INTERVENTIONAL METHODS FOR THE PREVENTION OF COMPLICATIONS AFTER ENDOVASCULAR PROSTHETICS OF INFRARENAL AORTIC ANEURYSM: LITERATURE REVIEW
Introduction. The Republic of Kazakhstan has currently accumulated quite a lot of experience in performing endovascular interventions in patients with aneurysmal lesions of the infrarenal aorta. In the course of evaluating the long-term results of endovascular prosthetics, carried out in the framework of a number of scientific works, it was found that the most common complication that worsens the results of endovascular treatment of aneurysms is the development of endoleaks into the cavity of the aneurysmal sac after its isolation. Currently used methods of preventive embolization using metal coils and endovascular occluders show a high incidence of retrograde endoleaks and the development of high intermittent claudication (5.53% and 29.5%, respectively).
Purpose: Study the results of using interventional methods to prevent endoleaks after endovascular repair of infrarenal aortic aneurysms according to the literature.
Search strategy. During a literary search in Russian and English with a depth of 20 years (2002-2022) in databases and web resources PubMed (MEDLINE), eLIBRARY, Google Scholar, CyberLeninka (CYBERLENINKA) using the keywords: "EVAR", " Endoleak, EVPBA, endoleak, 347 literature sources were found, from which 67 were selected that met the inclusion criteria: reports on randomized and cohort studies, systematic reviews and meta-analyses, diagnostic and treatment protocols. Exclusion criteria: newspaper publications, descriptions of clinical cases, abstracts, personal messages, as well as sources containing duplication or repetition of information. In some cases, links are given to earlier publications that have historical value in the issue under study.
Results. The review material describes the early and long-term results of endovascular repair of infrarenal aneurysms, outlines the most common complications that worsen the results of treatment. The dynamics of changes in the results of surgical interventions with the accumulation of experience and the development of new generations of endovascular devices is reflected.
Conclusions. When studying the long-term results of endovascular prosthetics and open reconstructive interventions, no difference in survival was found. In this regard, one of the main tasks facing a modern vascular and endovascular surgeon in the surgical treatment of infrarenal aneurysms is the development and application of measures to prevent possible complications, which, ultimately, will improve the results of treatment of this category of patients. The issue of prevention and control of complications of endovascular prosthesis considered in this article showed insufficient development of the topic in terms of improving the results of surgical interventions.
Viktor V. Zemlyanskiy1,2, https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2458-8086
Natalya S. Zemlyanskaya1, https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1968-3246
Tokan А. Sultanaliev3, https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1732-9489
Tairkhan B. Dautov2, https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5267-0108
Saken K. Kozhakhmetov1, https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0075-0376
Vladimir G. Openko1, https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0786-2896
1 NJSC "Astana Medical University", Astana, Republic of Kazakhstan;
2 Corporate Fund "University Medical Center", Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Astana, Republic of Kazakhstan;
3 National Scientific Cancer Center, Center for Vascular Surgery, Astana, Republic of Kazakhstan.
1. Абугов С. А. и др. Клинические рекомендации по диагностике и лечению заболеваний аорты // Кардиология и сердечно-сосудистая хирургия. 2018. Том 1, №11 С. 7–67. URL: https://www.mediasphera.ru/issues/kardiologiya-i-serdechno-sosudistaya-khirurgiya/2018/1/1199663852018011007 (дата обращения: 10.12.2022).
2. Бокерия Л.А. и др. Национальные рекомендации по ведению пациентов с аневризмами брюшной аорты // Ангиология и сосудистая хирургия. 2013. С. 5–72. URL: https://www.mrckb.ru/files/recommendations_AAA.pdf (дата обращения: 10.12.2022).
3. Дюсупов А.А. Профилактика осложнений хирургического лечения инфраренальной аневризмы аорты: дис. доктора мед. наук: 14.01.26 - Новосибирск, 2017. URL: https://www.meshalkin.ru/uploads/disser_DusupovAA_full_text_published_04_04_2017.pdf (дата обращения: 10.12.2022).
4. Мозговой П.В. и др. Результаты эндоваскуляр-ного протезирования у пациентов с аневризмами инфраренальной аорты // Вестник Волгоградского государственного медицинского университета. 2020. Том 74, № 2. С. 135–138. URL: https://doi.org/10.19163/1994-9480-2020-2(74)-135-138 (дата обращения: 10.12.2022).
