Background: At present, more and more researchers are paying attention to the fact that during the treatment of cancer patients it is necessary to assess the quality of their life. There are many new data on the evaluation of the quality of life in cancer multicenter studies, in which the quality of life is the main criterion for assessing the effectiveness of treatment. The study of the quality of life allows you to obtain additional information about many aspects of the patient's condition, both before and during the treatment.

The goal is to make a comparative assessment of quality of life indicators in the traditional and hypofractionated regimens of radiotherapy for breast cancer.

Materials and methods. The design of the study is a sociological survey, a clinical trial. Data from a questionnaire survey of 160 patients with stage II and III C breast cancer were treated in the Regional Cancer Clinic in Semey, divided into two groups receiving either hypofractionated or traditional radiation therapy. The survey was carried out using official versions of the EORTC QLQ-C30 / BR23 questionnaires (a questionnaire approved by the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer in 2005). In the mathematical processing of survey results, the EORTC QLQ-C30 Scoring Manual for EORTC QLQ-C30 / BR23 was used. The reliability of the differences was assessed using the Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney method.

Results of the study. When considering differences in groups with traditional radiotherapy and hypofractionated radiotherapy in breast cancer patients, we found a statistically significant difference when comparing both the type of surgical intervention and the use of different regimens of radiation therapy, in scales - physical functioning, pain and symptoms of breast damage. Regarding the regimens of radiation therapy, since the frequency of radiation injuries with hypofractionated radiotherapy is lower than for traditional radiotherapy, this fact is reflected in the quality of life values (p = 0.43).

Conclusions. Patients who underwent radical mastectomy have a lower self-esteem compared to the group of patients with organ-preserving operations due to the non-acceptance of the body image (p = 0.05), which resulted in a decrease in sexual desire and sexual satisfaction.

The decline in quality of life due to pain compared to surgical treatment in groups is most likely due to the amount of intervention. At comparing this indicator in groups with organ-preserving and radical operative treatment, a statistically significant difference (p = 0.032) was established, and radical mastectomy leads to an increase in complaints of symptoms of tissue damage in hands 14.5 (20.9).

Regarding the regimes of radiation therapy, since the frequency of radiation damage in hypofractionated radiation therapy is lower than in traditional radiation therapy, this fact is reflected in the quality of life indicators (p = 0.43), in combination with organ-saving operations, the pain scale averaged 7.1 (16.4).

A comparative assessment of quality of life showed that the use of hypofractionated radiotherapy provides better quality of life.

Ainur S. Baissalbayeva, http//

Tasbolat A. Adylkhanov, http//

Yеvgeniya O. Kossymbayeva, http//

Semey State Medical University, Oncology and visual diagnostics department,

Semey, Kazakhstan;

1.         Al-Hayder S., Elberg J. J., Charabi B. Clinical outcome and health-related quality-of-life following microsurgical reconstruction in patients with oral and oropharyngeal cancer // Acta Otolaryngol. 2016. P. 1-5.

2.         Apolone G., Filiberti A., Cifani S., Ruggiata R., Mosconi P. Evaluation of the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire: a comparison with SF-36 Health Survey in a cohort of Italian long-survival cancer patients // Ann Oncol, 1998. Vol. 9, № 5. P. 549-557.

3.         Arraras J. I., Illarramendi J. J., Salgado E., de la Cruz S., Asin G., Manterola A., Ibanez B., Zarandona U., Dominguez M. A., Vera R. An evaluation study of the determinants of future perspective and global Quality of Life in Spanish long-term premenopausal early-stage breast cancer survivors // Contemp Oncol (Pozn). 2016. Vol. 20, № 2. P. 165-170.

4.         Bourdon M., Blanchin M., Tessier P., Campone M., Quereux G., Dravet F., Sebille V., Bonnaud-Antignac A. Changes in quality of life after a diagnosis of cancer: a 2-year study comparing breast cancer and melanoma patients // Qual Life Res. 2016. Vol. 25, № 8. P. 1969-1979.

5.         Bowling A. The effects of illness on quality of life: findings from a survey of households in Great Britain // J Epidemiol Community Health. 1996. Vol. 50, № 2. P. 149-155.

6.         Brennan M. E., Butow P., Spillane A. J., Boyle F. Patient-reported quality of life, unmet needs and care coordination outcomes: Moving toward targeted breast cancer survivorship care planning // Asia Pac J Clin Oncol. 2016. Vol. 12, № 2. P. e323-331.

7.         Canario A. C., Cabral P. U., de Paiva L. C., Florencio G. L., Spyrides M. H., Goncalves A. K. Physical activity, fatigue and quality of life in breast cancer patients // Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992). 2016. Vol. 62, № 1. P. 38-44.

8.         Chang O., Choi E. K., Kim I. R., Nam S. J., Lee J. E., Lee S. K., Im Y. H., Park Y. H., Cho J. Association between socioeconomic status and altered appearance distress, body image, and quality of life among breast cancer patients // Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2014. Vol. 15, № 20. P. 8607-8612.

9.         Chu W. O., Dialla P. O., Roignot P., Bone-Lepinoy M. C., Poillot M. L., Coutant C., Arveux P., Dabakuyo-Yonli T. S. Determinants of quality of life among long-term breast cancer survivors // Qual Life Res. 2016. Vol. 25, № 8. P. 1981-1990.

