EXTERNAL FIXATION OF PELVIC RING INJURIES AT EMERGENCY MEDICAL CARE STAGE
Introduction. According to the data of biomechanical and retrospective clinical studies, it is clear that the degree of evidence of available publications does not allow us to fully judge the clinical effectiveness of pelvic immobilization. In addition, we found no data on changes in the level of pain during pelvic immobilization.
Purpose. Creation of an original device and its clinical justification in a comparative aspect.
Materials and methods. This work was carried out within the framework of grant funding of the Ministry of education and science of the Republic of Kazakhstan. The theme of the project: "Development of a system for orthosurgical rehabilitation of pelvic bone injuries in road accidents in the Republic of Kazakhstan". The study included 44 patients admitted to three level 1 trauma centers of the Republic of Kazakhstan who met the criteria for inclusion and exclusion. Design: a pilot randomized clinical trial. The main group consists of all patients with pelvic injuries using the proposed utility model. Control group - all patients with injury of the pelvis with the use of immobilization wıth sheets.
Results. 52.3 % of the victims (N=23) were immobilized by the utility model we developed, 47.7 % (N=21) were immobilized by a sheet. The duration of the immobilization method averaged 85.18 min ±37.77 min. In 77.3% of cases (N=34), pelvic bone fractures occurred as part of multiple trauma. The study did not identify any cases with complications related to immobilization. Patients in both study groups were comparable in age, gender, severity of injuries, and severity of condition.
Conclusions. According to the results of our study, we have seen a tendency to lengthen the length of hospitalization, especially in the intensive care unit in the group with sheet immobilization. In addition, the volume of infusion antishock therapy between groups had a certain tendency to lower volumes in the group using the utility model developed by us (p=0.393). The description of changes in the patient's pain severity 30 and 60 minutes after immobilization was "much smaller" mainly in the group using the proposed utility model.
Elnara I. Efendiyeva 1, https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4506-1619
Yersin T. Zhunussov 1, https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1182-5257
Assylzhan M. Messova 1, https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5373-0523
Ruslan S. Botayev 2, https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1556-4397
Aidos S. Tlemissov 1, https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4239-6627
Ayan O. Myssayev 3, https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7332-4856
1 NCJSC «Semey Medical University», Semey city, Republic of Kazakhstan;
2 State-owned enterprise with the right of economic management ‘Nur-Sultan city Hospital № 1,
Nur-Sultan city, Republic of Kazakhstan;
3 Department of science and human resources of the Ministry of health of the Republic of Kazakhstan, Nur-Sultan city, Republic of Kazakhstan.
1. Andrich S., Haastert B., Neuhaus E., Neidert K., Arend W., Ohmann C., Icks, A. (2015). Epidemiology of Pelvic Fractures in Germany: Considerably High Incidence Rates among Older People. PLOS ONE, 10(9), e0139078. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0139078
2. Bakhshayesh P., Boutefnouchet T., Tötterman A. Effectiveness of non invasive external pelvic compression: a systematic review of the literature. Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine, 2016a, 24(1), 73. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13049-016-0259-7
3. Bakhshayesh P., Boutefnouchet T., Tötterman A. Effectiveness of non invasive external pelvic compression: a systematic review of the literature. Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine, 2016 b 24(73), 2–9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13049-016-0259-7
