With the development of science and medicine in the modern world, there is an optimization of the tactics of perioperative management of patients in various areas of surgery, including colorectal. The use of optimized patient management tactics during surgical interventions reduces the number of postoperative complications, shortens the time spent in the hospital and accelerates the recovery process of patients. We conducted a review of published studies, after searching the Pubmed, EMBASE, Web of Science, Google Scholar database for the last 10 years. The conducted evaluation review of these studies shows that the introduction of accelerated recovery tactics during surgical operations helps to reduce the stress response of the body, reduce the recovery time. Some points of the program still need more solid evidence, but today the ERAS concept is generally considered effective and has been implemented in advanced surgical centers. However, there is no extensive data on the use of the program for accelerated recovery after surgery for chronic hemorrhoids. These data indicate the need for a comprehensive scientific study.
Dinara Nuspekova1, https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3577-907X Auyeskhan Dzhumabekov1, https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5817-8851 Aidos Doskaliev2, https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8727-567X Natal'ya Glushkova1, https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1400-8436 Nurlan Kemelkhanov3 1 Kazakhstan’s Medical University “Kazakhstan School of Public Health”, Almaty, the Republic of Kazakhstan; 2 National Center for Neurosurgery, Nur-Sultan c., Republic of Kazakhstan; 3 Central City Clinical Hospital of Almaty city, Almaty, the Republic of Kazakhstan.
1. Геморрой. Клинические протоколы Министерства здравоохранения Республики Казахстан - 2018. MedElement. доступно по https://diseases.medelement.com/disease/геморрой-2018/16135 (Accessed 23 February 2021). 2. Шелыгин Ю.А., Фролов С.А., Титов А.Ю., и др. Клинические рекомендации ассоциации колопроктологов России по диагностике и лечению геморроя. Колопроктология. 2019. 18(1(67)):7-38. https://doi.org/10.33878/2073-7556-2019-18-1-7-38 3. Aasa A., Hovbäck M., Berterö C.M. The importance of preoperative information for patient participation in colorectal surgery care // J. Clin. Nurs., vol. 22, no. 11–12, pp. 1604–1612, Jun. 2013, doi: 10.1111/jocn.12110. 4. Aloia T.A. et al. Enhanced recovery program implementation: an evidence-based review of the art and the science // Surg. Endosc., vol. 33, no. 11, pp. 3833–3841, Nov. 2019, doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-07065-6. 5. Botto F. et al. Myocardial Injury after Noncardiac Surgery: A Large, International, Prospective Cohort Study Establishing Diagnostic Criteria, Characteristics, Predictors, and 30-day Outcomes // Anesthesiology, vol. 120, no. 3, pp. 564–578, Mar. 2014, doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000000113. 6. Brandal D. et al. Impact of Enhanced Recovery after Surgery and Opioid-Free Anesthesia on Opioid Prescriptions at Discharge from the Hospital: A Historical-Prospective Study,” Anesthesia and Analgesia, vol. 125, no. 5. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, pp. 1784–1792, Nov. 01, 2017, doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000002510. 7. Ciapponi A., Tapia-López E., Virgilio S., Bardach A. The quality of clinical practice guidelines for preoperative care using the AGREE II instrument: A systematic review // Systematic Reviews, vol. 9, no. 1. BioMed Central, Jul. 13, 2020, doi: 10.1186/s13643-020-01404-8. 8. Davis B.R., Lee-Kong S.A., Migaly J., Feingold D.L., Steele S.R. The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Management of Hemorrhoids // Dis. Colon Rectum, vol. 61, no. 3, pp. 284–292, Mar. 2018, doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000001030. 9. Devereaux P.J. et al. Characteristics and short-term prognosis of perioperative myocardial infarction in patients undergoing noncardiac surgerya cohort study // Ann. Intern. Med., vol. 154, no. 8, pp. 523–528, 2011, doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-154-8-201104190-00003. 