5. Хубулава Г.Г., Светликов А.В. Николай Леонтьевич Володось. История неоспоримого мирового приоритета в изобретении сосудистого эндопротеза // Вестник хирургии имени И.И. Грекова. 2017. Том 176, №3. С. 95-98. URL: https://doi.org/10.24884/0042-4625-2017-176-3-95-98 (дата обращения: 09.12.2022).
6. Abdulameer H. et al. Epidemiology of fatal ruptured aortic aneurysms in the United States (1999-2016) // Journal of Vascular Surgery. 2019. Volume 69, № 2. P. 378–384. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JVS.2018.03.435 (дата обращения: 09.12.2022).
7. Abularrage C.J. et al. Preoperative variables predict persistent type 2 endoleak after endovascular aneurysm repair // Journal of vascular surgery. 2010. Volume 52, №1. P.19–24. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JVS.2010.02.023 (дата обращения: 09.12.2022).
8. Alexander H.C. et al. Reporting of Clinical Outcomes After Endovascular Aortic Aneurysm Repair: A Systematic Review // Annals of Vascular Surgery. 2021. Volume 77. P. 306–314. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avsg.2021.06.006 (дата обращения: 09.12.2022).
9. Anderson P.L. et al. A statewide experience with endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: Rapid diffusion with excellent early results // Journal of Vascular Surgery. 2004. Volume 39, № 1. P. 10–18. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JVS.2003.07.020 (дата обращения: 09.12.2022).
10. Balko A. et al. Transfemoral placement of intraluminal polyurethane prosthesis for abdominal aortic aneurysm // The Journal of surgical research. 1986. Volume 40, № 4. P. 305–309. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-4804(86)90191-5 (дата обращения: 09.12.2022).
11. Baum R.A. et al. Translumbar embolization of type 2 endoleaks after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms // Journal of vascular and interventional radiology: JVIR. 2001. Volume 12, № 1. P. 111–116. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1051-0443(07)61412-2 (дата обращения: 09.12.2022).
12. Baum R.A. et al. Treatment of type 2 endoleaks after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms: comparison of transarterial and translumbar techniques // Journal of vascular surgery. 2002. Volume 35, № 1. P. 23–29. URL: https://doi.org/10.1067/MVA.2002.121068 (дата обращения: 09.12.2022).
13. Becquemin J.P. et al. Colon ischemia following abdominal aortic aneurysm repair in the era of endovascular abdominal aortic repair // Journal of Vascular Surgery. 2008. Volume 47, № 2. P. 258–263. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JVS.2007.10.001 (дата обращения: 09.12.2022).
14. Berg H.R. Van Den, Leijdekkers V.J., Vahl A. Aortic stent-graft infection following septic complications of a kidney stone // Cardiovascular and interventional radiology. 2006. Volume 29, № 3. P. 443–445. URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/S00270-005-0028-X (дата обращения: 09.12.2022).
15. Berg P. et al. Spinal cord ischaemia after stent-graft treatment for infra-renal abdominal aortic aneurysms. Analysis of the Eurostar database // European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery: the official journal of the European Society for Vascular Surgery. 2001. Volume 22, № 4. P. 342–347. URL: https://doi.org/10.1053/EJVS.2001.1470 (дата обращения: 09.12.2022).
16. Bharwani N. et al. Is internal iliac artery embolization essential prior to endovascular repair of aortoiliac aneurysms? // Cardiovascular and interventional radiology. 2008. Volume 31, № 3. P. 504–508. URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/S00270-007-9260-X (дата обращения: 09.12.2022).
17. Boks S.S. et al. Ultrasound-guided percutaneous transabdominal treatment of a type 2 endoleak // Cardiovascular and interventional radiology. 2005. Volume 28, № 4. P. 526–529. URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/S00270-003-0151-5 (дата обращения: 09.12.2022).
18. Bosanquet D.C. et al. Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of the Effect of Internal Iliac Artery Exclusion for Patients Undergoing EVAR // European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery. 2017. Volume 53, № 4. P. 534–548. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejvs.2017.01.009 (дата обращения: 09.12.2022).
19. Brountzos E. et al. Risk factors for the development of persistent type II endoleaks after endovascular repair of infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms // Diagnostic and interventional radiology (Ankara, Turkey). 2012. Volume 18, № 3. P. 307–313. URL: https://doi.org/10.4261/1305-3825.DIR.4646-11.1 (дата обращения: 09.12.2022).