10.     Curran D., van Dongen J. P., Aaronson N. K., Kiebert G., Fentiman I. S., Mignolet F., Bartelink H. Quality of life of early-stage breast cancer patients treated with radical mastectomy or breast-conserving procedures: results of EORTC Trial 10801. The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC), Breast Cancer Co-operative Group (BCCG) // Eur J Cancer. 1998. Vol. 34, № 3. P. 307-314.

11.     de Morais F. D., Freitas-Junior R., Rahal R. M., Gonzaga C. M. Sociodemographic and clinical factors affecting body image, sexual function and sexual satisfaction in women with breast cancer // J Clin Nurs. 2016. Vol. 25, № 11-12. P. 1557-1565.

12.     Dobos G., Overhamm T., Bussing A., Ostermann T., Langhorst J., Kummel S., Paul A., Cramer H. Integrating mindfulness in supportive cancer care: a cohort study on a mindfulness-based day care clinic for cancer survivors // Support Care Cancer. 2015. Vol. 23, № 10. P. 2945-2955.

13.     Dow J., Kennedy Sheldon L. Breast Cancer Survivors and Sexuality: A Review of the Literature Concerning Sexual Functioning, Assessment Tools, and Evidence-Based Interventions // Clin J Oncol Nurs. 2015. Vol. 19, № 4. P. 456-461.

14.     Groenvold M., Klee M. C., Sprangers M.A., Aaronson N.K. Validation of the EORTC QLQ-C30 quality of life questionnaire through combined qualitative and quantitative assessment of patient-observer agreement // J Clin Epidemiol. 1997. Vol. 50, № 4. P. 441-450.

15.     Kaufmann A., Schmidt H., Ostheimer C., Ullrich J., Landenberger M., Vordermark D. Quality of life in very elderly radiotherapy patients: a prospective pilot study using the EORTC QLQ-ELD14 module // Support Care Cancer. 2015. Vol. 23, № 7. P. 1883-1892.

16.     Lanza M., Bergmann A., Ferreira M. G., de Aguiar S. S., Dias Rde A., Abrahao Kde S., Paltrinieri E. M., Allende R. G., de Andrade M. F. Quality of Life and Volume Reduction in Women with Secondary Lymphoedema Related to Breast Cancer // Int J Breast Cancer. 2015. Vol. 2015. P. 682-687.

17.     Leinert E., Singer S., Janni W., Harbeck N., Weissenbacher T., Rack B., Augustin D., Wischnik A., Kiechle M., Ettl J., Fink V., Schwentner L., Eichler M. The Impact of Age on Quality of Life in Breast Cancer Patients Receiving Adjuvant Chemotherapy: A Comparative Analysis From the Prospective Multicenter Randomized ADEBAR trial // Clin Breast Cancer. 2016. P. 547-552.

18.     Mackworth N., Fobair P., Prados M.D. Quality of life self-reports from 200 brain tumor patients: comparisons with Karnofsky performance scores // J Neurooncol. 1992. Vol. 14, № 3. P. 243-253.

19.     Spatuzzi R., Vespa A., Lorenzi P., Miccinesi G., Ricciuti M., Cifarelli W., Susi M., Fabrizio T., Ferrari M. G., Ottaviani M., Giulietti M. V., Merico F., Aieta M. Evaluation of Social Support, Quality of Life, and Body Image in Women with Breast Cancer // Breast Care (Basel). 2016. Vol. 11, № 1. P. 28-32.

20.     Spilker B. Standardisation of quality of life trials: an industry perspective // Pharmaco-economics. 1992. Vol. 1, № 2. P. 73-75.

21.     Spilker B., Molinek F. R., Jr., Johnston K. A., Simpson R. L., Jr., Tilson H. H. Quality of life bibliography and indexes // Med Care. 1990. Vol. 28, № 12 Suppl. 77 p.

22.     Van Dijck S., Nelissen P., Verbelen H., Tjalma W., Gebruers N. The effects of physical self-management on quality of life in breast cancer patients: A systematic review // Breast. 2016. Vol. 28. P. 20-28.

23.     Weitzner M. A., Meyers C. A. Cognitive functioning and quality of life in malignant glioma patients: a review of the literature // Psychooncology. 1997. Vol. 6, № 3. P. 169-177.

24.     Weitzner M.A., Meyers C.A., Steinbruecker S., Saleeba A.K., Sandifer S.D. Developing a care giver quality-of-life instrument. Preliminary steps // Cancer Pract. 1997. Vol. 5, № 1. P. 25-31.

25.     Weitzner M.A., Meyers C.A., Stuebing K.K., Saleeba A.K. Relationship between quality of life and mood in long-term survivors of breast cancer treated with mastectomy // Support Care Cancer. 1997. Vol. 5, № 3. P. 241-248.

26.     Zdenkowski N., Tesson S., Lombard J., Lovell M., Hayes S., Francis P. A., Dhillon H. M., Boyle F. M. Supportive care of women with breast cancer: key concerns and practical solutions // Med J Aust. 2016. Vol. 205, № 10. P. 471-475.

: 1860

Baissalbayeva A.S., Adylkhanov T.A., Kossymbayeva Yе.O. Comparative assessment of quality of life of patients in traditional and hypofractionated regimens of radiotherapy of breast cancer. Nauka i Zdravookhranenie [Science & Healthcare]. 2017, 4, pp. 71-.