COMPARATIVE EVALUATIONOF CHOLECYSTECTOMY TECHNIQUES
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.34689/fqbvsg45Keywords:
cholecystectomy , acute cholecystitis , mini-invasive cholecystectomy , laparoscopic cholecystectomy , gallstone , mini-assistantAbstract
Introduction: The review compares the efficacy and safety of mini-laporatomy, laparoscopy and
traditional cholecystectomy. We summarizes results of studies on advantages and disadvantages of
various methods of cholecystectomy with considering of after-operational complications, mortality,
average residence of patients in hospital and rehabilitation period.
The aim: to summarize and compare modern cholecystectomy techniques.
Materials and methods: Systematic review and subsequent analysis of publication data and online
sources were carried outusing PubMed, MEDLINE, books, publications, editions, opinions of national
and international scientists.
Results: Nowadays there are three main types of cholecystectomy: laparoscopic, traditional and
mini-invasive.
Conclusions: of the reviewed evidence suggests the superiority of mini-laparatomic
cholecystectomy.
References
Раимжанова А. Б. Сравнительная оценка различных способов холецистэктомии / / Наука и
Здравоохранение. 2016. №1. С. 40-53.
Raimzhanova A. B. Comparative evaluation of cholecystectomy techniques. Nauka i Zdravookhranenie
[Science & Healthcare]. 2016, 1, pp. 40-53.
Раимжанова А. Б. Холецистэктомияның әртүрлі әдістердің салыстырмалы бағалау / / Ғылым және
Денсаулық сақтау. 2016. №1. Б. 40-53.
Downloads
Published
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Айгерим Раимжанова (Автор)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.