20. Carpenter J.P. et al. Durability of benefits of endovascular versus conventional abdominal aortic aneurysm repair // Journal of Vascular Surgery. 2002. Volume 35, № 2. P. 222–228. URL: https://doi.org/10.1067/MVA.2002.120034 (дата обращения: 09.12.2022).
21. Carroccio A. et al. Predicting iliac limb occlusions after bifurcated aortic stent grafting: anatomic and device-related causes // Journal of Vascular Surgery. 2002. Volume 36, № 4. P. 679–684. URL: https://doi.org/10.1067/mva.2002.128309 (дата обращения: 09.12.2022).
22. Chaikof E.L. et al. Reporting standards for endovascular aortic aneurysm repair // Journal of vascular surgery. 2002. Volume 35, № 5. P. 1048–1060. URL: https://doi.org/10.1067/MVA.2002.123763 (дата обращения: 09.12.2022).
23. Criado F.J. EVAR at 20: the unfolding of a revolutionary new technique that changed everything // Journal of endovascular therapy: an official journal of the International Society of Endovascular Specialists. 2010. Volume 17, № 6. P. 789–796. URL: https://doi.org/10.1583/10-3291.1 (дата обращения: 09.12.2022).
24. Criado F.J. Nicholay Volodos and the origins of endovascular grafts // Journal of endovascular therapy: an official journal of the International Society of Endovascular Specialists. 2012. Volume 19, № 4. P. 568–569. URL: https://doi.org/10.1583/12-3972L.1 (дата обращения: 09.12.2022).
25. Daye D., Walker T.G. Complications of endovascular aneurysm repair of the thoracic and abdominal aorta: evaluation and management // Cardiovascular Diagnosis and Therapy. 2018. Volume 8, № Suppl 1. P. S138. URL: https://doi.org/10.21037/CDT.2017.09.17 (дата обращения: 09.12.2022).
26. Dijk L. C. V. et al. Partial blockage of the renal artery ostium after stent-graft placement: detection and treatment // Cardiovascular Diagnosis and Therapy. 2003. Volume 10, № 3. P. 684. https://doi.org/10.1177/152660280301000343 (дата обращения: 09.12.2022).
27. Farahmand P. et al. Is hypogastric artery embolization during endovascular aortoiliac aneurysm repair (EVAR) innocuous and useful? // European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery: the official journal of the European Society for Vascular Surgery. 2008. Volume 35, № 4. P. 429–435. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/J.EJVS.2007.12.001 (дата обращения: 09.12.2022).
28. Faries P.L. et al. Management of endoleak after endovascular aneurysm repair: Cuffs, coils, and conversion // Journal of Vascular Surgery. 2003. Volume 37, № 6. P. 1155–1161. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0741-5214(03)00084-3 (дата обращения: 09.12.2022).
29. Franks S.C. et al. Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of 12 Years of Endovascular Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair // European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery. 2007. Volume 33, № 2. P. 154–171. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/J.EJVS.2006.10.017 (дата обращения: 09.12.2022).
30. Gorich J. et al. Malpositioned or dislocated aortic endoprostheses: repositioning using percutaneous pull-down maneuvers // Journal of endovascular therapy: an official journal of the International Society of Endovascular Specialists. 2000. Volume 7, № 2. P. 123–131. URL: https://doi.org/10.1177/152660280000700206 (дата обращения: 09.12.2022).
31. Greenhalgh R.M. Endovascular aneurysm repair and outcome in patients unfit for open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm (EVAR trial 2): randomised controlled trial // Lancet (London, England). 2005. Volume 365, № 9478. P. 2187–2192. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(05)66628-7 (дата обращения: 09.12.2022).
32. Guo Q. et al. Prevalence and risk factors of type II endoleaks after endovascular aneurysm repair: A meta-analysis // PLOS ONE. 2017. Volume 12, № 2. P. e0170600. URL: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0170600 (дата обращения: 09.12.2022).
33. Henretta J.P. et al. Special iliac artery considerations during aneurysm endografting // American journal of surgery. 1999. Volume 178, № 3. P. 212–218. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9610(99)00156-7 (дата обращения: 09.12.2022).
34. Kasthuri R.S., Stivaros S.M., Gavan D. Percutaneous ultrasound-guided thrombin injection for endoleaks: An alternative // CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology. 2005. Volume 28, № 1. P. 110–112. URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/S00270-004-0149-7 (дата обращения: 09.12.2022).
