THE ASSESSMENT OF CLINICAL AND ECONOMIC EFFECTIVENESS OF RADIOFREQUENCY ABLATION WITH IMPLANTED CARDIAC DEVICES IN PATIENTS WITH ATRIAL FIBRILLATION. LITERATURE REVIEW
Introduction. Atrial fibrillation (AFib) is a health condition in which irregular heartbeats are registered in the chambers of the heart. The condition is characterized by the risk of developing blood clots which may lead to stroke. Objective. To evaluate the clinical and cost-effectiveness and safety of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) with implanted cardiac devices versus the Cox-Maze procedure (CM) in drug-resistant patients with AFib. Search strategy. PubMed, the Cochrane Library, NICE, and CADTH Evidence Driven have been used for the literature search. Search filters: systematic reviews, meta - analyzes, randomized controlled trials (RCTs); population: humans; date of publication: 5 -20 years. To assess the quality of systematic reviews and meta-analyses, we used the AMSTAR checklist. The ELSI checklist has been applied in order to check RFA for potential ethical, social and legal aspects. The article was peer-reviewed by two independent public health professionals. Results. The success rates of RFA varied and might be explained by AFib types and an electrophysiologist’s clinical experience. From the safety standpoint, the technology may cause rare complications (3-5%) as bleeding, thromboembolism, the pacemaker syndrome and some interactions with cardiac devices such as oversensing or transvenous lead dislodgment. From the societal implications, RFA improves patients’ recovery and allows them to be discharged from the clinic in 2-3 days so that it saves hospital resources, whereas CM requires the patients to stay in the hospital for 4 to 6 weeks. Conclusions. RFA with implanted cardiac devices is clinically effective and generally safe for the treatment of AFib in drug-resistant patients. Also, the health technology is potentially cost - effective and resource-saving for hospitals. Nonetheless, its clinical effects and economic implications in the long turn should be further investigated.
Zhandos L. Salpynov*1, https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9268-3296 Kamilla K. Gaitova1, Adlet B. Tabarov1, Zaid K. Zholdassov1, Tanja Novakovic2, Mark Parker2, https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6007-0842 Andrey V. Avdeyev3, https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8509-6053 1 The Republican state enterprise on the right of economic management «Republican Centre for Health Development» of the Ministry of Health of the Republic of Kazakhstan, Centre for Economics and Health Technology Assessment, Nur-Sultan, Republic of Kazakhstan; 2 ZEM Solutions, Belgrade, Serbia; 3 The Republican state enterprise on the right of economic management «Medical Center Hospital of the President’s Affairs Administration of the Republic of Kazakhstan», Nur-Sultan, Republic of Kazakhstan
1. Авдеев А. Одновременная радиочастотная абляция в сочетании с применением кардиологических устройств: заявка на проведение оценки медицинской технологии. Медицинский центр больницы управления делами Президента Республики Казахстан. 2016, С. 1-11. 2. Приказ Министра здравоохранения Республики Казахстан от 5 сентября 2018 года № ҚР ДСМ-10 Об утверждении тарифов на медицинские услуги, оказываемые в рамках гарантированного объема бесплатной медицинской помощи и в системе обязательного социального медицинского страхования, Адилет. С.1-956. 3. Республиканский центр электронного здравоохранения Министерства здравоохранения Республики Казахстан. Запрос на получение статистических данных. [Internet] - http://www.doc.rcrz.kz/workflow/document/view/6b2b2048-d849-4d77-8af9-527c5d8501c0/505cea80-3fc8-4877-97c6-5e9820510258?mydocuments. (accessed 22.04.2020). [in Russian] 4. Фибрилляция и трепетание предсердий. Клинический протокол № 32. Республиканский центр развития здравоохранения Министерства здравоохранения Республики Казахстан. [Internet] -https://diseases.medelement.com (accessed 22.04.2020). [in Russian] 5. Aronsson, M., Walfridsson, H., Janzon, M., Walfridsson, U., Nielsen, J., & Hansen, P. et al. The cost-effectiveness of radiofrequency catheter ablation as first-line treatment for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: results from a MANTRA-PAF substudy. EP Europace. 