10. Elhassan A. et al. The Evolution of Surgical Enhanced Recovery Pathways: a Review // Current Pain and Headache Reports, vol. 22, no. 11. Current Medicine Group LLC 1, Nov. 01, 2018, doi: 10.1007/s11916-018-0727-z. 11. Elias K.M. Understanding Enhanced Recovery after Surgery Guidelines: An Introductory Approach // J. Laparoendosc. Adv. Surg. Tech., vol. 27, no. 9, pp. 871–875, Sep. 2017, doi: 10.1089/lap.2017.0342. 12. Feroci F. et al. Fast-track colorectal surgery: Protocol adherence influences postoperative outcomes // Int. J. Colorectal Dis., vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 103–109, Jan. 2013, doi: 10.1007/s00384-012-1569-5. 13. Forsmo H.M., Erichsen C., Rasdal A., Tvinnereim J.M., Körner H., Pfeffer F. Randomized Controlled Trial of Extended Perioperative Counseling in Enhanced Recovery After Colorectal Surgery // Dis. Colon Rectum, vol. 61, no. 6, pp. 724–732, Jun. 2018, doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000001007. 14. Gallo G.et al. Consensus statement of the Italian society of colorectal surgery (SICCR): management and treatment of hemorrhoidal disease // Techniques in Coloproctology, vol. 24, no. 2. Springer, pp. 145–164, Feb. 01, 2020, doi: 10.1007/s10151-020-02149-1. 15. Gramlich L.M. et al. Implementation of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery: A strategy to transform surgical care across a health system // Implement. Sci., vol. 12, no. 1, May 2017, doi: 10.1186/s13012-017-0597-5. 16. Grass F. et al. Feasibility of early postoperative mobilisation after colorectal surgery: A retrospective cohort study // Int. J. Surg., vol. 56, pp. 161–166, Aug. 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2018.06.024. 17. Grass F., Schäfer M., Demartines N., Hübnermartin M. Normal diet within two postoperative days—realistic or too ambitious? // Nutrients, vol. 9, no. 12, Dec. 2017, doi: 10.3390/nu9121336. 18. Gustafsson U.O. et al. Guidelines for Perioperative Care in Elective Colorectal Surgery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS®) Society Recommendations: 2018 // World Journal of Surgery, vol. 43, no. 3. Springer New York LLC, pp. 659–695, Mar. 15, 2019, doi: 10.1007/s00268-018-4844-y. 19. Kahokehr A., Sammour T., Zargar-Shoshtari K., Thompson L., Hill A.G. Implementation of ERAS and how to overcome the barriers // International Journal of Surgery, vol. 7, no. 1. Int J Surg, pp. 16–19, 2009, doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2008.11.004. 20. Keane C., Savage S., Mcfarlane K., Seigne R., Robertson G., Eglinton T. Enhanced recovery after surgery versus conventional care in colonic and rectal surgery // ANZ J. Surg., vol. 82, no. 10, pp. 697–703, Oct. 2012, doi: 10.1111/j.1445-2197.2012.06139.x. 21. Kehlet H., Wilmore D.W. Evidence-based surgical care and the evolution of fast-track surgery // Ann. Surg., vol. 248, №2, pp. 189–198, Aug. 2008, doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31817f2c1a. 22. Lassen K. et al. Consensus review of optimal perioperative care in colorectal surgery: Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS) Group recommendations // Archives of Surgery, vol. 144, no. 10. Arch Surg, pp. 961–969, Oct. 2009, doi: 10.1001/archsurg.2009.170. 23. Lohsiriwat V., Jitmungngan R. Enhanced recovery after surgery in emergency colorectal surgery: Review of literature and current practices // World J. Gastrointest. Surg., vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 41–52, Feb. 2019, doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v11.i2.41. 24. McLeod R.S. et al. Development of an enhanced recovery after surgery guideline and implementation strategy based on the knowledge-to-action cycle // Ann. Surg., vol. 262, no. 6, pp. 1016–1025, 2015, doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001067. 25. Melnyk M., Casey R.G., Black P., Koupparis A.J. Enhanced recovery after surgery (eras) protocols: Time to change practice? // Journal of the Canadian Urological Association, vol. 5, no. 5. Can Urol Assoc J, pp. 342–348, Oct. 2011, doi: 10.5489/cuaj.11002. 26. Napolitano L.M. Standardization of perioperative management: Clinical pathways // Surgical Clinics of North America, vol. 85, no. 6. Surg Clin North Am, pp. 1321–1327, Dec. 2005, doi: 10.1016/j.suc.2005.10.011. 27. Pearsall E.A. et al. Qualitative study to understand the barriers and enablers in implementing an enhanced recovery after surgery program // Ann. Surg., vol. 261, no. 1, pp. 92–96, 2015, doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000000604. 