ORGANIZATION OF PRIMARY HEALTH CARE FOR TYPE II DIABETES PATIENTS IN SELECTED OECD COUNTRIES
In this literature review we present international experience in organization of primary health care for Type II diabetic patients in different countries at various stages of economic development.
This is a semisystematic review of literature published in English language literature. Article search was performed using the following key words: «Type II diabetes», primary health care”, “OECD” using PubMed, Medline Complete, Wiley Online Library, SpringerLink, Google scholar, eLibrary, published from 2010 to 2017 годы. Also we studied program documents of the International Diabetic Federation and World Health Organization. Many countries have policies related to the management Type II diabetes. Although their relevance to Kazakhstan varies, international experience in some positive aspects of patient selection, differentiation and prioritization has a potential to improve the quality of primary health care.
Aigul Ye. Tazhiyeva , http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8983-1868
Vitaliy L. Reznik http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2776-6239
Andrej M. Grjibovski 3-6, http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5464-0498
1 Kazakhstan’s Medical University “KSPH”, Almaty, Kazakhstan;
2 Kazakh National University n.a. Al-Farabi, Almaty, Kazakhstan;
3 Northern State Medical University, Arkhangelsk, Russia;
4 Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Norway;
5 North-Eastern Federal University, Yakutsk, Russia;
6 International Kazakh- Turkish University, Turkestan, Kazakhstan.
Ali M.K., Singh K., Kondal D., Devarajan R., Patel S.A., Shivashankar R., Ajay V.S., Unnikrishnan A.G., Menon V.U. Effectiveness of a Multicomponent Quality Improvement Strategy to Improve Achievement of Diabetes Care Goals: A Randomized Controlled Trial // Ann Intern Med. . Vol. 20. P. 399-408.
American Diabetes Association Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes. Promoting Health and Reducing Disparities in Populations // Diabetes Care. 2017 Vol. 40 (Suppl. 1): P. 6-10.
Chevreul K., Brigham K., Bouché C. The burden and treatment of diabetes in France // Global Health. 2014. Vol. 10. P.6.
De Coster V.A. Challenges of type 2 diabetes and role of health care social work: a neglected area of practice // Health Soc Work .2001. Vol. 26. P. 26-37.
Derks I.P., Koster A., Schram M.T., Coen D.A., Stehouwer P.C., Dagnelie M., Boosma H. The association of early life socioeconomic conditions with prediabetes and type 2 diabetes: results from the Maastricht study // Int J Equity Health. 2017. Vol. 16. P. 61
Diabetes prevalence (% of population ages 20 to 79) International Diabetes Federation, Diabetes Atlas. http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SH.STA.DIAB.ZS?end=2015&locations=OEUS&name_desc=true&start=2015&view=bar) (Дата обращения: 10.06.2017)
Erwin P. Klein Wooltnuis Screening for type 2 diabetes mellitus, The Cochrane Library 2005 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD005266 http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/14651858.CD005266/full (Дата обращения: 12.07.2017)
Flood D., Douglas K., Goldberg V., Martinez B., Garcia P., Catherine Arbour M., Rohloff P. A quality improvement project using statistical process control methods for type 2 diabetes control in a resource-limited setting // Int J Qual Health Care 1-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzx051
Funakoshi M., Azami Y., Matsumoto H., Ikota A., Ito K., Okimoto H., Shimizu N., Tsujimura F., Fukuda H., Miyagi C., Osawa S., Osawa R., Miura J. Socioeconomic status and type 2 diabetes complications among young adult patients in Japan // PLoS One. 2017. Vol.12 P. e0176087.
Gillett M., Dallosso H.M., Dixon S. Delivering the diabetes education and self management for ongoing and newly diagnosed (DESMOND) programme for people with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes: cost effectiveness analysis // BMJ. 2010. Vol. 341. C. 4093.
Glasgow R.E., Nelson C.C., Whiteside H., King D.K. Use of the Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness care (PACIC) with diabetic patients // Diabetes Care. 2005. Vol. 28. P. 2655–2661.
Goldfracht M., Levin D., Peled O. Twelve-year follow-up of a populationbased primary care diabetes program in Israel // Int J Quality Health Care. 2011. Vol. 236. P. 674–681.
Greenfield S., Nicolucci A., Mattke S. Selecting indicators for the quality of diabetes care at the health systems level in OECD countries // Int J Qual Health Care. 2006. Vol. 18 (Suppl 1). P. 26-30.
Guidance National service framework: diabetes https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/national-service-framework-diabetes) (Дата обращения: 10.06.2017)
Haw J.S., Narayan K.M.V., Ali M.K. Quality improvement in diabetes—successful in achieving better care with hopes for prevention // Ann New York Acad Sci. 2015. Vol. 1353. P. 138–151.