35. Kelso R.L. et al. Late conversion of aortic stent grafts // Journal of Vascular Surgery. 2009. Volume 49, № 3. P. 589–595. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JVS.2008.10.020 (дата обращения: 09.12.2022).
36. Kouvelos G.N. et al. Outcome after Interruption or Preservation of Internal Iliac Artery Flow During Endovascular Repair of Abdominal Aorto-iliac Aneurysms // European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery: the official journal of the European Society for Vascular Surgery. 2016. Volume 52, № 5. P. 621–634. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/J.EJVS.2016.07.081 (дата обращения: 09.12.2022).
37. Kouvelos G.N. et al. Toward an EVAR Prevention Strategy for Type II Endoleak // Journal of endovascular therapy: an official journal of the International Society of Endovascular Specialists. 2017. Volume 24, № 4. P. 573–574. URL: https://doi.org/10.1177/1526602817712593 (дата обращения: 09.12.2022).
38. Lancaster E.M. et al. The natural history of large abdominal aortic aneurysms in patients without timely repair // Journal of Vascular Surgery. 2022. Volume 75, № 1. P. 109–117. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2021.07.125 (дата обращения: 09.12.2022).
39. Lazarus H. Intraluminal graft device, system and method. US рatent 4 787 899 // 1988.
40. Lederle F.A. et al. Outcomes following endovascular vs open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm: a randomized trial // JAMA. 2009. Volume 302, № 14. P. 1535–1542. URL: https://doi.org/10.1001/JAMA.2009.1426 (дата обращения: 09.12.2022).
41. Lilja F., Wanhainen A., Mani K. Changes in abdominal aortic aneurysm epidemiology // The Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery. 2017. Volume 58, № 6. P. 848–853. URL: https://doi.org/10.23736/S0021-9509.17.10064-9 (дата обращения: 09.12.2022).
42. Maeda T. et al. Risk factors for a persistent type 2 endoleak after endovascular aneurysm repair // Surgery today. 2015. Volume 45, № 11. P. 1373–1377. URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/S00595-014-1070-6 (дата обращения: 09.12.2022).
43. Makaroun M. et al. Fate of endoleaks after endoluminal repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms with the EVT device // European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery: the official journal of the European Society for Vascular Surgery. 1999. Volume 18, № 3. P. 185–190. URL: https://doi.org/10.1053/EJVS.1998.0807 (дата обращения: 09.12.2022).
44. Maleux G. et al. Limb occlusion after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms with supported endografts // Journal of vascular and interventional radiology: JVIR. 2008. Volume 19, № 10. P. 1409–1412. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JVIR.2008.07.005 (дата обращения: 09.12.2022).
45. McGarry J.G. et al. How safe is internal iliac artery embolisation prior to EVAR? A 10-year retrospective review // Irish Journal of Medical Science. 2016. Volume 185, № 4. P. 865–869. URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/S11845-015-1384-4 (дата обращения: 09.12.2022).
46. Mehta M. Hypogastric Interruption during Endovascular Aneurysm Repair Is Relatively Safe with Iliac Aneurysms: When Is It Not and When Should Revascularization Be Attempted? // Vascular. 2005. Volume 13, № SUPPL. 1. P. S117-S118. URL: https://www.aimsymposium.org/veithpdf2005/211.pdf (дата обращения: 09.12.2022).
47. Meuli L. et al. Prognostic model for survival of patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms treated with endovascular aneurysm repair // Scientific Reports. 2022. Volume 12, № 1. P. 19540. URL: https://doi.org/10.1038/S41598-022-24060-5 (дата обращения: 09.12.2022).
48. Patel S.R. et al. A Systematic Review of Predictors of Reintervention After EVAR: Guidance for Risk-Stratified Surveillance // Vascular and endovascular surgery. 2017. Volume 51, № 6. P. 417–428. URL: https://doi.org/10.1177/1538574417712648 (дата обращения: 09.12.2022).
49. Raju S. et al. Endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm in octogenarians: clinical outcomes and complications // Canadian Journal of Surgery. 2020. Volume 63, № 4. P. E329. URL: https://doi.org/10.1503/CJS.009019 (дата обращения: 09.12.2022).
50. Resch T. et al. Persistent collateral perfusion of abdominal aortic aneurysm after endovascular repair does not lead to progressive change in aneurysm diameter // Journal of vascular surgery. 1998. Volume 28, № 2. P. 242–249. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0741-5214(98)70160-0 (дата обращения: 09.12.2022).
