Online ISSN: 3007-0244,
Print ISSN:  2410-4280
ЗЕРКАЛЬНАЯ ТЕРАПИЯ В ЛЕЧЕНИИ ФАНТОМНЫХ БОЛЕЙ. КЛИНИЧЕСКИЙ СЛУЧАЙ
Фантомная боль является распространенной проблемой у пациентов с ампутированными конечностями. Она может приводить к симптомам депрессии из-за своей хронизации и высокой интенсивности. Она препятствует протезной реабилитации и снижает качество жизни пациентов. Из-за сложного патогенеза общепринятого метода лечения фантомных болей не существует. В этой статье мы приводим случай использования зеркальной терапии в университетской клинике, положительный клинический результат которой был доказан в многочисленных исследованиях. Ключевые слова: фантомная конечность, фантомная боль, зеркальная терапия.
Айгерим А. Биниязова1, https://orcid.org/0009-0004-8111-8568 Талгат Н. Хайбуллин1, https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1886-0538 Наталья А. Филиппова1, https://orcid.org/0009-0007-5511-168X Асия Н. Алимханова1, https://orcid.org/0009-0007-2870-4033 Данагуль Ш. Жумагали1, https://orcid.org/0009-0009-6435-7416
1. Abdi S. Current understanding of phantom pain and its treatment. Pain physician. 2022. №. 25. С. e941-e957. 2. Amputee statistics you ought to know. (n.d.). https://Advancedamputees.Com/Amputee-Statistics-You-Ought-Know. Retrieved March 7, 2021, from https://advancedamputees.com/amputee-statistics-you-ought-know 3. Boesch E. et al. The effect of bodily illusions on clinical pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Pain. 2016. Т. 157. №. 3. С. 516-529. 4. Bowering K.J. et al. The effects of graded motor imagery and its components on chronic pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis. The journal of Pain. 2013. Т.14. №1. С. 3-13. 5. Boyers D. et al. Cost-effectiveness of self-management methods for the treatment of chronic pain in an aging adult population: a systematic review of the literature. The Clinical journal of pain. 2013. Т. 29. №.4. С. 366-375. 6. Campo-Prieto P., Rodríguez-Fuentes G. Effectiveness of mirror therapy in phantom limb pain: A literature review. Neurología (English Edition). 2022. Т.37. №.8. С. 668-681. 7. Carlen P.L. et al. Phantom limbs and related phenomena in recent traumatic amputations. Neurology. 1978. Т. 28. №. 3. С. 211-211. 8. Ephraim P.L. et al. Phantom pain, residual limb pain, and back pain in amputees: results of a national survey. Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation. 2005. Т. 86. №. 10. С. 1910-1919. 9. Fuchs X. et al. Psychological factors associated with phantom limb pain: a review of recent findings. Pain Research and Management. 2018. 5080123, №1 С. 12-24, 2018. 10. Herrador Colmenero L. et al. Effectiveness of mirror therapy, motor imagery, and virtual feedback on phantom limb pain following amputation: A systematic review. Prosthetics and orthotics international. 2018. Т. 42. №.3. С.288-298. 11. Hsu E., Cohen S.P. Postamputation pain: epidemiology, mechanisms, and treatment // Journal of pain research. 2013. С. 121-136. 12. Johnson M. I., Mulvey M. R., Bagnall A. M. Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) for phantom pain and stump pain following amputation in adults. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2015. №. 8. С. 1-22 13. Jutzeler C.R., Curt A., Kramer J.L.K. Relationship between chronic pain and brain reorganization after deafferentation: A systematic review of functional MRI findings. NeuroImage: Clinical. 2015. Т.9. С. 599-606. 14. Kalapatapu Venkat «Lower extremity amputation», UpToDate, Nov 29, 2022. https://www.uptodate.com/contents/lower-extremity-amputation?search=stump%20pain&source=search_result&selectedTitle=1~150&usage_type=default&display_rank=1 15. Kim S.Y., Kim Y.Y. Mirror therapy for phantom limb pain //The Korean journal of pain. 2012. Т. 25. №.4. С. 272. 16. McCabe C.S. et al. Simulating sensory–motor incongruence in healthy volunteers: implications for a cortical model of pain. Rheumatology. 2005. Т.44. №.4. С.509-516. 17. Modest J.M. et al. Management of post-amputation pain. Rhode Island medical journal. 2020. Т.103. №.4. С.19-22. 18. Nikolajsen L. et al. The influence of preamputation pain on postamputation stump and phantom pain. Pain. 1997. Т. 72. №. 3. С. 393-405. 19. Ramachandran V.S., Rogers-Ramachandran D. Mirror feedback assisted recovery from hemiparesis following stroke. In reply to Morkisch et al.: how to perform mirror therapy after stroke? Evidence from a meta-analysis. Restorative neurology and neuroscience. 2019. Т.37. №.5. С. 437-443. 20. Ramachandran V.S., Rogers-Ramachandran D. Synaesthesia in phantom limbs induced with mirrors. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences. 1996. Т. 263. №.1369. С. 377-386. 21. Rothgangel A.S. et al. The clinical aspects of mirror therapy in rehabilitation: a systematic review of the literature. International Journal of Rehabilitation Research. 2011. Т. 34. №. 1. С. 1-13. 22. Thieme H. et al. The efficacy of movement representation techniques for treatment of limb pain-a systematic review and meta-analysis. The journal of Pain. 2016. Т. 17. №.2. С. 167-180. 23. Wand B.M. et al. Seeing it helps: movement-related back pain is reduced by visualization of the back during movement //The Clinical journal of pain. 2012. Т. 28. №.7. С. 602-608. 24. Weeks S.R., Anderson-Barnes V.C., Tsao J.W. Phantom limb pain: theories and therapies. The neurologist. 2010. Т. 16. №. 5. С. 277-286. 25. Wittkopf P.G., Johnson M.I. Mirror therapy: A potential intervention for pain management. Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira. 2017. Т. 63. С. 1000-1005. 26. Ziegler-Graham K. et al. Estimating the prevalence of limb loss in the United States: 2005 to 2050. Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation. 2008. Т.89. №. 3. С.422-429.
Количество просмотров: 180

Ключевые слова:

Категория статей: Клинический случай

Библиографическая ссылка

Биниязова А.А., Хайбуллин Т.Н., Филиппова Н.А., Алимханова А.Н., Жумагали Д.Ш. Зеркальная терапия в лечении фантомных болей. Клинический случай // Наука и Здравоохранение. 2024. Т.26. (3). С. 210-214. doi 10.34689/SH.2024.26.3.024

Авторизируйтесь для отправки комментариев