USE OF ROBSON CLASSIFICATION FOR ANALYSIS THE WORK OF MUNICIPAL STATE ENTERPRISE ON THE RIGHT OF ECONOMIC MANAGEMENT "PAVLODAR REGIONAL PERINATAL CENTER №1" AND FINDING WAYS TO REDUCE THE FREQUENCY OF SURGICAL INTERVENTION
Introduction. Caesarean section (CS) is the most common operation in the world, the rate of which, according to WHO, has reached a maximum in the last decade and amounted to 25-30% in economically developed countries [14]. In many countries, there is growing concern among obstetrician-gynecologists about the increasing frequency of long-term complications after one or more CS operations, such as placenta ingrowth, placental retention in the uterus after childbirth, and uterine rupture with possible subsequent hysterectomy [22].
The aim. Retrospective analysis of work of Municipal state enterprise on the right of economic management "Pavlodar regional perinatal center №1" in 2018 by using Robson classification in order to find ways to reduce the frequency of CS in the hospital of 3rd level.
Materials and methods: Study design - retrospective study. Аnalysis of childbirth histories of patients of Municipal state enterprise on the right of economic management "Pavlodar regional perinatal center №1" in 2018 by using of Robson classification and analysis of indications for operative delivery in accordance with the Robson classification.
The total number of analyzed birth histories in 2018 year was equal to 4101, from which caesarean section deliveries were 1106 (26.97%). The formation of a database of research and calculation of statistical indicators has been produced with the help of a licensed program SPSS 20.0 (IBM Ireland Product Distribution Limited, Ireland). For the statistical results using Student's t-test.
Results. In Municipal state enterprise on the right of economic management "Pavlodar regional perinatal center №1" for 2018, the increase in the frequency of CS with respect to the total number of operative births occurs mainly due to 3 groups: multiparous with a scar on the uterus - 498 (45.03%) № 5; women with gestational age ≤ 36 weeks -140 (12.66%) №10; primiparous, elective CS or induced labor- 93 (8.41%) №2.
The smallest number of abdominal delivery in relation to the total number of operative delivery is presented in the following 3 groups: women with a single pregnancy with a transverse or oblique position of the fetus, including women with a scar on the uterus -15 (1.36%) №9; primiparous with singleton pregnancies in pelvic presentation of the fetus -50 (4.52%) №6; multiparous, without a scar on the uterus with a gestational period ≥ 37 weeks, singleton pregnancy, head presentation of the fetus, induced labor or elective CS -51 (4.61%) №4.
It should be noted that among the 10 groups represented by Robson, the largest number was in the category of multiparous women with a scar on the uterus- 498 (45.03%) №5, and the smallest in the group of women with a single pregnancy , including women with a scar on the uterus -15 (1.36%) №9.
Conclusion. The share of the caesarean section in the total structure of delivery methods in Municipal state enterprise on the right of economic management "Pavlodar regional perinatal center №1" for 2018 was 1106 (26.97%), wherein the most dynamic over a given period of time was multiparous group with scar on the uterus - 498 (45.03%) №5.
In this regard, in our opinion, to prevent the growth of the share of abdominal delivery or to reduce it in the hospital of 3rd level a change is required in the management of pregnant women and parturients. Reducing the frequency of CS in group 5 is a reserve for restraining the growth of abdominal delivery, because over time the number of women with a scar on the uterus will increase. In order to reduce the number of births by the operation of the CS in this group, efforts should be directed to increase the frequency of delivery through the birth canal in women with a scar on the uterus.
The Robson classification can facilitate the analysis of the distribution of women into groups and subgroups, thereby revealing the dynamics of changes in the field of application of caesarean section and the features of the clinical characteristics of pregnant women.
Dilyara Ye. Serikbolova 1,
Alma S. Kaipova 1,
Zhansulu E. Akylzhanova 2, https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6855-127X
Tatiana M. Dernova 1, https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7609-1568
Oksana I. Shalbaeva 1, https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9646-1981
1 Third-year residents by specialty "Obstetrics and gynecology, including children".
Pavlodar branch of NCJSC «Semey Medical University».
