INTERPROFESSIONAL COLLABORATION IN PUBLIC HEALTH HIGH EDUCATION AND PERSPECTIVE OF FUTURE SPECIALISTS
Introduction. Universal health coverage shows the main direction in the development of the healthcare system. Prevention of the population health depends on implementation of the public health programs. Market changes in scientific and educational services impose new requirements on the activities of universities. Growing competition, rapid growth in the number of universities, a decrease in the number of potential applicants, rapidly changing factors in the external and internal environment of the university, changes in the behavior of consumers of educational services, systematic updating of education and professional development require universities to create a continuous system of training and retraining of specialists who know various terms. Thus, the new scientific research direction needs to be part of the public health educational program, such as artificial intelligence etc. In this regard the role of the collaboration between other sectors like IT, law etc. is important to create a competitive public health program.
The purpose is to study the world experience of interdisciplinary programs related to public health and their competitiveness.
Methods: The information base of the research was made up of scientific publications published in foreign peer-reviewed journals, as well as data from international organizations and statistical bodies. Literature search was conducted in PubMed, Scopus databases for the period from 2008 to 2023.
Results. Fourteen relevant studies focusing on interdisciplinary programs related to public health and their competitiveness was included for analysis. The concept-mapping process identified domains as innovation, intervention, joint public health program, partnerships, communications, and strategic planning which have influence for competitive market in higher education. Public health programs can be jointly implemented with other sectors as law, social science, nursing, medicine and etc.
Conclusion. Today, modern educational management tools are very diverse and comprehensive. However, with all the variety of methods, the university is a little-studied organization from the point of view of practical management: the direction of university management is just being formed. The development of two-degree programs in public health will increase the number of students in various fields (law, social service, information technology, etc.), thereby increasing its competitiveness.
Maksut T. Senbekov1, https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3954-1317
1 Asfendiyarov Kazakh National Medical University,
Almaty, Republic of Kazakhstan.
1. Alberts B. Prioritizing science education. Science. 2010 Apr 23. 328(5977):405. doi: 10.1126/science.1190788.
2. Abu-Zaid A., Eshaq A.M., Alkattan K. Dual-degree MBBS-MPH programs in Saudi Arabia: A call for implementation // J Family Med Prim Care. 2019. 8(2). P. 352-355. doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_461_18.
3. Ackerly D.C., Sangvai D.G., Udayakumar K., Shah B.R., Kalman N.S., Cho A.H., Schulman K.A., Fulkerson W.J., Dzau V.J. Training the next generation of physician-executives: an innovative residency pathway in management and leadership // Acad Med. 2011. 86(5). P. 575-579. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e318212e51b.
4. Ammerman A., Smith T.W., Calancie L. Practice-based evidence in public health: improving reach, relevance, and results // Annu Rev Public Health. 2014. 35. P.47-63. doi: 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-032013-182458.
5. Baker S., Daginawala N. Leadership training for radiologists: a survey of opportunities and participants in MBA and MPH programs by medical students, residents, and current chairpersons // J Am Coll Radiol. 2011. 8(8). P. 563-567. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2011.02.013.
6. Barss P., Grivna M., Al-Maskari F., Kershaw G. Strengthening public health medicine training for medical students: development and evaluation of a lifestyle curriculum // Med Teach. 2008. 30(9-10). P.196-218. doi: 10.1080/01421590802334267.
7. Bloom N. et al. The impact of competition on management quality: evidence from public hospitals // The Review of Economic Studies. 2015. 2(82). P. 457-489.
8. Boumil M.M. Commentary: collaboration in dual degree programs contributes something new to both fields // J Public Health Policy. 2014. 35(2). P. 239-245. doi: 10.1057/jphp.2014.1.
9. Brazeau G.A. Interprofessional education: more is needed // Am J Pharm Educ. 2013. 77(9). P. 184. doi: 10.5688/ajpe779184.
10. Breton E. A Sophisticated Architecture Is Indeed Necessary for the Implementation of Health in All Policies but not Enough Comment on "Understanding the Role of Public Administration in Implementing Action on the Social Determinants of Health and Health Inequities" // Int J Health Policy Manag. 2016. 5(6). P. 383-385. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2016.28. PMID: 27285517; PMCID: PMC4885730.
11. Buring S.M., Bhushan A., Brazeau G., Conway S., Hansen L., Westberg S. Keys to successful implementation of interprofessional education: learning location, faculty development, and curricular themes // Am J Pharm Educ. 2009. 73(4). P. 60. doi: 10.5688/aj730460. PMID: 19657493; PMCID: PMC2720356.
12. Campbell N., Wozniak H., Philip R.L., Damarell R.A. Peer-supported faculty development and workplace teaching: an integrative review // Med Educ. 2019. 53(10). P. 978-988. doi: 10.1111/medu.13896.