28. Pearsall E.A., McLeod R.S. Enhanced Recovery After Surgery: Implementation Strategies, Barriers and Facilitators // Surgical Clinics of North America, vol. 98, no. 6. W.B. Saunders, pp. 1201–1210, Dec. 01, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.suc.2018.07.007. 29. Pedziwiatr M. et al. Early implementation of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS®) protocol - Compliance improves outcomes: A prospective cohort study // Int. J. Surg., vol. 21, pp. 75–81, Sep. 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2015.06.087. 30. Pędziwiatr M. et al. Current status of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol in gastrointestinal surgery // Medical Oncology, vol. 35, no. 6. Humana Press Inc., Jun. 01, 2018, doi: 10.1007/s12032-018-1153-0. 31. Rauwerdink A. et al. Improving enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS): ERAS APPtimize study protocol, a randomized controlled trial investigating the effect of a patient-centred mobile application on patient participation in colorectal surgery // BMC Surg., vol. 19, no. 1, Sep. 2019, doi: 10.1186/s12893-019-0588-3. 32. Rawlinson A., Kang P., Evans J., Khanna A. A systematic review of enhanced recovery protocols in colorectal surgery // Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England, vol. 93, no. 8. Ann R Coll Surg Engl, pp. 583–588, Nov. 2011, doi: 10.1308/147870811X605219. 33. Segelman J., Nygren J. Best practice in major elective rectal/pelvic surgery: enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) // Updates in Surgery, vol. 69, no. 4. Springer-Verlag Italia s.r.l., pp. 435–439, Dec. 01, 2017, doi: 10.1007/s13304-017-0492-2. 34. Senturk J.C., Kristo G., Gold J., Bleday R., Whang E. The Development of Enhanced Recovery after Surgery Across Surgical Specialties // J. Laparoendosc. Adv. Surg. Tech., vol. 27, no. 9, pp. 863–870, Sep. 2017, doi: 10.1089/lap.2017.0317. 35. Shelygin Y.A., Achkasov S.I., Lukashevich I.V. Optimization of postoperative period in patients after colon resection // Hirurgia. 2015, doi: 10.17116/hirurgia2015476-81. 36. Siddiqui N.F. et al. Secular trends in acute dialysis after elective major surgery - 1995 to 2009 // CMAJ, vol. 184, no. 11, pp. 1237–1245, Aug. 2012, doi: 10.1503/cmaj.110895. 37. Sipos P., Ondrejka P. Fast-Track’ Colo-Rectal Surgery // Hungarian Med. J., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 165–174, Jun. 2007, doi: 10.1556/oh-hmj.2007.27996. 38. Studley H.O. Percentage of weight loss: Basic indicator of surgical risk in patients with chronic peptic ulcer // J. Am. Med. Assoc., vol. 106, no. 6, pp. 458–460, Feb. 1936, doi: 10.1001/jama.1936.02770060032009. 39. Thacker J. Overview of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery: The Evolution and Adoption of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery in North America // Surgical Clinics of North America, vol. 98, no. 6. W.B. Saunders, pp. 1109–1117, Dec. 01, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.suc.2018.07.016. 40. Uribe-Leitz T. et al. Projections for Achieving the Lancet Commission Recommended Surgical Rate of 5000 Operations per 100,000 Population by Region-Specific Surgical Rate Estimates // World J. Surg., vol. 39, no. 9, pp. 2168–2172, Sep. 2015, doi: 10.1007/s00268-015-3113-6. References: [1-2] 1. Gemorroi. Klinicheskie protokoly Ministerstva zdravookhraneniya Respubliki Kazakhstan – 2018 [Haemorrhoids. Clinical protocols of the Ministry of Health of the Republic of Kazakhstan - 2018]. MedElement. https://diseases.medelement.com/disease/gemorroi-2018/16135 (Accessed 23 February 2021) [ in Russian] 2. Shelygin Yu.A., Frolov S.A., Titov A.Yu., i dr. Klinicheskie rekomendatsii assotsiatsii koloproktologov Rossii po diagnostike i lecheniyu gemorroya [The Russian association of coloproctology clinical guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of hemorrhoids]. Koloproktologiya [Coloproctology]. 2019. 18(1(67)):7-38. https://doi.org/10.33878/2073-7556-2019-18-1-7-38 [in Russian]
Number of Views: 72

Key words:

Bibliography link

Nuspekova D., Dzhumabekov A., Doskaliev A., Glushkova N., Kemelkhanov N. Opportunities to optimize the tactics of perioperative management of patients with chronic hemorrhoids based on accelerated recovery programs. Literature review // Nauka i Zdravookhranenie [Science & Healthcare]. 2022, (Vol.24) 3, pp. 196-205. doi 10.34689/SH.2022.24.4.024

Авторизируйтесь для отправки комментариев