51. Samy A.K., Murray G., MacBain G. Prospective evaluation of the Glasgow Aneurysm Score // Journal of the Royal College of Surgeons of Edinburgh. 1996. Volume 41, № 2. P. 105–107. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8632380/ (дата обращения: 09.12.2022).
52. Schermerhorn M.L. et al. Endovascular vs. open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms in the Medicare population // The New England journal of medicine. 2008. Volume 358, № 5. P. 464–474. URL: https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMOA0707348 (дата обращения: 09.12.2022).
53. Schlösser F.J.V. et al. Aneurysm Rupture after EVAR: Can the Ultimate Failure be Predicted? // European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery. 2009. Volume 37, № 1. P. 15–22. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/J.EJVS.2008.10.011 (дата обращения: 09.12.2022).
54. Sharma A., Sethi P., Gupta K. Endovascular Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair // Interventional cardiology clinics. 2020. Volume 9, № 2. P. 153–168. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ICCL.2019.12.005 (дата обращения: 09.12.2022).
55. Sheehan M.K. et al. Effectiveness of coiling in the treatment of endoleaks after endovascular repair // Journal of vascular surgery. 2004. Volume 40, № 3. P. 430–434. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JVS.2004.06.034 (дата обращения: 09.12.2022).
56. Sidloff D.A. et al. Type II endoleak after endovascular aneurysm repair // The British journal of surgery. 2013. Volume 100, № 10. P. 1262–1270. URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/BJS.9181 (дата обращения: 09.12.2022).
57. Sjögren B. et al. Sexual function in women suffering from aortoiliac occlusive disease // European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery: the official journal of the European Society for Vascular Surgery. 1999. Volume 17, № 4. P. 306–312. URL: https://doi.org/10.1053/EJVS.1998.0770 (дата обращения: 09.12.2022).
58. Stavropoulos S.W. et al. Inferior vena cava traversal for translumbar endoleak embolization after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair // Journal of vascular and interventional radiology: JVIR. 2003. Volume 14, № 9 Pt 1. P. 1191–1194. URL: https://doi.org/10.1097/01.RVI.0000085771.71254.14 (дата обращения: 09.12.2022).
59. Summers K.L. et al. Evaluating the prevalence of abdominal aortic aneurysms in the United States through a national screening database // Journal of vascular surgery. 2021. Volume 73, № 1. P. 61–68. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JVS.2020.03.046 (дата обращения: 09.12.2022).
60. Unno N. et al. Preservation of pelvic circulation with hypogastric artery bypass in endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm with bilateral iliac artery aneurysms // Journal of vascular surgery. 2006. Volume 44, № 6. P. 1170–1175. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JVS.2006.08.011 (дата обращения: 09.12.2022).
61. Veith F.J. et al. Nature and significance of endoleaks and endotension: summary of opinions expressed at an international conference // Journal of vascular surgery. 2002. Volume 35, № 5. P. 1029–1035. URL: https://doi.org/10.1067/MVA.2002.123095 (дата обращения: 09.12.2022).
62. Vogel T.R., Symons R., Flum D.R. The incidence and factors associated with graft infection after aortic aneurysm repair // Journal of vascular surgery. 2008. Volume 47, № 2. P. 264–269. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JVS.2007.10.030 (дата обращения: 09.12.2022).
63. Volodos N.L. The 30th anniversary of the first clinical application of endovascular stentgrafting // European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery. 2015. Volume 49, № 5. P. 495–497. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejvs.2015.02.012 (дата обращения: 10.12.2022).
64. White G.H. et al. Type I and Type II endoleaks: a more useful classification for reporting results of endoluminal AAA repair // Journal of Endovascular Surgery: The Official Journal of the International Society for Endovascular Surgery. 1998. Volume 5, № 2. P. 189–191. URL: https://doi.org/10.1177/152660289800500212 (дата обращения: 10.12.2022).
65. White G.H. et al. Type III and type IV endoleak: toward a complete definition of blood flow in the sac after endoluminal AAA repair // Journal of Endovascular Surgery: The Official Journal of the International Society for Endovascular Surgery. 1998. Volume 5, № 4. P. 305–309. URL: https://doi.org/10.1177/152660289800500403 (дата обращения: 10.12.2022).