13. Caron R.M., Tutko H. MPH program adaptability in a competitive marketplace: the case for continued assessment // J Community Health. 2010. 35(3). P. 275-284. doi: 10.1007/s10900-010-9225-x.
14. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention // A sustainable planning guide for healthy communities. http://www.cdc.gov/healthycommunitiesprogram/pdf/sustainability_guide.pdf. (accessed 22.05.2023).
15. Chichirez C.M., Purcărea V.L. Health marketing and behavioral change: a review of the literature // J Med Life. 2018. 11(1). P. 15-19
16. Clark P.G. The devil is in the details: the seven deadly sins of organizing and continuing interprofessional education in the US // J Interprof Care. 2011. 25(5). P. 321-7. doi: 10.3109/13561820.2011.578223.
17. Coculescu B.I., Coculescu E.C., Radu A., Petrescu L., Purcărea V.L. Market policy as an innovative element of marketing in the Romanian healthcare services - an approach focused on the patient // J Med Life. 2015. 8(4). P. 440-443.
18. Cooper S.P., McCormick J.B., Chappell C.L., Clare N., Vela L., et al. Texas needs physicians trained in public health: a new 4-year integrated MD/MPH degree program // Tex Med. 2010. 106(4). e1
19. DeSalvo K.B., O'Carroll P.W., Koo D., Auerbach J.M., Monroe J.A. Public Health 3.0: Time for an Upgrade // Am J Public Health. 2016. 106(4). P. 621-622. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2016.303063.
20. Engbers R., de Caluwé L.I.A., Stuyt P.M.J., Fluit C.R.M.G., Bolhuis S. Towards organizational development for sustainable high-quality medical teaching // Perspect Med Educ. 2013. 2(1). P. 28-40. doi: 10.1007/s40037-013-0043-6.
21. Frankel R.M., Eddins-Folensbee F., Inui T.S. Crossing the patient-centered divide: transforming health care quality through enhanced faculty development // Acad Med. 2011. 86(4). P. 445-52. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e31820e7e6e.
22. Frieden T.R. Six components necessary for effective public health program implementation // Am J Public Health. 2014. 104(1). P 17-22. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2013.301608.
23. Giansanti D. Artificial Intelligence in Public Health: Current Trends and Future Possibilities // Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022. 19(19). doi: 10.3390/ijerph191911907.
24. Hall L.W., Zierler B.K. Interprofessional Education and Practice Guide No. 1: developing faculty to effectively facilitate interprofessional education // J Interprof Care. 2015. 29(1). P. 3-7. doi: 10.3109/13561820.2014.937483.
25. Harmon K.G., Drezner J.A., Gammons M., et al. American Medical Society for Sports Medicine position statement: concussion in sport // Br J Sports Med. 2013. 47(1). 15-26. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2012-091941.
26. Ho K., Jarvis-Selinger S., Borduas F., Frank B., Hall P., Handfield-Jones R., Hardwick D.F. et al. Making interprofessional education work: the strategic roles of the academy // Acad Med. 2008. 83(10) .P. 934-940. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181850a75.
27. Hoffman J.L., Cowdery J.E. Interprofessional Collaboration in Public Health // Nurs Educ Perspect. 2021. 42(1). P. 46-48. doi: 10.1097/01.NEP.0000000000000591.
28. Jaksic-Stojanovic A., Jankovic M. Management and Marketing in Health Institutions // Stud Health Technol Inform. 2020. 25. 274:299-107. doi: 10.3233/SHTI200669.
29. Janssen M.M., Mathijssen J.J., van Bon-Martens M.J., van Oers H.A., Garretsen H.F. Effectiveness of alcohol prevention interventions based on the principles of social marketing: a systematic review // Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy. 2013. 8(18). doi: 10.1186/1747-597X-8-18.
30. Jorm C., Roberts C., Lim R., et al. A large-scale mass casualty simulation to develop the non-technical skills medical students require for collaborative teamwork // BMC Med Educ. 2016. 16(83). doi:10.1186/s12909-016-0588-2.
31. Kaplan R.M., Satterfield J.M., Kington R.S. Building a better physician--the case for the new MCAT // N Engl J Med. 2012. 366(14). P. 1265-1268. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1113274.
32. Kaufman N., Allan S., Ibrahim J. Using public health legal counsel effectively: beliefs, barriers and opportunities for training // J Law Med Ethics. 2013. 1. P. 61-64. doi: 10.1111/jlme.12041.
