ECONOMIC EFFICIENCY OF IMPLANTATION OF ASSISTED REPRODUCTIVE TECHNOLOGIES IN A SOCIAL CONTEXT
Introduction: Defining the problem of infertility as a primary task for the reproduction of a healthy generation, the state annually allocates a large amount of budget funds to create optimal conditions for its solution, in particular through the introduction of assisted reproductive technologies (ART). Unlike other programs, social benefits from the introduction of ART in comparison with other areas can only be felt in the long term.
Aim: To determine the socio-economic efficiency of the implementation of ART programs in Kazakhstan, funded by the state budget.
Materials and methods: The study was built in two stages: (1) analysis of the current situation on the services to ART in the Republic of Kazakhstan, at the expense of the state budget for the period 2010-2017; with the subsequent (2) calculation of economic efficiency in a prognostic aspect. An integrated model for evaluating the effectiveness was conducted using: 1) economic assessment, which was aimed at determining the amount of project profits from tax and other types of contributions to the state budget; 2) financial assessment to determine the payback period of the project; and 3) budget assessment conducted by determining the excess of the amount of budget revenues from the project over budget expenditures spent on its implementation. The materials of the study were the operational data of the Committee of Statistics of the Ministry of National Economy and the Ministry of Health of the Republic of Kazakhstan for the last 10 years (2007-2017).
Results: On average, the minimum expenses incurred by the state for the birth of one child using ART (the cost of medical procedures and the minimum life requirements of each child born) will be on average up to 17,029,644.35±117,218.31 tenge. For reimbursement of the amount spent by the state per 1 resident of the country born with the use of reproductive technologies, an average of 13.04 ± 0.24 years is required to replenish these expenses to the state treasury.
Conclusion: The birth of new members of the society under the ART program brings great economic benefits from future tax revenues to the state budget, exceeding the cost of the country 57 times.
Sholpan B. Chegedekova 1,
Zaituna A. Khismetova 1
Ken Inoue 2, http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0710-481X
1 NP JSC «Semey medical university», Semey sity, Republic of Kazakhstan
2 Department of Public Health, Graduate School of Medicine, Gunma University, Maebashi city, Japan
1. Амирова А.Ф. Особенности повторной попытки экстракорпорального оплодотворения у пациенток с предыдущей неудачей // Проблемы репродукции. 2010. №16 (4): 44-46;
2. Вспомогательные репродуктивные технологии. Опыт использования ВРТ в США, Европе, Израиле и Украине // Актуально. Междисциплинарные проблемы, 2017, выпуск №8. Интернет-ссылка: http://ozdorovie.com.ua/vspomogatelnyie-reproduktivnyie-tehnologii-opyit-ispolzovaniya-vrt-v-ssha-evrope-izraile-i-ukraine/#acceptLicense (Дата обращения: 24.12. 2018);
3. Герасимов А.Н. Медицинская статистика. Москва: МИА; 2007. 480;
4. Гончарова Н.Н., Мартышкина Е.Ю., Казначеева Т.В., Арсланян К.Н., Адамян Л.В., Курило Л.Ф., Сорокина Т.М., Черных В.Б. Медико-генетические аспекты бесплодия // Акушерство, гинекология и репродукция. 2012. №2: 35-40;
5. Данные Департамента организации медицинской помощи Министерства здравоохранения Республики Казахстан за 2017 год, Астана. 2018. 21 с.;
6. Данные Комитета статистики Министерства национальной экономики Республики Казахстана за 2010-2017 годы. Интернет-ссылка: сайт: http://stat.gov.kz (Дата обращения: 24.12.2018);
7. Европейский портал информации здравоохра-нения Всемирной организации здравоохранения. https://gateway.euro.who.int/ru/hfa-explorer/ (Дата обращения: 24.12.2018);
8. Еркенова С.Е., Аубакир А.Н., Жусупбек М.Б. и др. Современные методы диагностики и лечения бесплодия брака // Вестник КазНМУ. 2017, №4: 3-6;
9. Ибрагимова Э.О. Повышение эффективности программ вспомогательных репродуктивных технологий на основании дифференцированного подхода к выполнению вспомогательного хетчинга: дисс. на соис. уч.степени к.м.н. Москва, 2018, 115 с.;
10. Исупова О. Вспомогательные репродуктивные технологии: новые возможности // Демографическое обозрение. 2017, Т.4, №1: 35-64;
11. Полкова Т.В. Демографический потенциал как составляющая части жизни // Экономика региона. 2014, 3: 118-129;
12. Протопопова Н.В., Дружинина Е.Б., Маслова Д.В. и соавт. Анализ эффективности различных методов оплодотворения в программах ВРТ // Бюллетень ВСНЦ СО РАМН. 2016, Том 1, 3 (109), Часть I: 15-19;
13. Статистический сборник Министерства здравоохранения Республики Казахстан «Здоровье населения Республики Казахстан и деятельность организаций здравоохранения» за 2017 год. Астана, 2018 – 354с.;
14. Турганова М.К., Абдулбаева А.А., Минайдаров А.А. Вспомогательные репродуктивные технологии в Казахстане // Вестник АГИУВ. 2015, 3-4: 44-47.
