Online ISSN: 3007-0244,
Print ISSN:  2410-4280
COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF CHOLECYSTECTOMY TECHNIQUES
Open article in archive

Introduction: The review compares the efficacy and safety of mini-laporatomy, laparoscopy and traditional cholecystectomy. We summarizes results of studies on advantages and disadvantages of various methods of cholecystectomy with considering of after-operational complications, mortality, average residence of patients in hospital and rehabilitation period.

The aim: to summarize and compare modern cholecystectomy techniques.

Materials and methods: Systematic review and subsequent analysis of publication data and online sources were carried outusing PubMed, MEDLINE, books, publications, editions, opinions of national and international scientists.

Results: Nowadays there are three main types of cholecystectomy: laparoscopic, traditional and mini-invasive.

Conclusions: of the reviewed evidence suggests the superiority of mini-laparatomic cholecystectomy
Number of Views: 1564


Category of articles: Reviews

Bibliography link

Раимжанова А. Б. Сравнительная оценка различных способов холецистэктомии / / Наука и Здравоохранение. 2016. №1. С. 40-53.

Raimzhanova A. B. Comparative evaluation of cholecystectomy techniques. Nauka i Zdravookhranenie [Science & Healthcare]. 2016, 1, pp. 40-53.

Раимжанова А. Б. Холецистэктомияның әртүрлі әдістердің салыстырмалы бағалау / / Ғылым және Денсаулық сақтау. 2016. №1. Б. 40-53.


Авторизируйтесь для отправки комментариев