33. Kehyan M.G. Impact of external and internal environmental factors on innovative development of educational institutions // Voprosy innovative economy. 2015. 5(4). P. 189-206. doi: 10.18334/inec.5.4.2103
34. Lamparyk K., Williams A.M., Robiner W.N., Bruschwein H.M., Ward W.L. Interprofessional Education: Current State in Psychology Training // J Clin Psychol Med Settings. 2022. 29(1). P. 20-30. doi: 10.1007/s10880-021-09765-5.
35. Linnan L.A., Steckler A., Maman S., Ellenson M., French E., Blanchard L., Bowling M., Yamanis N., Succop S., Davenport A., Moracco B. Engaging key stakeholders to assess and improve the professional preparation of MPH health educators // Am J Public Health. 2010. 100(10). P. 1993-1999. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2009.177709.
36. Luca N.R., Suggs L.S. Theory and model use in social marketing health interventions // J Health Commun. 2013. 18(1). P. 20-40. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2012.688243.
37. MacIntyre C.R., Chen X., Kunasekaran M., Quigley A., et al. Artificial intelligence in public health: the potential of epidemic early warning systems // J Int Med Res. 2023.51(3). doi: 10.1177/03000605231159335.
38. Marks J.H. What’s the big deal? The ethics of public-private partnerships related to food and health. (May 23, 2013). Edmond J. Safra Working Paper No. 11. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2268079 . (accessed 22.05.2023).
39. Meyer E. Bringing population health into medical education: Q&A with Mark Schwartz of NYU School of Medicine. 2017. https://iaphs.org/bringing-population-health-medical-education-qa-mark-schwartz-ny (accessed 22.05.2023)
40. Morozov A.V. Features of higher education management in modern conditions. Management education: theory and practice. 2016. Т.2 (22) P. 90-106
41. Negandhi H., Negandhi P., Tiwari R., Sharma A., Zodpey S., Kulatilaka H., Tikyani S. Developing core competencies for monitoring and evaluation tracks in South Asian MPH programs // BMC Med Educ. 2015. 15(126). doi: 10.1186/s12909-015-0403-5.
42. Nevin C.R. et al. Gamification as a tool for enhancing graduate medical education // Postgraduate medical journal. 2014. 1070. P. 685-693.
43. Orlando R., Haytaian M. Physician leadership: a health-care system's investment in the future of quality care // Conn Med. 2012. 76(7). P. 417-420.
44. O'Sullivan P.S., Irby D.M. Reframing research on faculty development // Acad Med. 2011. 86(4). P. 421-438. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e31820dc058.
45. Interprofessional Education Collaborative Expert Panel. (2011). Core competencies for interprofessional collaborative practice: Report of an expert panel. Washington, D.C.: Interprofessional Education Collaborative https://ipec.memberclicks.net/assets/2011-Original.pdf
46. Prescott J.E. Exploring the context: contemporary medical education // Am J Prev Med. 2011. 41(4). P. 160-163 doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2011.06.017.
47. Purcarea V.L. The impact of marketing strategies in healthcare systems // J Med Life. 2019. 12(2). P. 93-96. doi: 10.25122/jml-2019-1003.
48. Ricklefs W.P., Dosmagambetova R.S., Ricklefs I.M., Bukeeva A.S., et al. Peculiarities of medical education in Kazakhstan // Medical education and professional development. 2014. 4(18). P. 75-85.
49. Rabenu Eю, Shkoler O. A systematic and theoretical approach to the marketing of higher education // Front Psychol. 2022. 13. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.982347.
50. Reilly J.M., Plepys C.M., Cousineau M.R. Dual M.D. Degree Students in the United States: Moving the Medical Workforce Toward Population Health // Public Health Rep. 2021. 136(5). P. 640-647. doi: 10.1177/0033354920978422. Epub 2021 Feb 9.
51. Roberts C., Kumar K. Student learning in interprofessional practice-based environments: what does theory say? // BMC Med Educ. 2015. 15. P. 211. doi: 10.1186/s12909-015-0492-1.
52. Royeen Ch.B., Gail M.Je., Robin A.H. Leadership in interprofessional health education and practice. Jones & Bartlett Publishers, 2008. Рp.63
53. Ruiz M.G., Ezer H., Purden M. Exploring the nature of facilitating interprofessional learning: findings from an exploratory study // J Interprof Care. 2013. 27(6). P. 489-95. doi: 10.3109/13561820.2013.811640.
54. Salunke S., Lal D.K. Multisectoral approach for promoting public health // Indian J Public Health. 2017. 61(3). P. 163-168. doi: 10.4103/ijph.IJPH_220_17.
55. Schell S.F., Luke D.A., Schooley M.W., Elliott M.B., Herbers S.H., Mueller N.B., Bunger A.C. Public health program capacity for sustainability: a new framework // Implement Sci. 2013. 8(11). doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-8-15.
