ESTIMATION OF THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE DISTANCE EDUCATION MODEL BASED ON TONY BUZEN'S INTELLIGENCE CARDS OF STUDENTS AT THE DEPARTMENT OF CLINICAL AND RADIATION ONCOLOGY (FOR EXAMPLE BRAIN MENINGIOM).
Introduction: Тhe use of active forms of training in medical education becomes an integral part of the training of future specialists. One of these methods is the method of case-based learning (CBL)-learning based on the case (case), team – based learning (TBL) - a method of learning in groups. The training methods used involve various parts of the brain that are responsible for analyzing and processing information to a greater or lesser extent. The most fully involves all parts of the brain training method, which was developed by Tony Buzen-intelligence map. Intelligence map is a technology for displaying information in a graphical form; a tool that allows you to effectively structure information, think, using all your creative potential. The practical novelty of this work is the integration of various clinical and theoretical disciplines into a single whole within a single discipline.
The purpose of this work: to show the effectiveness of using the method of intelligence maps for the formation of students ' knowledge in distance learning.
Materials and methods: A lesson on the topic "brain Tumors (for example, brain meningiomas)" was held among 16 groups of the 5th year of OMF and 12 groups of the 6th year of internship in the specialty "General practitioner" of the nao "Semey Medical University". All groups are divided into 2 subgroups: control and experimental (8 groups of the 5th year and 6 groups of internship in each). To find out the opinion of students about the form of conducting classes in the form of intelligence cards, they were surveyed. The questionnaire is made up of a semi-closed type: with the presence of answer options and the possibility of your own wording.
Results and discussion: We suggested that using the method of intelligence maps can improve the efficiency and quality of the educational process at the Department. In General, 73.2% of students support the introduction of new, innovative teaching methods, and 67.3% of respondents are more satisfied with the abstract, compiled in the form of diagrams, than in the traditional, consistent form of presentation of the material. 65.9% of respondents find the main-map method interesting and facilitates the learning process.
Conclusions: From the above, we can conclude that the method of smart cards allows you to make the learning process exciting and interesting for students and is well suited for the educational process in educational medical institutions.
Alexandr V. Rakhimbekov1, https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3894-2397
Tasbolat A. Adylkhanov1, http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9092-5060
Bayan B. Beketova1,
Zhansaya Uagyzkhankyzy 1, http//orcid.org/0000-0003-3307-413X
Aidana M. Rakhmankulova 1, http//orcid.org/0000-0003-2698-9518
Korkem S. Salykbaeva 1, http//orcid.org/0000-0003-3398-3595
«Semey Medical University» NJSC, Semey city, Republic of Kazakhstan.
1. Адылханов Т.А., Байсалбаева А.С., Салыкбаева К.С., Жабагина А.С., Рахимбеков А.В. Свидетельство о внесение сведений в государственный реестр прав на объекты, охраняемым авторским правом «Модель преподавания в медицинских образовательных учереждениях путем интегрирования клинических дисциплин на основе интеллект карт Тони Бьюзена».- 2018 (свидетельство №913 от 11. 12.2018).
2. Бьюзен Т. Супермышление. – Пер. с англ. Е.А. Самсонов. – 4-е изд. – Мн.: Попурри, 2007. – 224с.
3. Бьюзен Т. Суперинтеллект. – Пер. с англ. Ю.Е. Андреева. – 3-е изд. – Мн.: Попурри, 2007. –400с.
4. Бьюзен Т. Умные родители – гениальный ребёнок. – Пер. с англ. С.А. Борович. – 3-е изд. – Мн.: Попурри, 2007. – 400с.
5. Бьюзен Т. Научите себя думать. – пер. с английского Герасимчик Ю.И. - Мн.: Попурри, 2014. – 224с
6. Найссер У. Познание и реальность. Смысл и принципы когнитивной психологии. – Благовещенск: БГК им. И.А. Бодуэна де Куртенэ, 1998. – 238с
7. Солсо Р.Л. Когнитивная психология. – Пер. Ссангл. – М.: Тривола, 1996. – 231с.
8. Холодная М.А. Психология интеллекта: парадоксы исследования. – Томск: Том. ун-т, 1997. – 294с.
9. Abdulhadi A. Alаmodi. Problem-based learning sessions and undergraduate research: a medical student's perspective and experience // Perspectives on Medical Education. - 2014. - Vol. 3, N 1. - P. 56-60.
10. Agustina Martinez-Garcia, Simon Morris, Michael Tscholl et al. Case-Based Learning, Pedagogical Innovation, and Semantic Web Technologies // Journal: IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies. 2012. Vol. 5, N 2. P. 104-116.
