SCIENTIFIC ASPECTS OF PATIENT REHABILITATION AFTER STROKE. REVIEW LITERATURE.
Introduction. Cardiovascular diseases (CVD) occupy a stable leading position among the causes of mortality in most countries of the world, including Kazakhstan. According to the information from the state collection "Natural movement of the Population of the Republic of Kazakhstan" for January-December 2020, the Bureau of National Statistics of the Agency for Strategic Planning and Reforms of the Republic of Kazakhstan, among the causes of mortality in the first place is mortality due to diseases of the circulatory system (36.6 thousand people). It accounts for 22% of the total mortality. In comparison with 2019, the number of deaths from heart attacks, strokes, coronary heart disease, angina increased by 6.3 thousand (+ 20.6%). Rehabilitation of patients at the stage of residual stroke phenomena is not given much importance, since it is believed that the recovery processes have already been completed by this period. However, there are scientific data indicating that rehabilitation measures are sufficiently effective in patients who had a stroke 2 years ago or more, provided that rehabilitation measures are used as actively as in the acute and early recovery periods of stroke [43]. The purpose of the study: To analyze the literature data on the rehabilitation of patients of working age after a stroke. Search strategy: The study examined full-text publications in English and Russian, which are devoted to the rehabilitation of patients of working age after a stroke. In the process of literature search, the following search engines were used: Pubmed, Web of science, Cyberleninka, Google Scholar by keywords cardiovascular disease, stroke, mortality, disability, rehabilitation, rehabilitation organization. The time period was designated 2011-2021. 956 publications have been identified on this topic. Of these, 43 publications corresponded to the purpose of our study. Results and conclusions. Numerous publications show that, unfortunately, at the present stage there are not enough organizational measures that would improve the health indicators of stroke patients, improve the quality of life, and reduce disability.
Gulnaz K.Kairatova¹, https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8879-564X Zaituna A. Khismetov¹, https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5937-3045 Zhanar M. Zhumanbayeva1, http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8941-862X Aizhan S. Zholdasbekova², https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6954-3351 Marzhan D. Brimzhanova ², https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3517-4687 Dariga S. Smailova², https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7152-7104 1 NCJSC «Semey Medical University», Semey c., Republic of Kazakhstan; 2 Kazakhstan Medical University "Higher School of Public Health", Almaty, Republic of Kazakhstan.
1. Alexander D., Michael R., Background. Medical and neurological complications during inpatient stroke rehabilitation // Stroke. 2014. № 2 (25). C. 358–361. 2. Asakawa T. [et al.]. Unmet challenges for rehabilitation after stroke in China // The Lancet. 2017. № 10090 (390). C. 121–122. 3. Bennett D.A. [et al.]. The global burden of ischemic stroke: findings of the GBD 2010 study // Global heart. 2014. № 1 (9). C. 107–112. 4. Bindawas S. M., Vennu V.S. Stroke rehabilitation: A call to action in Saudi Arabia // Neurosciences. 2016. № 4 (21). C. 297–305. 5. Carvalho J.J. Freitas A., Monique B.V. Stroke epidemiology, patterns of management, and outcomes in Fortaleza, Brazil: A hospital-based multicenter prospective study // Stroke. 2011. № 12 (42). C. 3341–3346. 6. Doshi V.S., Say J.H. Complications in Stroke Patients: A Study Carried out at The Rehabilitation Medicine Service, Changi General Hospital // Singapore Med J. 2015. № 12 (44). C. 643–652. 7. English C., Healy G.N. Research Report 2016. № 2 (96). C. 193–201. 8. Feigin V.L. Global and regional burden of stroke during 1990-2010: findings from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010 // Lancet (London, England). 2014. № 9913 (383). C. 245–255. 9. Feigin V.L. Update on the Global Burden of Ischemic and Hemorrhagic Stroke in 1990-2013: The GBD 2013 Study // Neuroepidemiology. 2015. № 3 (45). C. 161–176. 10. Fróes K.S. Factors associated with health-related quality of life for adults with stroke sequelae // Arquivos de Neuro-Psiquiatria. 2011. № 2 B (69). C. 371–376. 11. Gunaydin R., Determinants of quality of life (QoL) in elderly stroke patients: a short-term follow-up study // Archives of gerontology and geriatrics. 2011. № 1 (53). C. 19–23. 12. Hung J.W. Incidence and risk factors of medical complications during inpatient stroke rehabilitation // Chang Gung Medical Journal. 2005. № 1 (28). C. 31–38. 13. Kim A.S., Johnston S.C. Global variation in the relative burden of stroke and ischemic heart disease // Circulation. 2011. № 3 (124). C. 314–323. 14. Kim G. Impact of co-occurring dysarthria and aphasia on functional recovery in post-stroke patients // Annals of Rehabilitation Medicine. 2016. № 6 (40). C. 1010–1017. 15. Kim J.S. Stroke in Asia: a global disaster // International journal of stroke : official journal of the International Stroke Society. 2014. № 7 (9). C. 856–857. 