56. Shediac-Rizkallah M.C., Bone L.R. Planning for the sustainability of community-based health programs: conceptual frameworks and future directions for research, practice and policy // Health Educ Res. 2008. 13. P. 87–108.
57. Silver I.L., Leslie K. Faculty development for continuing interprofessional education and collaborative practice // J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2009. 29(3). P. 172-177. doi: 10.1002/chp.20032.
58. Singh A., Vellakkal S. Impact of public health programs on maternal and child health services and health outcomes in India: A systematic review // Soc Sci Med. 2021 doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.113795. 2021 Feb 23.
59. Steinert Y., Naismith L., Mann K. Faculty development initiatives designed to promote leadership in medical education. A BEME systematic review: BEME Guide No. 19. // Med Teach. 2012. 34(6). P. 483-503. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2012.680937.
60. Taylor B.S., Mazurek P.H., Gutierrez S., et al. Educational Outcomes of a 4-Year MD-MPH Dual-Degree Program: High Completion Rates and Higher Likelihood of Primary Care Residency // Acad Med. 2022. 97(6). P. 894-898. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000004603.
61. Thistlethwaite J. Interprofessional education: a review of context, learning and the research agenda // Med Educ. 2012. 46(1). P. 58-70. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2011.04143.x.
62. Universal health coverage (UHC) // Fact sheet. 12.12.2022. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/universal-health-coverage-(uhc) (accessed 23.07.2023)
63. van Diggele C., Roberts C., Burgess A., Mellis C. Interprofessional education: tips for design and implementation // BMC Med Educ. 2020. 20(2). P. 455. doi: 10.1186/s12909-020-02286-z.
64. White L.E. Success of the undergraduate public health at tulane university // Front Public Health. 2015. 3(60). doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2015.00060.
65. Willgerodt M.A., Abu-Rish Blakeney E., Brock D.M., Liner D., Murphy N., Zierler B. Interprofessional education and practice guide No. 4: Developing and sustaining interprofessional education at an academic health center // J Interprof Care. 2015. 29(5). P. 421-425. doi: 10.3109/13561820.2015.1039117.
66. Wiltsey Stirman S., Kimberly J., Cook N., Calloway A., Castro F., Charns M. The sustainability of new programs and innovations: a review of the empirical literature and recommendations for future research // Implementation science: IS. 2012. 17(17). рp?
67. World Health Organization 2010 Health Professions Networks Nursing & Midwifery Human Resources for Health Framework for Action on Interprofessional Education & Collaborative Practice https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/framework-for-action-on-interprofessional-education-collaborative-practice (accessed 22.05.2023)
68. World Health Organization 2022 Human Resources for Health leadership and management: a prototype curricula package: prototype curriculum for a one-month course https://9789240055988-eng.pdf (accessed 22.05.2023)
69. World Health Organization. Everybody's business: strengthening health systems to improve health outcomes. WHO's framework for action. Geneva: 2007. https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/43918 (accessed 22.05.2023)
70. Ziperstein D., Ruth B.J., Clement A., et al. Mapping Dual-Degree Programs in Social Work and Public Health: Results from a National Survey // Adv Soc Work. 2015. 16(2). P. 406-421. doi: 10.18060/18372.
Number of Views: 91
Category of articles:
Medical education
Bibliography link
Senbekov M.T. Interprofessional collaboration in public health high education and perspective of future specialists // Nauka i Zdravookhranenie [Science & Healthcare]. 2023, (Vol.25) 3, pp. 257-264. DOI 10.34689/SH.2023.25.3.032Related publications:
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDES, AND BEHAVIOR IN EVIDENCE-BASED NURSING PRACTICE AMONG ACADEMIC AND APPLIED BACHELOR'S DEGREE STUDENTS
SYSTEMIZING INTERNATIONAL ACADEMIC EXCHANGES AND THE ENROLLMENT OF STUDY ABROAD STUDENTS AND SUSTAINING THAT APPROACH: SEEKING TO ESTABLISH FURTHER COOPERATIVE FRAMEWORKS IN SEMEY AND JAPAN (KOCHI AND HIROSHIMA)
ANALYSIS OF THE FINAL ASSESSMENT OF DISCIPLINES OF STUDENTS OF THE SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, DENTISTRY, PHARMACY AND NURSING IN 2022-2023 ACADEMIC YEAR
ANALYSIS OF THE FINAL ASSESSMENT OF DISCIPLINES OF STUDENTS OF THE SCHOOL OF MEDICINE IN 2022-2023 ACADEMIC YEAR
INTERPROFESSIONAL COLLABORATION IN PUBLIC HEALTH HIGH EDUCATION AND PERSPECTIVE OF FUTURE SPECIALISTS