11. Baldi I., Engelhardt J., Bonnet C. et al. Epidemiology of meningiomas // Neurochirurgie. 2014. Sept. 20. Vol. 22. P.115.
12. Bunmi S. Malau-Aduli, Adrian Y.S. Lee, Nick Cooling et al. Retention of knowledge and perceived relevance of basic sciences in an integrated case-based learning (CBL) curriculum // BMC Medical Education. - 2013, October. Vol. 13. P.139.
13. Claus Andreas Foss Rosenstand Case-Based Learning. - Encyclopedia of the Sciences of Learning. – 2012. – Р. 503-506.
14. Elaine H., Yew J., Henk G. Schmidt What students learn in problem-based learning: a process analysis // Instructional Science. 2012. Vol. 40, N 2. P. 371-395.
15. Igissinov N., Akshulakov S., Rakhimbekov, et al. Malignant Tumors of the Central Nervous System in Kazakhstan: Component Analysis of Incidence Dynamics Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention, Vol 16, 2015 P.2289-2295
16. Jerome I. Rotgans, Glen O'Grady, W.A.M. Alwis Introduction: studies on the learning process in the one-day, one-problem approach to problem-based learning // Advances in Health Sciences Education. 2011. Vol. 16, N4. P. 443-448.
17. Kaitlyn Brown, Mary Commandant, Adi Kartolo et al. Case based learning teaching methodology in undergraduate health sciences // Interdisciplinary Journal of Health Sciences. 2011. Vol. 2. P. 47-65
18. Michaelsen L.K., Parmelee D.X., McMahon K.K., Levine R.E. Team-based learning for Health Professionas Education: A Guide to Using Small Groups for Improving Learning. Sterling, VA: Stylus.- 2008. 188p.
19. Ostrom Q.T., Gittleman H., Liao P. et al. CBTRUS statistical report: primary brain and central nervous system tumors diagnosed in the United States in 2007–2011 // Neuro-Oncology. 2014. Vol. 16, suppl. 4. P. iv1–63.
20. Ostrom Q.T., Gittleman H., Farah P. et al. CBTRUS statistical report: primary brain and central nervous system tumors diagnosed in United States, 2006–2010 // Neuro-Oncology. 2013. Vol. 15, suppl. 2. P.18-23
References:
1. Adylkhanov T.A., Baisalbaeva A.S., Salykbaeva K.S., Zhabagina A.S., Rakhimbekov A.V. Svidetel'stvo o vnesenie svedenii v gosudarstvennyi reestr prav na ob"ekty, okhranyaemym avtorskim pravom «model' prepodavaniya v meditsinskikh obrazovatel'nykh ucherezhdenii putem integrirovaniya klinicheskikh distsiplin na osnove intellekt kart Toni B'yuzena» [Certificate on entering information into the state register of rights to objects protected by copyright “model of teaching in medical educational institutions by integrating clinical disciplines based on the intelligence of Tony Buzan’s cards]. – 2018, (Svidetel'stvo №913 от 11. 12.2018). [in Russian].
2. B'yuzen T.i B. Supermyshlenie [Superthinking]. – Per. s angl. E.A. Samsonov. – 4-e izd. – Mn.: Popurri, 2007. – 224 p.] [in Russian].
3. B'yuzen T. Superintellekt [Superintelligence]. – Per. s angl. Yu. E. Andreeva. – 3-e izd. – Mn.: Popurri, 2007. –400p. [in Russian].
4. B'yuzen T. Umnye roditeli – genial'nyi rebenok [Smart parents - a brilliant child] – Per. s angl. S.A. Borovich. – 3-e izd. – Mn.: Popurri, 2007. – 400p. [in Russian].
5. B'yuzen T. Nauchite sebya dumat' [Teach yourself to think] – per. s angliiskogo Gerasimchik Yu.I. - Mn.: Popurri, 2014. – 224p. [in Russian].
6. Naisser U. Poznanie i real'nost'. Smysl i printsipy kognitivnoi psikhologii [Cognition and Reality. The meaning and principles of cognitive psychology] – Blagoveshchensk: BGK im. I.A. Boduena de Kurtene, 1998. – 238p. [in Russian].
7. Solso R.L. Kognitivnaya psikhologiya [Cognitive psychology]. – Per. Ssangl. – M.: Trivola, 1996. – 231p. [in Russian].