66. Wu Z. et al. Preliminary embolization of the hypogastric artery to expand the applicability of endovascular aneurysm repair // Journal of endovascular therapy: an official journal of the International Society of Endovascular Specialists. 2011. Volume 18, № 1. P. 114–120. URL: https://doi.org/10.1583/10-3223.1 (дата обращения: 09.12.2022).
67. Yu H.Y. et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of prophylactic aortic side branch embolization to prevent type II endoleaks // Journal of Vascular Surgery. 2020. Volume 72, № 5. P. 1783–1792. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2020.05.020 (дата обращения: 09.12.2022).
Reference: [1-5]
1. Abugov S.A. et al. Klinicheskie rekomendatsii po diagnostike i lecheniju zabolevanii aorty [Clinical guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of aortic diseases]. Kardiologiya i serdechno-sosudistaya khirurgiya [Cardiology and Cardiovascular Surgery] 2018. Volume 1, № 11. P. 7–67. URL: https://www.mediasphera.ru/issues/kardiologiya-i-serdechno-sosudistaya-khirurgiya/2018/1/1199663852018011007 (accessed: 10.12.2022) [in Russian]
2. Bokeria L. A. et al. Natsional'nye rekomendatsii po vedeniyu patsientov s anevrizmami bryushnoi aorty [National guidelines for the management of patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms] Angiologiya i sosudistaya khirurgiya [Angiology and Vascular Surgery] 2013. P. 5–72. URL: https://www.mrckb.ru/files/recommendations_AAA.pdf (accessed: 10.12.2022) [in Russian]
3. Dyussupov A.A. Profilaktika oslozhnenii khirurgicheskogo lecheniya infrarenal'noi anevrizmy aorty: dis. doktora med. nauk: 14.01.26 [Prevention of complications of surgical treatment of infrarenal aortic aneurysm: dis. Dr. med. Sciences: 14.01.26] – Novosibirsk, 2017. URL: https://www.meshalkin.ru/uploads/disser_DusupovAA_full_text_published_04_04_2017.pdf (accessed: 10.12.2022) [in Russian]
4. Mozgovoy P. V. et al. Rezul'taty endovaskulyar-nogo protezirovaniya u patsientov s anevrizmami infrarenal'noi aorty [Results of endovascular prosthesis in patients with aneurysms of the infrarenal aorta] Vestnik Volgogradskogo gosudarstvennogo meditsinskogo universiteta [Bulletin of the Volgograd State Medical University] 2020. Volume 74, № 2. P. 135–138. URL: https://doi.org/10.19163/1994-9480-2020-2(74)-135-138 (accessed: 10.12.2022) [in Russian]
5. Khubulava G.G., Svetlikov A.V. Nikolai Leont'evich Volodos'. Istoriya neosporimogo mirovogo prioriteta v izobretenii sosudistogo endoproteza [Nikolai Leontyevich Volodos. History of unquestioned world priority in invention of vascular endoprosthesis]. Vestnik khirurgii imeni I.I. Grekova [Bulletin of Surgery] 2017. 176(3):95-98. https://doi.org/10.24884/0042-4625-2017-176-3-95-98 (accessed: 09.12.2022) [in Russian]
Number of Views: 71
Category of articles:
Reviews
Bibliography link
Zemlyanskiy V.V., Zemlyanskaya N.S., Sultanaliev T.А., Dautov T.B., Kozhakhmetov S.K., Openko V.G. Interventional methods for the prevention of complications after endovascular prosthetics of infrarenal aortic aneurysm: literature review // Nauka i Zdravookhranenie [Science & Healthcare]. 2023, (Vol.25) 1, pp. 160-172. doi 10.34689/SH.2023.25.1.020Related publications:
INTERRELATION OF INTRAABDOMINAL HYPERTENSION AND MARKERS OF GASTROINTESTINAL TRACT INJURY IN PATIENTS WITH MULTIORGAN DYSFUNCTION
DRUG-INDUCED LIVER INJURY AND GENDER DIFFERENCES
QUALITY OF LIFE IN PRIMARY BILIARY CHOLANGITIS AND ITS ASSESSMENT
DIAGNOSTIC AND THERAPEUTIC LAPAROSCOPY FOR ABDOMINAL INJURIES. REVIEW
METHODS FOR SCHOOL-AGE CHILDREN NUTRITIONAL STATUS ASSESSMENT: FOCUS ON ANTHROPOMETRIC PARAMETERS. A REVIEW.