethroplasty techniques for the treatment of anterior urethral strictures // Eur. Urol. 2011.
22. Medscience B. Организация и управление здравоохранением Научные организации // http://medscience.kz/2015/10/24/2011-2013_ncu_mochepol/. 2019. № January.
23. Mieusset R., Soulié M. Hypospadias: Psychosocial, sexual, and reproductive consequences in adult life // J. Androl. 2005. Т. 26. № 2. С. 163–168.
24. Nuhoǧlu B. et al. Surgical treatment options in proximal hypospadias: Retrospective analysis of 171 cases at a single institution // Int. Urol. Nephrol. 2006. Т. 38. № 3–4. С. 593–598.
25. Qin C. и др. A modified method for the treatment of urethral fistula after hypospadias repair // Asian J. Androl. 2012. Т. 14. С. 900–902.
26. Snodgrass W. et al. Hypospadias dilemmas: a round table // J Pediatr Urol. 2011. Т. 7. С. 145.
27. Spinoit A.-F. et al. Hypospadias Repair at a Tertiary Care Center: Long-Term Followup is Mandatory to Determine the Real Complication Rate // J. Urol. 2013. Т. 189. № 6. С. 2276–2281.
28. Springer A., Heijkant M. van den, Baumann S. Worldwide prevalence of hypospadias // J. Pediatr. Urol. 2016. Т. 12. № 3. С. 152.e1-152.e7.
29. Usupbaev A.C. et al. Comparative assessment of surgical treatment for hypospadias // Andrologiya i genitalnaya Hirurgiya. 2016. T.17 №2. С. 45–49.
30. Zheng D.-C. et al. Two-stage urethroplasty is a better choice for proximal hypospadias with severe chordee after urethral plate transection: a single-center experience. // Asian J. Androl. 2015. Т. 17. № 1. С. 94–7.
31. Vybor metoda korrekcii proksimal’noj gipospadii v detskom vozraste| Experimental and clinical urology [Электронный ресурс]. URL: http://ecuro.ru/article/vybor-metoda-korrektsii-proksimalnoi-gipospadii-v-detskom-vozraste (accessed: 30.03.2017).
Number of Views: 330
Category of articles:
Original articles
Bibliography link
Жаркимбаева А.Д., Дюсембаев А.А. Аубакиров М.Т. Анализ результатов хирургического лечения гипоспадии у детей за 2010 – 2015 годы // Наука и Здравоохранение. 2019. 1 (Т.21).С. 91-98. Zharkimbaeva A.D., Dyusembayev A.A., Aubakirov M.T. Analysis of the results of surgical treatment of hyposрadia in children for 2010 – 2015 // Nauka i Zdravookhranenie [Science & Healthcare]. 2019, (Vol.21) 1, pp. 91-98. Жаркимбаева А.Д., Дюсембаев А.А. Аубакиров М.Т. 2010 – 2015 жылдар аралығындағы балалар гипоспадиясының хирургиялық еміне талдау // Ғылым және Денсаулық сақтау. 2019. 1 (Т.21). Б. 91-98.Related publications:
ANALYSIS OF CLINICAL AND DEMOGRAPHIC INDICATORS OF PATIENTS WITH PARKINSON'S DISEASE IN THE SOUTHERN REGION OF KAZAKHSTAN
A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF DRUG POLICY REGARDING ORPHAN DISEASES IN THE USA, THE EUROPEAN UNION, AND THE REPUBLIC OF KAZAKHSTAN
MUTATIONS IN CARDIAC ION CHANNEL GENES IN KAZAKHSTANI PATIENTS WITH LONG QT SYNDROME
GENETIC FEATURES OF CONGENITAL DYSFUNCTION OF THE ADRENAL CORTEX CAUSED BY 21-HYDROXYLASE DEFICIENCY IN PERSONS OF KAZAKH NATIONALITY
NON-MOTOR SYMPTOMS IN PARKINSON'S DISEASE USING THE EXAMPLE OF AKTOBE PATIENTS