Hinton W., Liyanage H., Mc Govern A., Liaw S.T., Kuziemsky C., Munro N., de Lusignan S. Measuring Quality of Healthcare Outcomes in Type 2 Diabetes from Routine Data: a Seven-nation Survey Conducted by the IMIA Primary Health Care Working Group. Primary Health Care Informatics Working Group Contribution to the Year Book of Medical Informatics 2017. https://doi.org/10.15265/IY-2017-005 (Дата обращения: 11.07.2017)
Innovating diabetes care in Turkey http://www.novonordisk.com/content/dam/Denmark/HQ/Sustainability/documents/blueprint-innovating-diabetes-care-in-turkey-uk.pdf (Дата обращения: 12.07.2017)
Knesebeck O., Gerstenberger E., Link C., Marceau L., Roland M., Campbell S., Siegrist J., Cruppé W., McKinlay J. Differences in the diagnosis and management of type 2 diabetes in three countries (US, UK and Germany): results from a factorial experiment // Medical Care. 2010. Vol. 48. P. 321–326.
Kringos D., Boerma W., Bourgueil Y. The strength of primary care in Europe: an international comparative study // Br J General Practice. 2013 Vol. 63. P. 742-750.
Kuh D., Ben-Shlomo Y., Lynch J., Hallqvist J., Power C. Life course epidemiology // J Epidemiol Community Health. 2003. Vol. 57. P. 778–783.
Lau I.T. Clinical Practice Guideline to Guide a System Approach to Diabetes Care in Hong Kong // Diabetes Metab J. 2017. Vol. 41. P. 81-88.
Macinko J., Guanais F.C. Population experiences of primary care in 11 Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development countries // Int J Qual Health Care. 2015. Vol. 6. P. 443-50.
OECD, Cardiovascular Disease and Diabetes: Policies for Better Health and Quality of Care, in OECD Health Policy Studies. 2015, OECD Publishing: Paris. P.-91 http://www.oecd.org/els/cardiovascular-disease-and-diabetes-policies-for-better-health-and-quality-of-care-9789264233010-en.htm) (Дата обращения: 10.06.2017)
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. OECD Health Policy Studies - Improving Value in Health Care: Measuring Quality. 2010. Available from http://www.oecd.org/health/measuringquality (Дата обращения: 10.06.2017)
Pihoker C., Forsander G., Wolfsdorf J., Klingensmith G.J. The delivery of ambulatory diabetes care: structures, processes, and outcomes of ambulatory diabetes care. Pediatr Diabetes 2008; 9:609-20.
Renders C.M., Valk G.D., Griffin S.J., Wagner E., van Eijk J.T.M., Assendelft W.J.J. Interventions to improve the management of diabetes mellitus in primary care, outpatient and community settings Intervention Review The Cochrane Library DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD001481
Rossi M.C.E., Lucisano G., Comaschi M., AMD-QUASAR Study Group. Quality of diabetes care predicts the development of cardiovascular events: results of the AMD-QUASAR study // Diabetes Care. 2011. Vol. 34. P. 347-352.
Schunk M., Reitmeir P., Rückert-Eheberg I.M., Tamayo T., Schipf S., Meisinger C., Peters A., Scheidt-Nave C., Ellert U., Hartwig S., Kluttig A., Völzke H., Holle R. Longitudinal change in health-related quality of life in people with prevalent and incident type 2 diabetes compared to diabetes-free controls // PLoS One. 2017. Vol.12. P. e0176895.
Stellefson M., Dipnarine K., Stopka C. The chronic care model and diabetes management in US primary care settings: a systematic review // Preventing Chronic Disease. 2013. Vol. 10. P. E26.
Stock S.A., Redaelli M., Lauterbach K.W. Disease management and health care reforms in Germany: does more competition lead to less solidarity? // Health Policy. 2007. Vol. 80. P. 86–96.
Suija K., Kivisto K., Sarria-Santamera A., Kokko S., Liseckiene I., Bredehorst M., Jaruseviciene L., Papp R., Oona M., Kalda R. Challenges of audit of care on clinical quality indicators for hypertension and type 2 diabetes across four European countries // Family Practice. 2015. Vol. 32. P. 69-74.
The AMD Annals 2010 Working Group & Cimino A, Fava D, Giorda CB et al. AMD Annals 2010: Quality Indicators in Diabetes Care in Italy. 2010. Available from: http://infodiabetes.it/files/Annali_2010_inglese_II.pdf (Дата обращения: 12.07.2017)
The diabetes epidemic and its impact on Europe. European diabetes leadership forum. Copenhagen. 2012
The Royal Australian College of General Practitioners. A systems approach to the management of diabetes: a guide for general practice networks. Melbourne: RACGP, 2010.
The World Bank Group, The State of Health Care Integration in Estonia. Summary Report. 2015, The World Bank Group; Estonian Health Insurance Fund
Tuffs A. Chronic disease management programmes are criticised by doctors // BMJ. 2002. Vol. 325. P. 356.
van Loenen T., Faber M.J., Westert G.P., van den Berg M.J. The impact of primary care organization on avoidable hospital admissions for diabetes in 23 countries // Scand J Primary Health Care. 2016. Vol. 34. P. 5-12
Bibliography link
Tazhiyeva A.Ye., Reznik V.L., Grjibovski A.M. Organization of primary health care for type II diabetes patients in selected OECD countries. Nauka i Zdravookhranenie [Science & Healthcare]. 2017, 5, pp. 88-98.