MODERN APPROACHES OF CERVICAL CANCER RADIATION TREATMENT. LITERATURE REVIEW.
Introduction: Cervical cancer is one of the most common oncological diseases in the world, as well as one of the causes of death in the female population worldwide. The study and development of new areas of modern oncogynecology in locally advanced stages of cervical cancer is one of the ways to solve this urgent problem. Objective: To present to the reader detailed overview of the epidemiological situation of cervical cancer, the evolution of radiation therapy from the beginning to the development of modern approaches to radiation treatment of cervical cancer, such as prophylactic irradiation of paraaortic lymph nodes. Materials: The authors conducted a literature search of current approaches to radiation therapy for cervical cancer using the appropriate keywords in the search engine PubMed and Google Scholar, in the Scopus database, Web of Science, MedLine, The Cochrane Library, Global Health, CyberLeninka and to others. Conclusions: Cervical cancer is a disease that has not lost its significance and has consistently high morbidity and mortality rates among all oncological diseases. Despite the successes achieved in the field of treatment, a number of promising areas remain that have not been fully studied in clinical trials. One of these areas is the prophylactic irradiation of paraaortic lymph nodes to improve patient outcomes, along with a reduction of the toxic effects associated with it, both in the short and long term.
Аlmagul S. Zhabagina1, http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8956-6286 Tasbolat A. Adylkhanov1, http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9092-5060 Marat N. Sandybayev2, https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1814-6628 Nailya A. Kabildina3, Kuantkan T. Zhabagin2, https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4304-5132 Laura A. Pak1, Olga B. Andreeva1, http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2802-9441 Yevgenia О. Kossymbayeva1, http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2893-0384 Gaukhar S. Kamzina1 1 NCJSC "Semey Medical University", Semey, Republic of Kazakhstan; 2 "Center of Nuclear Medicine and Oncology of Semey" Semey, Republic of Kazakhstan; 3 NCJSC "Karaganda Medical University", Karaganda, Republic of Kazakhstan.
1. Kaydarova D.R., Kairbaev M.R., Bolatbekova R.O. Epidemiology of cervical cancer in the Republic of Kazakhstan for 10 years (2007–2016) // Oncology issues. 2017. No. 4.P. 572-579. 2. Bray F., Jemal A., Grey N. et al. Global cancer transitions according to the Human Development Index (2008–2030): a population-based study // Lancet Oncol. 2012. Vol.13.P. 790–801. 3. Cade S. Radium treatment of cancer // Churchill, London. 1929. 4. Chemoradiotherapy for Cervical Cancer Meta-Analysis Collaboration. Reducing uncertainties about the effects of chemoradiotherapy for cervical cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of individual patient data from 18 randomized trials // J. Clin. Oncol. 2008. Vol. 26. P. 5802-5812. 5. Denny L. Cervical cancer: prevention and treatment // Discov. Med.2012 Vol.14. P. 125-131. 6. Ferlay J., Soerjomataram I., Ervik M. et al. GLOBOCAN 2012 v1.0, Cancer Incidence and Mortality Worldwide: IARC Cancer Base No. 11 [Internet]. Lyon: IARC. 2012. Available at http://globocan.iarc.fr 7. Fine B.A., Hempling R.E., Piver M.S. et al. Severe radiation morbidity in carcinoma of the cervix: impact of pretherapy surgical staging and previous surgery // Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 1995. Vol. 31. P. 717-723. 8. Gill B.S., Lin J.F., Krivak T.C., Sukumvanich P., Laskey R.A., Ross M.S., Lesnock J.L., Beriwal S. National Cancer Data Base analysis of radiation therapy consolidation modality for cervical cancer: the impact of new technological advancements // Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 2014. Vol. 90. P. 1083-1090. 9. Henschke U.K., Hilaris B.S., Mahan D.G. Intracavitary radiation therapy of uterine cancer by remote afterloading with cycling sources // Am. J. Roentgenol. 1966. Vol. 96. P. 45-51. 10. IARC. Biological agents // IARC Monogr. Eval. Carcinog. Risks Hum. Vol. 100B. 2012. P. 1–441. PMID:23189750. 11. Igissinov N., Nuralina I., Igissinova G., Kim S., Moore M., Igissinov S., Khassenova Z. Epidemiological aspects of morbidity and mortality from cervical cancer in Kazakhstan // Asian Pac. J. Cancer Prev. 2012. Vol. 13. P. 2345-2348. 