References:
1. Amirova A.F. Osobennosti povtornoi popytki ekstrakorporal'nogo oplodotvoreniya u patsientok s predydushchei neudachei [Features of repeated in vitro fertilization attempts in patients with previous failure]. Problemy reproduktsii [Reproduction problems]. 2010; №16 (4): 44-46 [in Russian];
2. Vspomogatel'nye reproduktivnye tekhnologii. Opyt ispol'zovaniya VRT v SShA, Evrope, Izraile i Ukraine [Assisted Reproductive Technologies. Experience of using ART in the USA, Europe, Israel and Ukraine]. Aktual'no. Mezhdistsiplinarnye problem [Actual. Interdisciplinary problems], 2017, vypusk №8. Internet-ssylka: http://ozdorovie.com.ua/vspomogatelnyie-reproduktivnyie-tehnologii-opyit-ispolzovaniya-vrt-v-ssha-evrope-izraile-i-ukraine/#acceptLicense (accessed: 24.12.2018) [in Russian];
3. Gerasimov A.N. Meditsinskaya statistika [Medical statistics]. Moskva: MIA; 2007: p. 480; [in Russian];
4. Goncharova N.N., Martyshkina E.Yu., Kaznacheeva T.V., Arslanyan K.N., Adamyan L.V., Kurilo L.F., Sorokina T.M., Chernykh V.B. Mediko-geneticheskie aspekty besplodiya [Medical genetic aspects of infertility]. Akusherstvo, ginekologiya i reproduktsiya [Obstetrics, gynecology and reproduction]. 2012; №2: pp. 35-40 [in Russian];
5. Dannye Departamenta organizatsii meditsinskoi pomoshchi Ministerstva zdravookhraneniya Respubliki Kazakhstan za 2017 god [Data of the Department of the organization of medical care of the Ministry of Health of the Republic of Kazakhstan for 2017], Astsna. 2018. 21 p. [in Russian];
6. Dannye Komiteta statistiki Ministerstva natsional'noi ekonomiki Respubliki Kazakhstana za 2010-2017 gody [Data of the Statistics Committee of the Ministry of National Economy of the Republic of Kazakhstan for 2010-2017]. Internet-ssylka: sait: http://stat.gov.kz (accessed: 24.12.2018) [in Russian];
7. Evropeiskii portal informatsii zdravookhraneniya Vsemirnoi organizatsii zdravookhraneniya [European health information portal of the World Health Organization]. Internet-ssylka: https://gateway.euro.who.int/ru/hfa-explorer/ (accessed: 24.12. 2018) [in Russian];
8. Erkenova S.E., Aubakir A.N., Zhusupbek M.B. i dr. Sovremennye metody diagnostiki i lecheniya besplodiya braka [Modern methods of diagnosis and treatment of marriage infertility]. Vestnik KazNMU [Vestnik of KNМU]. 2017, №4: 3-6 [in Russian];
9. Ibragimova E.O. Povyshenie effektivnosti programm vspomogatel'nykh reproduktivnykh tekhnologii na osnovanii differentsirovannogo podkhoda k vypolneniyu vspomogatel'nogo khetchinga [Improving the efficiency of assisted reproductive technology programs based on a differentiated approach to the implementation of assistive hetching]: diss. na sois. uch.stepeni k.m.n. Moskva, 2018, 115 p. [in Russian];