2014, 17(1), pp. 48-55. doi: 10.1093/europace/euu188 6. Atrial fibrillation ablation. Mayo Clinic. [Internet] - https://www.mayoclinic.org/tests-procedures/atrial-fibrillation-ablation/about/pac-20384969.(accessed 22.05.2020). [in English] 7. Avdeyev, A., Kamiyev, R., Smagulov, S., Mendykulov, S., Shanazarov, N., & Kaptagayeva, A. Simultaneous atrioventricular junction ablation and implantation of permanent pacing device for patients with drug-refractory tachystolic form of atrial fibrillation // Value In Health.2019, 22 (561). doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2019.09.832. 8. Darrat, Y., Morales, G., & Elayi, C. The Effects of Catheter Ablation on Permanent Pacemakers and Implantable Cardiac Defibrillators // Journal Of Innovations In Cardiac Rhythm Management. 2017, 8(3). pp. 2630-2635 doi: 10.19102/icrm.2017.080303. 9. Dunning, J., Nagendran, M., Alfieri, O., Elia, S., Kappetein, A., & Lockowandt, U. et al. Guideline for the surgical treatment of atrial fibrillation. European Journal Of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. 2013, 44(5), pp. 777-791. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezt413. 10. Ganesan, A., Brooks, A., Roberts-Thomson, K., Lau, D., Kalman, J., & Sanders, P. Role of AV Nodal Ablation in Cardiac Resynchronization in Patients With Coexistent Atrial Fibrillation and Heart Failure. // Journal Of The American College Of Cardiology. 2012, 59(8), pp. 719-726. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.10.891. 11. Jensen, S., Bergfeldt, L., & Rosenqvist, M. Long-Term Follow-Up of Patients Treated By Radiofrequency Ablation of the Atrioventricular Junction. Pacing And Clinical Electrophysiology. 1995, 18(9), pp. 1609-1614. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1995.tb06982.x 12. Jiang, Y., Tian, Y., Zeng, L., He, S., Zheng, Z., & Shi, L. et al. The safety and efficacy of hybrid ablation for the treatment of atrial fibrillation: A meta-analysis // PLOS ONE. 2018, 13(1). pp. 1-16. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0190170. 13. Kong, M., Lopes, R., Piccini, J., Hasselblad, V., Bahnson, T., & Al-Khatib, S.. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW: Surgical Maze Procedure as a Treatment for Atrial Fibrillation: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials // Cardiovascular Therapeutics. 2010, 28(5), pp. 311-326. doi: 10.1111/j.1755-5922.2010.00139.x. 14. Maze Procedure. BMC. [Internet] - https://www.bmc.org/cardiac-surgery/maze-procedure. (accessed 26.03.2020). [in English] 15. McClure, G., Belley-Cote, E., Jaffer, I., Dvirnik, N., An, K., & Fortin, G. et al.. Surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. EP Europace. 2017, 20(9), pp. 1442-1450. doi: 10.1093/europace/eux336. 16. McKenna, C., Palmer, S., Rodgers, M., Chambers, D., Hawkins, N., & Golder, S. et al. Cost-effectiveness of radiofrequency catheter ablation for the treatment of atrial fibrillation in the United Kingdom// Heart. 2008, 95(7), pp. 542-549. doi: 10.1136/hrt.2008.147165. 17. Noorani H.Z., Yee R., Marshall D., Connolly S., Nichol G., O'Brien B. Radiofrequency catheter ablation for cardiac arrhythmias: a clinical and economic review //Technology report № 25, Ottawa: Canadian Coordinating Office for Health Technology Assessment 2002, pp. 1-75. 18. Ruaengsri, C., Schill, M., Khiabani, A., Schuessler, R., Melby, S., & Damiano, R. The Cox-maze IV procedure in its second decade: still the gold standard? // European Journal Of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, 2018, 53(suppl_1), pp. i19-i25. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezx326. 19. Smith, M. (2020). Convergent Therapy for Atrial Fibrillation Treatment Birmingham AL.[Internet]-https://www.stop-af.com/treatment-options/convergent-therapy/(accessed 22.05.2020). [in English] 20. Sultan, A., Lüker, J., Andresen, D., Kuck, K., Hoffmann, E., & Brachmann, J. et al. Predictors of Atrial Fibrillation Recurrence after Catheter Ablation: Data from the German Ablation Registry. Scientific Reports. 2017, 7(1). p.1. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-16938-6. 