16. Konermann S. HHS Public Access // Physiology & behavior. 2019. № 1 (173(3)). C. 665–676. 17. Kovalchuk V.V. Patients After Stroke: Peculiarities of Care and Rehabilitation // Siberian Medical Review. 2017. № 1. C. 99–106. 18. Kovalchuk V.V. Therapeutic possibilities of improvement of cognitive functions, psychoemotional condition and a quality of life in post-stroke patients // Zhurnal Nevrologii i Psihiatrii imeni S.S. Korsakova. 2015. № 12 (2015). C. 92–97. 19. Kovalchuk V.V., Khaibullin T.N., Zuyeva I.B., Nesterin K.V., Uap Zh.T. Theoretical and practical principles of neurorehabilitation in post-stroke patients // Zh. Neurol Psychiatrist Named After S.S. Korsakov. 2018. №.118. С.55-62. 20. Kovalchuk V.V. Correction of cognitive and psychoemotional disorders in post-stroke patients // Zhurnal Nevrologii i Psikhiatrii im. S.S. Korsakova. 2015. №115(12), С.92-97. 21. Krishnamurthi R.V. [et al.]. The global burden of hemorrhagic stroke: a summary of findings from the GBD 2010 study // Global heart. 2014. №1 (9). C. 101–106. 22. Kubo M. Trends in the incidence, mortality, and survival rate of cardiovascular disease in a Japanese community: the Hisayama study // Stroke. 2003. № 10 (34). C. 2349–2354. 23. Maria Jose Melo R-L., Ismeˆnia de Carvalho B., Quality of life after stroke: impact of clinical and sociodemographic factors // Clinics (Sao Paulo, Brazil). 2018. 73. 24. Maurício I. P., Lucas M. The influence of patient’s knowledge about stroke in Brazil: a cross sectional study // Arquivos de neuro-psiquiatria. 2014. № 12 (72). C. 938–941. 25. Mukherjee D., Patil C.G. Epidemiology and the global burden of stroke // World neurosurgery. 2011. № 6 Suppl (76). 26. O'Connor J. Orthotic management of instability of the knee related to neuromuscular and central nervous system disorders: systematic review, qualitative study, survey and costing analysis // Health technology assessment (Winchester, England). 2016. № 55 (20). C.1–296. 27. Ojo Owolabi M. Psychometric properties of the HRQOLISP-40: A novel, shortened multiculturally valid holistic stroke measure // Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair. 2010. № 9 (24). C. 814–825. 28. Panício M.I. The influence of patient’s knowledge about stroke in Brazil: A cross sectional study // Arquivos de Neuro-Psiquiatria. 2014. № 12 (72). C. 938–941. 29. Pollak J. Stratification substantially reduces behavioral variability in the hypoxic–ischemic stroke model // Brain and Behavior. 2012. № 5 (2). C. 698. 30. Pontes-Neto O.M. Stroke awareness in Brazil: Alarming results in a community-based study // Stroke. 2008. № 2 (39). C. 292–296. 31. Rangel E.S., Belasco A.G., Diccini S. Qualidade de vida de pacientes com acidente vascular cerebral em reabilitação // Acta Paulista de Enfermagem. 2013. № 2 (26). C. 205–212. 32. Roth E.J. During Stroke Rehabilitation // Stroke. 2013 (32). C. 523–529. 33. Sackett D.L., Rosenberg W.M. Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn’t // BMJ (Clinical research ed.). 1996. № 7023 (312). C. 3–5. 34. Stevens E.G. The Burden of Stroke in Europe: Overview of stroke burden and care in each EU and SAFE member country / Stroke Alliance for Europe, 2017. № 1 (29). C. 12. 35. Tomioka K. Short-term effects of physiotherapy combining repetitive acilitationexercises and orthotic treatment in chronic post-stroke patients // Journal of Physical Therapy Science. 2017. № 2 (29). C. 212. 36. Toyoda K. Guidelines for Intravenous Thrombolysis (Recombinant Tissue-type Plasminogen Activator), the Third Edition, March 2019: A Guideline from the Japan Stroke Society // Neurologia medico-chirurgica. 2019. № 12 (59). C. st.2019-0177. 37. Truelsen T. Stroke incidence and prevalence in Europe: a review of available data // European journal of neurology. 2016. № 6 (13). C. 581–598. 38. Venketasubramanian N. Stroke Epidemiology in South, East, and South-East Asia: A Review // Journal of Stroke. 2017. № 3 (19). C. 286–294. 39. Wafa H.A. Burden of Stroke in Europe: Thirty-Year Projections of Incidence, Prevalence, Deaths, and Disability-Adjusted Life Years // Stroke. 2020. № 8 (51). C. 2418. 40. Wilkins E. European Cardiovascular Disease Statistics 2017 // Clinical Epigenetics. 2017. 41. William E.H., David L.R. Quality of life after stroke: a prospective longitudinal study // Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation. 2011. № 6 (20). C. 799–806. 42. Williams L. Measuring quality of life in a way that is meaningful to stroke patients // Neurology. 2019. № 8 (53). C. 1839–1843. 43. Won Hyuk C., Min Kyun S. Return to work after stroke: The KOSCO Study // Journal of rehabilitation medicine. 2016. № 3 (48). C. 273–279. 44. Zaremba L.S., Smoleński W.H. Optimal portfolio choice under a liability constraint // Annals of Operations Research. 2018. № 1–4 (97). C. 131–141. 45. Zorowitz R., Brainin M. Advances in brain recovery and rehabilitation 2010 // Stroke. 2011. № 2 (42). C. 294–297.
Number of Views: 133

Key words:

Bibliography link

Kairatova G.K., Zhumanbayeva Zh.M., Khismetova Z.A., Zholdasbekova A.S., Brimzhanova M.D., Smailova D.S. Scientific aspects of patient rehabilitation after stroke. Literature review // Nauka i Zdravookhranenie [Science & Healthcare]. 2022, (Vol.24) 2, pp. 103-111. doi 10.34689/SH.2022.24.2.013

Авторизируйтесь для отправки комментариев