PEER REVIEW ROUTINES IN «SCIENCE AND HEALTHCARE» JOURNAL
- All articles submitted to the journal go through a thorough double blind peer-review.
- The Executive Secretary of the Journal notifies the corresponding author about the receipt of the article within 5 working days.
- The Editor-in-Chief in cooperation with the Editorial Board assigns two reviewers for each manuscript
- The Executive Secretary of the Journal submits the manuscript the reviewers within 3 working days after the reviewers have been assigned.
- The first reviewer is an expert in the field that correlates with the topic of the submitted manuscript
- The second reviewer is assigned to evaluate research methodology and particularly the statistical analysis
- The reviewers submit written evaluation of the manuscript to the Executive Secretary of the Journal within 4 weeks.
- The following conclusions are expected from the reviewers: “Accept for publication in the present form”, “Accept for publication after minor revision” or “Major revision is required with subsequent re-assessment by the same reviewers”, “Reject”.
- The Executive Secretary informs the authors about the results of the peer review process.
- If the manuscript is rejected, the Executive Secretary provides a letter to the corresponding author with the reasons for refusal of the manuscript.
- Articles not recommended for publication by reviewers are not accepted for re-consideration.
- The Editorial Board makes the final decision on acceptance of each manuscript at monthly meetings.
- The Editorial Board reserves the right to reject articles that do comply to the Uniform Requirements for manuscripts.
- The Executive Secretary informs the author about the Editorial Board decision.
- The Editorial Board reserves the right to edit manuscripts without changing the content.
- All copies of both the manuscripts and peer reviews are stored in the Editorial Office.