10. Isupova O. Vspomogatel'nye reproduktivnye tekhnologii: novye vozmozhnosti [Assisted Reproductive Technologies: New Opportunities]. Demograficheskoe obozrenie [Demographic Review]. 2017, tom 4, №1: 35-64 [in Russian];
11. Polkova T.V. Demograficheskii potentsial kak sostavlyayushchaya chasti zhizni [Demographic potential as an integral part of life]. Ekonomika regiona [Economy of the region]. 2014, 3: 118-129 [in Russian];
12. Protopopova N.V., Druzhinina E.B., Maslova D.V. i soavt. Analiz effektivnosti razlichnykh metodov oplodotvoreniya v programmakh VRT [Analysis of the effectiveness of various methods of fertilization in ART programs]. Byulleten' VSNTs SO RAMN [Bulletin of the SSC of the RAMS]. 2016, Tom 1, 3 (109), Chast' I: 15-19 [in Russian];
13. Statisticheskii sbornik Ministerstva zdravookhraneniya Respubliki Kazakhstan «Zdorov'e naseleniya Respubliki Kazakhstan i deyatel'nost' organizatsii zdravookhraneniya» za 2017 god [Statistical compilation of the Ministry of Health of the Republic of Kazakhstan “Health of the population of the Republic of Kazakhstan and the activities of health organizations” for 2017]. Astana, 2018 – 354p. [in Russian];
14. Turganova M.K., Abdulbaeva A.A., Minaidarov A.A. Vspomogatel'nye reproduktivnye tekhnologii v Kazakhstane [Assisted Reproductive Technologies in Kazakhstan]. Vestnik AGIUV [Vestnik of ASIAMS]. 2015, 3-4: 44-47 [in Russian].
Number of Views: 279
Category of articles:
Original articles
Bibliography link
Чегедекова Ш.Б., Хисметова З.А., Кен Иноуе Экономическая эффективность от внедрения вспомогательных репродуктивных технологий в социальном контексте // Наука и Здравоохранение. 2019. 2 (Т.21).С. 108-115. Chegedekova Sh.B., Khismetova Z.A., Ken Inoue Economic efficiency of implantation of assisted reproductive technologies in a social context // Nauka i Zdravookhranenie [Science & Healthcare]. 2019, (Vol.21) 2, pp. 108-115. Чегедекова Ш.Б., Хисметова З.А., Кен Иноуе Әлеуметтік контексте қосалқы репродуктивтік технологияларды енгізуден экономикалық тиімділік // Ғылым және Денсаулық сақтау. 2019. 2 (Т.21). Б. 108-115.Related publications:
ANALYSIS OF CLINICAL AND DEMOGRAPHIC INDICATORS OF PATIENTS WITH PARKINSON'S DISEASE IN THE SOUTHERN REGION OF KAZAKHSTAN
A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF DRUG POLICY REGARDING ORPHAN DISEASES IN THE USA, THE EUROPEAN UNION, AND THE REPUBLIC OF KAZAKHSTAN
MUTATIONS IN CARDIAC ION CHANNEL GENES IN KAZAKHSTANI PATIENTS WITH LONG QT SYNDROME
GENETIC FEATURES OF CONGENITAL DYSFUNCTION OF THE ADRENAL CORTEX CAUSED BY 21-HYDROXYLASE DEFICIENCY IN PERSONS OF KAZAKH NATIONALITY
NON-MOTOR SYMPTOMS IN PARKINSON'S DISEASE USING THE EXAMPLE OF AKTOBE PATIENTS