8. Kholodnaya M.A. Psikhologiya intellekta: paradoksy issledovaniya [Psychology of intelligence: the paradoxes of research]. Tomsk: Tom. un-ta, 1997. – 294p. [in Russian].
9. Abdulhadi A. Alamodi Problem-based learning sessions and undergraduate research: a medical student's perspective and experience. Perspectives on Medical Education. 2014. Vol. 3, N 1. - P. 56-60.
10. Agustina Martinez-Garcia, Simon Morris, Michael Tscholl et al. Case-Based Learning, Pedagogical Innovation, and Semantic Web Technologies. Journal: IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies. 2012. Vol. 5, N 2. P. 104-116.
11. Baldi I., Engelhardt J., Bonnet C. et al. Epidemiology of meningiomas. Neurochirurgie. 2014. Sept. 20.
12. Bunmi S. Malau-Aduli, Adrian Y.S. Lee, Nick Cooling et al. Retention of knowledge and perceived relevance of basic sciences in an integrated case-based learning (CBL) curriculum. BMC Medical Education. 2013, October. Vol. 13. P.139.
13. Claus Andreas Foss Rosenstand Case-Based Learning. - Encyclopedia of the Sciences of Learning. – 2012. – Р. 503-506.
14. Elaine H., Yew J., Henk G. Schmidt What students learn in problem-based learning: a process analysis. Instructional Science. 2012. Vol. 40, N 2. P. 371-395.
15. Igissinov N., Akshulakov S., Rakhimbekov. et al. Malignant Tumors of the Central Nervous System in Kazakhstan: Component Analysis of Incidence Dynamics. Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention, Vol 16, 2015. P.2289-2295
16. Jerome I. Rotgans, Glen O'Grady, W. A. M. Alwis Introduction: studies on the learning process in the one-day, one-problem approach to problem-based learning. Advances in Health Sciences Education. 2011. Vol. 16, N 4. P. 443-448.
17. Kaitlyn Brown, Mary Commandant, Adi Kartolo et al. Case based learning teaching methodology in undergraduate health sciences. Interdisciplinary Journal of Health Sciences. 2011. Vol. 2. P. 47-65
18. Michaelsen L.K., Parmelee D.X., McMahon K.K., Levine, R.E. Team-based learning for Health Professionas Education: A Guide to Using Small Groups for Improving Learning. Sterling, VA: Stylus.- 2008. 188p.
19. Ostrom Q.T., Gittleman H., Liao P. et al. CBTRUS statistical report: primary brain and central nervous system tumors diagnosed in the United States in 2007–2011. Neuro-Oncology. 2014. Vol. 16, suppl. 4. P. iv1–63.
20. Ostrom Q.T., Gittleman H., Farah P. et al. CBTRUS statistical report: primary brain and central nervous system tumors diagnosed in United States, 2006–2010. Neuro-Oncology. 2013. Vol. 15, suppl. 2. P.18-23
Number of Views: 220
Category of articles:
Medical education
Bibliography link
Rakhimbekov A.V., Adylkhanov T.A., Beketova B.B., Uagyzkhankyzy Zh., Rakhmankulova A.M., Salykbaeva K.S. Estimation of the effectiveness of the distance education model based on Tony Buzen's intelligence cards of students at the department of clinical and radiation oncology (for example brain meningiom) // Nauka i Zdravookhranenie [Science & Healthcare]. 2020, (Vol.22) 4, pp. 145-152. doi 10.34689/SH.2020.22.4.015Related publications:
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDES, AND BEHAVIOR IN EVIDENCE-BASED NURSING PRACTICE AMONG ACADEMIC AND APPLIED BACHELOR'S DEGREE STUDENTS
SYSTEMIZING INTERNATIONAL ACADEMIC EXCHANGES AND THE ENROLLMENT OF STUDY ABROAD STUDENTS AND SUSTAINING THAT APPROACH: SEEKING TO ESTABLISH FURTHER COOPERATIVE FRAMEWORKS IN SEMEY AND JAPAN (KOCHI AND HIROSHIMA)
ANALYSIS OF THE FINAL ASSESSMENT OF DISCIPLINES OF STUDENTS OF THE SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, DENTISTRY, PHARMACY AND NURSING IN 2022-2023 ACADEMIC YEAR
ANALYSIS OF THE FINAL ASSESSMENT OF DISCIPLINES OF STUDENTS OF THE SCHOOL OF MEDICINE IN 2022-2023 ACADEMIC YEAR
INTERPROFESSIONAL COLLABORATION IN PUBLIC HEALTH HIGH EDUCATION AND PERSPECTIVE OF FUTURE SPECIALISTS