2 Head of the course of obstetrics and gynecology.
Pavlodar branch of NCJSC «Semey Medical University».
Pavlodar c., Republic of Kazakhstan
1. Akram H., Bukhari A.A., Din A.U. Multiple caesarean sections - an association with increasing frequency of placenta praevia // Biomedica. 2009 Vol. 25. P. 28–31.
2. Allen V.M., Baskett T.F., O’Connell C.M. Contribution of sel ect maternal groups to temporal trends in rates of caesarean section // JOGC. 2010. Vol. 32, N 7. P. 633–641.
3. Althabe F. [et al.] Cesarean section rates and maternal and neonatal mortality in low-, medium-, and high-income countries: an ecological study // Birth. 2006. Vol. 33. Р. 270–277.
4. Ananth C.V., Vintzileos A.M. Trends in cesarean delivery for pregnancy and association with perinatal mortality // Am.J.Obstet.Gynecol. 2011. Vol. 204, N 6. P. 505–513.
5. Application of the Robson classification of cesarean sections in focus: Robson groups / Budhwa T. [et al.]. A report by the child health network for the greater Toronto area. - Toronto, 2010. 60 р.
6. Bergholt T., Lim L.K., Jorgensen J.S. Maternal body mass index in the first trimester and risk of cesarean delivery in nulliparous women in spontaneous labor // Am.J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2007. Vol. 196, N 2. Р. 163–167.
7. Boatin A.A., Cullinane F., Torloni M.R., Betr A.P. Audit and feedback using the Robson classification to reduce caesarean section rates: a syste matic review. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard. BJOG. 2018; 125: 36-42.
8. Brennan D.J., Robson M.C., Murphy M. Comparative analysis of international cesarean delivery rates for the 10-group classification identifies significant differences in spontaneous labor // Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2009. Vol. 201, N 3. P. 308–316.
9. Cheng Y., Nakagawa S., Caughey A. Number of prior cesarean delivery and perinatal outcomes: more is worse? // Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2009. Vol. 200, suppl. P. 214.
10. Christilaw J.E. Cesarean section by choice: Constructing a reproductive rights framework for the debate // International J. Gynecol. Obstet. 2006. Vol. 94. P. 262–268.
11. Clark E.A. S., Silver R.M. Long-term maternal morbidity associated with repeat cesarean delivery // Am.J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2011. Vol. 205, N 6, suppl. P. S2–10.
12. Daltveit A.K., Tollanes M.C., Pihlstrom H. Cesarean delivery and subsequent pregnancies // Obstet. Gynecol. 2008. Vol. 111, N 6. P. 1327–1334.
13. Denk C.E., Krusе L.K., Jain N.J. Surveillance of cesarean section deliveries, New Jersey 1999–2004 // Perinatal Care. 2006. Vol. 33, N 3. Р. 203–209.
14. Dobrokhotova Yu.E., Kuznetsov P.A., Kopylova Yu.V., Dzhokhadze L.S. Caesarean section: past and future // Gynecology]. 2015. T.17. №.3. pp. 64-67. [in Russian]
15. Dunne C., Silva O.D., Schmidt G. Outcomes of elective labour induction and elective caesarean section in low-risk pregnancies between 37 and 41 weeks' gestation // JOGC. 2009. Vol. 31, N 12. Р. 1124–1130.
16. Ecker J.L., Frigoletto F.D. Cesarean delivery and the risk– benefit calculus // N. Engl. J. Med. 2007. Vol. 356, N 9. P. 885–889.
17. Farine D. Classification of caesarean sections in Canada: the modified Robson criteria // JOGC. 2012. Vol. 34, N 10. Р. 976–979.
18. Giguere R. Social determinants of cesarean deliveries in Latin America: a case study of Brazil // Center for Global Initiatives. 2007, April. 47 р.
19. Hamilton B.E., Martin J.A., Ventura S.J. Births: preliminary data for 2006 // National vital statistics reports. 2007. Vol. 56, N 7. Р. 54-63.
20. https://www.who.int/mediacentre/news/releases/2015/caesarean-sections/ru/
21. Nakamura Pereira M., do Carmo Leal M., Esteves Pereira A.P., Soares Madeira Domingues R.M., Alves Torres J, Bastos Dias M.A., Moreira M.E. Use of Robson classification to assess cesarean section rate in Brazil: the role of source of payment for childbirth. Reproductive Health. 2016; 13(Suppl 3): 128.
22. Orlova V.S., Kalashnikova I.V., Bulgakova E.V i dr. Abdominal delivery as a medical and social problem of modern obstetrics // Obstetrics and women's diseases]. 2013. №4. pp. 6-14. [in Russian]
23. Pang S.M.W. et al. Determinants of preference for elective caesarean section in Hong Kong Chinese pregnant women // Hong Kong Med. Journal 2007. Vol.13, N2. P. 100–105.
24. Robson M. Classification of caesarean sections. Fetal Matern Med. Rev. 2001; 12: 23 39.
25. Shah A. et al. Cesarean delivery outcomes fr om the WHO global survey on maternal and perinatal health in Africa // Int.Journal Gynecol. Obstet. 2009. Vol. 107. P. 191–197.
26. Souter V., Jodie K., Chien A. The Robson Classification: Monitoring and Comparing Cesarean Delivery Rates. Obstetrics & Gynecology. 2016; 127: 131s.
27. Statisticheskij sbornik MZ RK: «Zdorov'e naselenija Respubliki Kazahstan i dejatel'nost' organizacij zdravoohranenija» – Astana: TOO «Medinform», 2017.
28. Stavrou E.P. [et al.] Epidemiology and trends for caesarean section births in New South Wales, Australia: A population-based study // BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 2011. Vol. 11. Р. 8.
29. Trueba G. [et al.] Alternative strategy to decrease cesarean section: support by doulas during labor // J. Perinatal Education. 2000. Vol. 9, N 2. P. 89–13.
30. Villar J. [et al.] Caesarean delivery rates and pregnancy outcomes: the 2005 WHO global survey on maternal and perinatal health in Latin America // Lancet. 2006. Vol. 367. Р. 1819–1829.
31. Wood S., Cooper S., Rossa S. Does induction of labour increase the risk of caesarean section? A systematic review and meta analysis of trials in women with intact membranes. BJOG. 2014; 121: 674 685.
32. Zhang J. [et al.] Contemporary cesarean delivery practice in the United States // Am. J. Obst. Gynecol. October 2010. Vol. 203, N 4. P. 326–336.
Number of Views: 289
Category of articles:
Original articles
Bibliography link
Serikbolova D.Ye., Kaipova A.S., Akylzhanova Zh.E., Dernova T.M., Shalbayeva O.I. Use of Robson classification for analysis the work of Municipal state enterprise on the right of economic management "Pavlodar regional perinatal center №1" and finding ways to reduce the frequency of surgical intervention // Nauka i Zdravookhranenie [Science & Healthcare]. 2019, (Vol.21) 3, pp. 135-141.Related publications:
ANALYSIS OF CLINICAL AND DEMOGRAPHIC INDICATORS OF PATIENTS WITH PARKINSON'S DISEASE IN THE SOUTHERN REGION OF KAZAKHSTAN
A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF DRUG POLICY REGARDING ORPHAN DISEASES IN THE USA, THE EUROPEAN UNION, AND THE REPUBLIC OF KAZAKHSTAN
MUTATIONS IN CARDIAC ION CHANNEL GENES IN KAZAKHSTANI PATIENTS WITH LONG QT SYNDROME
GENETIC FEATURES OF CONGENITAL DYSFUNCTION OF THE ADRENAL CORTEX CAUSED BY 21-HYDROXYLASE DEFICIENCY IN PERSONS OF KAZAKH NATIONALITY
NON-MOTOR SYMPTOMS IN PARKINSON'S DISEASE USING THE EXAMPLE OF AKTOBE PATIENTS