4. Chueire A.G., Carvalho Filho G., Santos A.F., Pockel K.P. Fraturas do anel pélvico: estudo epidemiológico. Acta Ortopédica Brasileira, 2004. 12(1), 05–11. https://doi.org/10.1590/s1413-78522004000100001
5. Coccolini F., Stahel P. F., Montori G., Biffl W., Horer T.M., Catena F. Pelvic trauma: WSES classification and guidelines. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13017-017-0117-6
6. Damasceno E.R., Dinhane D.I., Bueno F.M., Bartelega J., Leite R., Ancheschi C. Epidemiology of pelvic ring fractures and injuries 2017. 2(3), 260–269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rboe.2017.05.012
7. Epidemiology of Osteoporotic Pelvic Fractures in Elderly People in Finland: Sharp Increase in 1970–1997 and Alarming Projections for the New Millennium | SpringerLink. (n.d.). Retrieved September 3, 2020, from https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs001980070112
8. Fu C.-Y., Wu Y.-T., Liao C.-H., Kang S.-C., Wang S.-Y., Hsu Y.-P., Ouyang C.-H. Pelvic circumferential compression devices benefit patients with pelvic fractures who need transfers. The American Journal of Emergency Medicine, 2013. 31(10), 1432–1436. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajem.2013.06.044
9. Govorova N.V., Govorov V.V., Govorov M.V., Murasov M.V. Temporary pelvic immobilization in providing assistance to victims with a high-energy combined trauma during transport. Novosti Khirurgii, 2016. 24(2), 151–156. https://doi.org/10.18484/2305-0047.2016.2.151
10. Hauschild O., Strohm P.C., Culemann U., Pohlemann T., Suedkamp N. P., Koestler W., Schmal H. Mortality in patients with pelvic fractures: results from the German pelvic Injury register. The Journal of Trauma: Injury, Infection, and Critical Care, 2008. 64(2), 449–455. https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0b013e31815982b1
11. Hermans E., Biert, J., Edwards M.J.R. Epidemiology of Pelvic Ring Fractures in a Level 1 Trauma Center in the Netherlands. Hip & Pelvis, 2017. 29(4), 253. https://doi.org/10.5371/hp.2017.29.4.253
12. Holstein J.H., Stuby F.M., Herath S.C., Culemann U., Aghayev E., Pohlemann T. Influence of the pelvic trauma registry of the DGU on treatment of pelvic ring fractures. Der Unfallchirurg, 2016. 119(6), 475–481. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00113-016-0168-2
13. Humphrey C.A., Liu Q., Templeman D.C., Ellis T.J. Locked Plates Reduce Displacement of Vertically Unstable Pelvic Fractures in a Mechanical Testing Model. The Journal of Trauma: Injury, Infection, and Critical Care, 2010. 69(5), 1230–1234. https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0b013e3181d3cc07
14. Marrinan S., Pearce M.S., Jiang X.Y., Waters S., Shanshal Y. Admission for osteoporotic pelvic fractures and predictors of length of hospital stay, mortality and loss of independence. Age and Ageing, 2015. 44(2), 258–261. https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afu123
15. Mitchell P.M., Corrigan C.M., Patel N.A., Silverberg, A.J., Greenberg S.E., Thakore R.V., Sethi M.K. 13-Year experience in external fixation of the pelvis: complications, reduction and removal. European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery, 2016, 42(1), 91–96. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-015-0499-7
16. Palmcrantz J., Hardcastle T.C., Naidoo S.R., Muckart D.J.J., Ahlm K., Eriksson A. Pelvic fractures at a new level 1 trauma centre: who dies from pelvic trauma? The Inkosi Albert Luthuli Central Hospital experience. Orthopaedic Surgery, 2012. 4(4), 216–221. https://doi.org/10.1111/os.12002
17. Pereira G.J.C., Damasceno E.R., Dinhane D.I., Bueno F.M., Leite J.B. Epidemiology of pelvic ring fractures and injuries. Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia, 2017a. 52(3), 260–269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rboe.2017.05.012
18. Pereira G.J.C., Damasceno E.R., Dinhane D.I., Bueno F.M., Leite J.B.R., Ancheschi B.C. Epidemiology of pelvic ring fractures and injuries. Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia (English Edition), 2017b. 52(3), 260–269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rboe.2017.05.012