12. Kausova G., Eleubaeva J., Shibanova A., Kusainova B. The problem of early detection of cervical cancer in the Republic of Kazakhstan // Georgian Med. News. 2013. Vol. 217. P. 11-15. 13. Keys H.M., Bundy B.N., Stehman F.B. et al. Cisplatin, radiation, and adjuvant hysterectomy compared with radiation and adjuvant hysterectomy for bulky stage IB cervical carcinoma // N. Engl. J. Med. 1999. Vol. 340. P. 1154-61. 14. Lanciano R.M., Martz K., Coia L.R. et al. Tumor and treatment factors improving outcome in stage III-B cervix cancer // Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys.1991. Vol. 20. P. 95-100. 15. Lanciano R.M., Won M., Hanks G.E. A reappraisal of the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics staging system for cervical cancer. A study of patterns of care // Cancer. 1992. Vol. 69. P. 482-487. 16. Lee J., Lin J.B., Chang C.L., Jan Y.T., Sun F.J., Wu M.H., Chen Y.J. Prophylactic lower para-aortic irradiation using intensity-modulated radiotherapy mitigates the risk of para-aortic recurrence in locally advanced cervical cancer: A 10-year institutional experience // Gynecol. Oncol. 2017. Vol. 146. P. 20-26. 17. Mboumba Bouassa R.S., Prazuck T., Lethu T., Jenabian M.A., Meye J.F., Bélec L. Cervical cancer in sub-Saharan Africa: a preventable noncommunicable disease // Expert Rev. Anti Infect. Ther. 2017. Vol. 15. P. 613-627. 18. Morris M., Eifel P.J., Lu J. et al. Pelvic radiation with concurrent chemotherapy compared with pelvic and para-aortic radiation for high-risk cervical cancer // N. Engl. J. Med. 1999. Vol. 340. P. 1137-1143. 19. Patel F.D., Sharma S.C., Negi P.S. et al. Low dose rate vs. high dose rate brachytherapy in the treatment of carcinoma of the uterine cervix: a clinical trial // Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 1994. Vol. 28. P. 335-341. 20. Pearcey R., Brundage M., Drouin P. et al. Phase III trial comparing radical radiotherapy with and without cisplatin chemotherapy in patients with advanced squamous cell cancer of the cervix // J. Clin. Oncol. 2002. Vol. 20. P. 966-972. 21. Peters W.A. 3rd, Liu P.Y., Barrett R.J. 2nd, et al. Concurrent chemotherapy and pelvic radiation therapy compared with pelvic radiation therapy alone as adjuvant therapy after radical surgery in high-risk early-stage cancer of the cervix // J. Clin. Oncol. 2000. Vol. 18. P. 1606-13. 22. Rose P.G., Bundy B.N., Watkins E.B. et al. Concurrent cisplatin-based radiotherapy and chemotherapy for locally advanced cervical cancer // N. Engl. J. Med. 1999. Vol. 340. P. 1144-1153. 23. Rose P.G., Bundy B.N. Chemoradiation for locally advanced cervical cancer: does it help? // J. Clin. Oncol. 2002. Vol. 20. P. 891-893. 24. Rotman M., Pajak T.F., Choi K., Clery M., Marcial V., Grigsby P.W. et al. Prophylactic extended-field irradiation of para-aortic lymph nodes in stages IIB and bulky IB and IIA cervical carcinomas. Ten-year treatment results of RTOG 79–20 // JAMA: the journal of the American Medical Association. 1995. Vol. 274. P. 387–393. 25. Small W. Jr., Bacon M.A., Bajaj A., Chuang L.T., Fisher B.J., Harkenrider M.M., Jhingran A., Kitchener H.C., Mileshkin L.R., Viswanathan A.N., Gaffney D.K.. Cervical cancer: A global health crisis // Cancer. 2017. Vol. 123. P. 2404-2412. 26. Stryker J.A., Mortel R. Survival following extended field irradiation in carcinoma of cervix metastatic to para-aortic lymph nodes // Gynecologic oncology. 2000. Vol. 79. P. 399–405. 27. Thomas G.M. Improved treatment for cervical cancer-concurrent chemotherapy and radiotherapy // N. Engl. J. Med. 1999. Vol. 340. P. 1198-1200. 28. Whitney C.W., Sause W., Bundy B.N. et al. Randomized comparison of fluorouracil plus cisplatin versus hydroxyurea as an adjunct to radiation therapy in stage IIB-IVA carcinoma of the cervix with negative para-aortic lymph nodes: a Gynecologic Oncology Group and Southwest Oncology Group study // J. Clin. Oncol. 1999. Vol. 17. P. 1339-1348. 29. Wickham D. Radiumtherapie. Instrumentarium. Technik. Behandlung von Krebsen, Keloiden, Naevi, Lupus, Pruritus, Neurodermitiden, Ekzemen, Verwendung in der Gynäkologie // Buch. Xi. 1910. 268 S.: 65s/w-Abbildungen, 51 Farbabbildungen, Bibliographien. Springer ISBN 978-3-642-50460-0 30. World Cancer Report. 2014. P. 17.
Количество просмотров: 658

Ключевые слова:

Библиографическая ссылка

Жабагина А.С., Адылханов Т.А., Сандыбаев М.Н., Кабилдина Н.А., Жабагин К.Т., Пак Л.А., Андреева О.Б., Косымбаева Е.О., Камзина Г.С. Современные подходы к лучевой терапии рака шейки матки. Обзор литературы // Наука и Здравоохранение. 2019. 6 (Т.21). С. 24-29.

Авторизируйтесь для отправки комментариев