21. Surgical Ablation: Convergent and Cox Maze IV. Oklahoma Heart Hospital [Internet] - https://www.okheart.com/about-us/ohh-news/surgical-ablation-convergent-and-cox-maze-iv (accessed 25.03.2020). [in English] 22. Surgical Thrombectomy. John Hopkins medicine. Health. [Internet]-https://www.hopkinsmedicine.org/health/treatment-tests-and-therapies/surgical thrombectomy (accessed 22.05.2020). [in English] 23. What is Atrial Fibrillation (AFib or AF). American Heart Association [Internet] - https://www.heart.org/en/health-topics/atrial-fibrillation/what-is-atrial-fibrillation-afib-or-af. (accessed 22.05.2020). [in English] 24. WHOQOL: Measuring Quality of Life. [Internet]- https://www.who.int/healthinfo/survey/whoqol-qualityoflife/en/index4.html (accessed 22.05.2020). [in English] 25. Wilton, S., Leung, A., Ghali, W., Faris, P., & Exner, D. Outcomes of cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with versus those without atrial fibrillation: A systematic review and meta-analysis // Heart Rhythm. 2011, 8(7), pp. 1088-1094. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2011.02.014. 26. Yang, Y., & Ortendahl, J. How does the Cox maze procedure compare? Cost-effectiveness analysis of alternative treatments of atrial fibrillation // Current Medical Research and Opinion. 2018, 35(6), pp. 957-961. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2018.1546681. References: 1. Avdeev A. Odnovremennaya radiochastotnaya ablyatsiya v sochetanii s primeneniem kardiologicheskikh ustrojstv: zayavka na provedenie otsenki meditsinskoi tekhnologii [Simultaneous radiofrequency ablation with the use of cardiac devices: dossier for health technology assessment]. Meditsinskii tsentr bol'nitsy upravleniya delami Prezidenta Respubliki Kazakhstan [Medical Center Hospital of the President’s Affairs Administration of the Republic of Kazakhstan]. 2016, pp. 1-11 [in Russian] 2. Prikaz Ministra zdravookhraneniya Respubliki Kazakhstan ot 5 sentyabrya 2018 goda № ҚR DSM-10 Ob utverzhdenii tarifov na meditsinskie uslugi, okazyvaemye v ramkakh garantirovannogo ob’ema besplatnoi meditsinskoi pomoshhi i v sisteme obyazatel'nogo sotsial'nogo meditsinskogo strakhovaniya, [On the approval of tariffs for medical services provided within the guaranteed volume of free medical care and the system of compulsory social health insurance]. Adilet. pp.1-956. [in Russian] 3. Respublikanskii tsentr elektronnogo zdravookhraneniya Ministerstva zdravookhraneniya Respubliki Kazakhstan. Zapros na poluchenie statisticheskikh dannykh. [Internet] [Republican Center for E-health of the Ministry of Health of the Republic of Kazakhstan. Statistical Data Request]. http://www.doc.rcrz.kz/workflow/document/view (accessed 22.04.2020). [in Russian] 4. Fibrillyatsiya i trepetanie predserdii. Klinicheskii protokol № 32. Respublikanskii tsentr razvitiya zdravookhraneniya Ministerstva zdravookhraneniya Respubliki Kazakhstan. [Internet] [Atrial flatter and fibrillation. Clinical Protocol № 32. Republican Center for Health Development of the Ministry of Health of the Republic of Kazakhstan] -https://diseases.medelement.com (accessed 22.04.2020). [in Russian] 5. Aronsson, M., Walfridsson, H., Janzon, M., Walfridsson, U., Nielsen, J., & Hansen, P. et al. The cost-effectiveness of radiofrequency catheter ablation as first-line treatment for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: results from a MANTRA-PAF substudy. EP Europace, 2014, 17(1), pp. 48-55. doi: 10.1093/europace/euu188. 6. Atrial fibrillation ablation. Mayo Clinic. [Internet] - https://www.mayoclinic.org/tests-procedures/atrial-fibrillation-ablation/about/pac-20384969. (accessed 22.05.2020). [in English] 7. Avdeyev A., Kamiyev R., Smagulov S., Mendykulov S., Shanazarov N., Kaptagayeva A. Simultaneous atrioventricular junction ablation and implantation of permanent pacing device for patients with drug-refractory tachystolic form of atrial fibrillation. Value In Health. 2019, 22 (561). doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2019.09.832. 8. Darrat Y., Morales G., Elayi C. The Effects of Catheter Ablation on Permanent Pacemakers and Implantable Cardiac Defibrillators. Journal Of Innovations In Cardiac Rhythm Management. 2017, 8(3). pp. 2630-2635. doi: 10.19102/icrm.2017.080303. 9. Dunning J., Nagendran M., Alfieri O., Elia S., Kappetein A., Lockowandt U. et al. Guideline for the surgical treatment of atrial fibrillation. European Journal Of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. 2013, 44(5), pp. 777-791. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezt413. 10. Ganesan A., Brooks A., Roberts-Thomson K., Lau D., Kalman J., Sanders P. Role of AV Nodal Ablation in Cardiac Resynchronization in Patients With Coexistent Atrial Fibrillation and Heart Failure. Journal Of The American College Of Cardiology. 2012, 59(8), pp. 719-726. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.10.891. 11. Jensen S., Bergfeldt L., Rosenqvist M. Long-Term Follow-Up of Patients Treated By Radiofrequency Ablation of the Atrioventricular Junction. Pacing And Clinical Electrophysiology. 1995, 18(9), pp. 1609-1614. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1995.tb06982.x 12. Jiang Y., Tian Y., Zeng L., He S., Zheng Z., Shi L. et al. The safety and efficacy of hybrid ablation for the treatment of atrial fibrillation: A meta-analysis. PLOS ONE. 2018, 13(1). pp.1-16. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0190170 13. Kong M., Lopes R., Piccini J., Hasselblad V., Bahnson T., Al-Khatib S. Systematic review: Surgical Maze Procedure as a Treatment for Atrial Fibrillation: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Cardiovascular Therapeutics. 2010, 28(5), pp. 311-326. doi: 10.1111/j.1755-5922.2010.00139.x 14. Maze Procedure. BMC. [Internet] -https://www.bmc.org/cardiac-surgery/maze-procedure. (accessed 26.03.2020). [in English] 15. McClure G., Belley-Cote E., Jaffer I., Dvirnik N., An K., Fortin G. et al. Surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. EP Europace. 2017, 20(9), pp. 1442-1450. doi: 10.1093/europace/eux336. 16. McKenna C., Palmer S., Rodgers M., Chambers D., Hawkins N., Golder S. et al. Cost-effectiveness of radiofrequency catheter ablation for the treatment of atrial fibrillation in the United Kingdom. Heart. 2008, 95(7), pp. 542-549. doi: 10.1136/hrt.2008.147165. 17. Noorani H.Z., Yee R., Marshall D., Connolly S., Nichol G., O'Brien B. Radiofrequency catheter ablation for cardiac arrhythmias: a clinical and economic review. Technology report № 25, Ottawa: Canadian Coordinating Office for Health Technology Assessment 2002, pp. 1-75. 18. Ruaengsri C., Schill M., Khiabani A., Schuessler R., Melby S., Damiano R. The Cox-maze IV procedure in its second decade: still the gold standard? European Journal Of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. 2018, 53(suppl_1),pp. i19-i25. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezx326. 19. Smith M. Convergent Therapy for Atrial Fibrillation Treatment Birmingham AL. 2020. [Internet] - https://www.stop-af.com/treatment-options/convergent-therapy (accessed 22.05.2020). [in English] 20. Sultan A., Lüker J., Andresen D., Kuck K., Hoffmann E., Brachmann J. et al. . Predictors of Atrial Fibrillation Recurrence after Catheter Ablation: Data from the German Ablation Registry. Scientific Reports. 2017, 7(1). p. 1. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-16938-6. 21. Surgical Ablation: Convergent and Cox Maze IV. Oklahoma Heart Hospital [Internet] - https://www.okheart.com/about-us/ohh-news/surgical-ablation-convergent-and-cox-maze-iv (accessed 25.03.2020). [in English] 22. Surgical Thrombectomy. John Hopkins medicine. Health. [Internet] - https://www.hopkinsmedicine.org/-health/treatment-tests-and-therapies/surgical-thrombectomy (accessed 22.05.2020). [in English] 23. What is Atrial Fibrillation (AFib or AF). American Heart Association [Internet] - https://www.heart.org/en/health-topics/atrial-fibrillation/what-is-atrial-fibrillation-afib-or-af. (accessed 22.05.2020). [in English] 24. WHOQOL: Measuring Quality of Life. [Internet] - https://www.who.int/healthinfo/survey/whoqol-qualityoflife/en/index4.html (accessed 22.05.2020). [in English] 25. Wilton S., Leung A., Ghali W., Faris P., Exner D. Outcomes of cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with versus those without atrial fibrillation: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Heart Rhythm. 2011, 8(7), pp. 1088-1094. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2011.02.014. 26. Yang Y., Ortendahl J. How does the Cox maze procedure compare? Cost-effectiveness analysis of alternative treatments of atrial fibrillation. Current Medical Research and Opinion. 2018, 35(6), pp. 957-961. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2018.1546681.
Количество просмотров: 474

Ключевые слова:

Категория статей: Обзор литературы

Библиографическая ссылка

Салпынов Ж.Л., Гаитова K.K., Taбаров A.Б., Жолдасов З.K., Новакович T., Паркер M., Aвдеев A.В. Оценка клинической и экономической эффективности радиочастотной абляции с имплантацией сердечных устройств у пациентов с фибрилляцией предсердий. Литературный обзор // Наука и Здравоохранение. 2020. 3 (Т.22). С. 32-41. doi:10.34689/SH.2020.22.3.006

Авторизируйтесь для отправки комментариев