19. Pereira S.J., O’Brien D.P., Luchette F.A., Choe K.A., Lim E., Davis K., Frame S.B. Dynamic helical computed tomography scan accurately detects hemorrhage in patients with pelvic fracture. Surgery, 2000. 128(4), 678–685. https://doi.org/10.1067/msy.2000.108219
20. Pizanis A., Pohlemann T., Burkhardt M., Aghayev E., Holstein J.H. Emergency stabilization of the pelvic ring: Clinical comparison between three different techniques. Injury, 2013. 44(12), 1760–1764. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2013.07.009
21. Prasarn M.L., Horodyski M., Schneider P.S., Pernik M.N., Gary J.L., Rechtine G.R. Comparison of skin pressure measurements with the use of pelvic circumferential compression devices on pelvic ring injuries. Injury, 2016. 47(3), 717–720. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2015.11.039
22. Prevalence of Pelvic Fractures, Associated Injuries, and Mortality: The United Kingdom Perspective - PubMed. (n.d.). Retrieved May 27, 2020, from https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18090020/?from_term=pelvic+ring+injury+epidemiology&from_page=9&from_pos=4
23. Prieto-Alhambra D., Avilеs F.F., Judge A., Van Staa T., Noguеs X., Arden N.K., Javaid M.K. Burden of pelvis fracture: A population-based study of incidence, hospitalisation and mortality. Osteoporosis International, 2012. 23(12), 2797–2803. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-012-1907-z
24. Routt M.L., Falicov A., Woodhouse E., Schildhauer T.A. Circumferential pelvic antishock sheeting: a temporary resuscitation aid. Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma, 2006. 20(1 Suppl), S3-6. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16385204
25. Ruatti S., Guillot S., Brun J., Thony F., Bouzat P., Payen J. F., Tonetti J. Which pelvic ring fractures are potentially lethal? Injury, 2015. 46(6), 1059–1063. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2015.01.041
26. Spanjersberg W.R., Knops S.P., Schep N.W.L., van Lieshout E.M.., Patka P., Schipper I.B. Effectiveness and complications of pelvic circumferential compression devices in patients with unstable pelvic fractures: A systematic review of literature. Injury, 2009. 40(10), 1031–1035. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2009.06.164
27. Starr A.J., Griffin D.R., Reinert C.M., Frawley W.H., Walker J., Whitlock S.N., Jones A.L. Pelvic ring disruptions: prediction of associated injuries, transfusion requirement, pelvic arteriography, complications, and mortality. Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma 2002., 16(8), 553–561. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12352563
28. Topics D. Educational material. Pelvic immobilization device. https://www.mlrems.org/GetFile.aspx?fileID=9680
29. Yang N.-P., Chan C.-L., Chu D., Lin Y.-Z., Lin K.-B., Yu, Lee Y.-H. Epidemiology of hospitalized traumatic pelvic fractures and their combined injuries in Taiwan: 2000–2011 National Health Insurance data surveillance. 2014. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/878601
Number of Views: 214
Bibliography link
Efendiyeva E.I., Zhunussov Ye.T., Messova A.M., Botayev R.S., Tlemissov A.S, Myssayev A.O. External fixation of pelvic ring injuries at emergency medical care stage // Nauka i Zdravookhranenie [Science & Healthcare]. 2020, (Vol.22) 5, pp. 84-91. doi 10.34689/SH.2020.22.5.008Related publications:
ANALYSIS OF THE CURRENT SITUATION ON THE AVAILABILITY OF INFORMATION ON ONGOING CLINICAL TRIALS IN THE REPUBLIC OF KAZAKHSTAN
PROBLEMATIC SOCIAL MEDIA USE AND MENTAL BEING OF URBAN AND RURAL ADOLESCENTS IN KAZAKHSTAN
INFLUENCE OF THE COMPOSITION OF “VOLCANO MINERAL” PLANT AND ANIMAL RAW MATERIALS ON HUMORAL AND CELLULAR STRUCTURE OF THE IMMUNE SYSTEM
ESTABLISHING A FAMILIAL HYPERCHOLESTEROLAEMIA REGISTER IN THE REPUBLIC KAZAKHSTAN
EVALUATION OF ROOT CANAL CONFIGURATION OF MANDIBULAR FIRST MOLARS IN A KAZAKHSTAN POPULATION BY USING CONE-BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY