EVALUATION OF THE QUALITY OF LIFE IN PATIENTS AFTER AUTOPLASTY OF THE INGUINAL CANAL WITH A DISPLACED APONEUROTIC FLAP
Background. The patient's quality of life plays a significant role in evaluating the effectiveness of hernia repair and is no less important than the frequency of relapse, and it has also become an important indicator of evaluating the results after surgery. To assess and measure the results of quality of life for patients after hernioplasty, specialized questionnaires are required.
Aim. To assess the quality of life after autoplasty of the posterior wall of the inguinal canal with a displaced aponeurotic flap using a questionnaire developed by us "Questionnaire for assessing the quality of life of a patient after hernioplasty".
Materials and methods. The total number of subjects is 30 people. A new method of autoplasty was used in 15 patients in the study group, the comparison group -Lichtenstein hernioplasty using a partially absorbable mesh (UltraPro) - 15 patients. The patient's quality of life was assessed based on the survey data. The group arithmetic mean (????) and standard deviation (SD) were calculated for all quantitative data. The significance of differences between the study groups was determined by statistical methods using nonparametric criteria: the Mann-Whitney criterion for comparing independent groups ("experience-control").
Results. Based on the results of the survey, it was noted that in the early stages after surgery, the quality of life is best in the group with the use of a mesh. Symptomatically disturbing pain was higher in patients who underwent autoplasty in the 1st month after surgery. However, in later periods, the quality of life in the main group improves with a statistically significant difference of p>0.05. All symptomatic sensations and complaints in both groups (with the exception of pain in the comparison group, statistically significant differences >0.05) decreased by 6 months after hernioplasty.
Conclusion. This study can prove to be an important tool for comparing results between groups of patients after hernia surgery and can be applied in our country.
Saule T. Sapieyva1,
Nurkassi T. Abatov1, https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4111-6355
Scopus Author ID: 57041293300
Makash T. Aliyakparov1,
Ruslan M. Badyrov1, https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3578-7144
Elena S. Badyrova1,
1 NCJSC «Karaganda Medical University»,
Karaganda city, Republic of Kazakhstan
1. Abd Al-Fatah M., Al-Sheemy G., Abd Al-Aal A. et al. Desarda Inguinal Herniorrhaphy // Journal of American Science 2016;12(1)
2. Alfieri S., Amid P.K., Campanelli G., Izard G., Kehlet H., Wijsmuller A.R., et al. International guidelines for prevention and management of post-operative chronic pain following inguinal hernia surgery // Hernia 2011; 15:239–249.
3. Andresen K., Burcharth J., Rosenberg J. et al. The initial experience of introducing the Onstep technique for inguinal hernia repair in a general surgical department // Scand J Surg. 2015; 104:61–65.
4. Bay-Nielsen M., Perkins F.M., Kehlet H. et al. For the Danish Hernia Database. Pain and functional impairment 1 year after inguinal herniorrhaphy: a nationwide questionnaire study // Ann Surg. 2001; 233(1):1.
5. Belyansky I., Tsirline V.B., Klima D.A., Walters A.L., Lincourt A.E., Heniford T.B. Prospective, comparative study of postoperative quality of life in TEP, TAPP, and modified Lichtenstein repairs // Ann Surg 2011; 254:709-14.
6. Callesen T., Bech K., Kehlet H. Prospective study of chronic pain after groin hernia repair // Br J Surg 1999; 86:1528–1531.
7. Christoffersen M.W., Rosenberg J., Jorgensen L.N. et al. Health-related quality of life scores changes significantly within the first three months after herniа mesh repair // World J Surg. 2014; 38:1852–18509.
8. Gitelis M.E., Patel L., Deasis F., et al. Laparoscopic totally extraperitnoeal groin hernia repair and quality of life at 2-year follow up. J Am Coll Surg. 2016; 223:153–161.
9. Colavita P.D., Tsirline V.B., Belyansky I. et al. Prospective, long-term comparison of quality of life in laparoscopic versus open ventral hernia repair // Ann Surg. 2012; 256:714–722.
10. Cunningham J., Temple W.J., Mitchell P., Nixon J.A., Preshaw R.M., Hagen N.A. Cooperative hernia study. Pain in the post-repair patient // Ann Surg 1996; 224:598-602.
11. Dabbas N., Adams K., Pearson K., Royle G. Frequency of abdominal wall hernias: is classical teaching out of date? // JRSM Short Rep. 2011;2(1):5.
12. Fortelny R.H., Petter-Puchner A.H., Redl H. et all. Assessment of Pain and Quality of Life in Lichtenstein Hernia Repair Using a New Monofilament PTFE Mesh: Comparison of Suture vs. Fibrin-Sealant Mesh Fixation // Front Surg. 2014; 1: 45.
13. Franneby U., Sandblom G., Nordin P. et al. Risk factors for longterm pain after hernia surgery // Ann Surg 2006; 244:212–219.
14. Heniford B.T., Amanda L.W., Lincourt A.E. Comparison of generic versus specific quality-of-life scales for mesh hernia repairs // J Am Coll Surg. 2008; 206(4):638-44.
15. Heniford B.T., Lincourt A.E., Walters A.L. Carolinas Comfort Scale as a Measure of Hernia Repair Quality of Life // Annals of Surgery. 2018. 267(1), 171–176.
16. Heniford B.T., Walters A.L., Lincourt A.E., Novitsky Y.W., Hope W.W., Kercher K.W. Comparison of generic versus specific quality-of-life scales for mesh hernia repairs // J. Am. Coll. Surg. 2008; 206: 638–44.
17. Jenkins J.T., O’Dwyer P.J. Inguinal hernias // BMJ. 2008. Feb 2; 336 (7638): 269–272.
18. Kehlet H., Bay-Nielsen M., Kingsnorth A. Chronic postherniorrhaphy pain – a call for uniform assessment // Hernia. 2002;6:178–181.].
19. Li J., Ji Z., Cheng T. Lightweight versus heavyweight in inguinal hernia repair: a meta-analysis. Hernia. 2012. 16(5):529–539
20. Loos M.J., Houterman S., Scheltinga M.R., Roumen R.M. Evaluating postherniorrhaphy groin pain: Visual Analogue or Verbal Rating Scale? // Hernia. 2008;12:147-51.
21. Luijendijk R.W., Hop W.C., van den Tol M.P. et al. A comparison of suture repair with mesh repair for incisional hernia // N Engl J Med. 2000; 343: 392–398.
22. Merskey H. Classification of chronic pain. Descriptions of chronic pain syndromes and definitions of pain terms. Prepared by the International Association for the Study of Pain, Subcommittee on Taxonomy // Pain. Suppl 1986;3:S1– S226
23. Nielsen K., Poelman M.M., den Bakker F.M. Comparison of the Dutch and English versions of the Carolinas Comfort Scale: a specific quality-of-life questionnaire for abdominal hernia repairs with mesh // Hernia. 2014 Aug; 18(4) : 459-64. doi: 10.1007/s10029-013-1173-9. Epub 2013 Oct 29.
24. Nienhuijs S., Staal E., Strobbe L., Rosman C., Groenewoud H., Bleichrodt R. Chronic pain after mesh repair of inguinal hernia: a systematic review // Am J Surg. 2007;194:394–400.
25. Oprea V., Grad O., Gheorghescu D. et al. TransinguinalPreperitoneal Mesh Plasty – An Alternative or a Dispensable Technique? A Prospective Analyze vs Lichtenstein Repair for Complex Unilateral Groin Hernias // Chirurgia, 114 (1), 2019.
26. Page B., Paterson C., Young D. et al. Pain from primary inguinal hernia and the effect of repair on pain // Br J Surg. 2002; 89:1315– 1318.
27. Poobalan A.S., Bruce J., King P.M. et al. Chronic pain and quality of life following open inguinal hernia repair // Br J Surg. 2001; 88:1122–1126.
28. Yang Y., Chengyuan W. Guidelines on the basic outcome data from International Association for the Study of Pain // Clin J Pain. 2007; 23 : 549.
29. Yang S., Shen Y.M., Wang M.G. et all. Titanium-coated mesh versusstandard polypropylene mesh inlaparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: aprospective, randomized, controlled clinical trial // Hernia. 2019; 23(2):255-259.
30. ZhangH., Jinhui Li, Maosong Gonget all. CTEP Versus LESS Totally ExtraperitonealHernioplasty // JSLS. 2018; 22(4): e2018.00040.
Number of Views: 207
Category of articles:
Original articles
Bibliography link
Sapieyva S.T., Abatov N.T., Aliyakparov M.T., Badyrov R.M., Badyrova E.S. Evaluation of the quality of life in patients after autoplasty of the inguinal canal with a displaced aponeurotic flap // Nauka i Zdravookhranenie [Science & Healthcare]. 2020, (Vol.22) 5, pp. 92-99. doi 10.34689/SH.2020.22.5.009.Related publications:
ANALYSIS OF CLINICAL AND DEMOGRAPHIC INDICATORS OF PATIENTS WITH PARKINSON'S DISEASE IN THE SOUTHERN REGION OF KAZAKHSTAN
A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF DRUG POLICY REGARDING ORPHAN DISEASES IN THE USA, THE EUROPEAN UNION, AND THE REPUBLIC OF KAZAKHSTAN
MUTATIONS IN CARDIAC ION CHANNEL GENES IN KAZAKHSTANI PATIENTS WITH LONG QT SYNDROME
GENETIC FEATURES OF CONGENITAL DYSFUNCTION OF THE ADRENAL CORTEX CAUSED BY 21-HYDROXYLASE DEFICIENCY IN PERSONS OF KAZAKH NATIONALITY
NON-MOTOR SYMPTOMS IN PARKINSON'S DISEASE USING THE EXAMPLE OF AKTOBE PATIENTS