Online ISSN: 3007-0244,
Print ISSN:  2410-4280
ANALYSIS OF THE SUPPLY OF MEDICAL DIAGNOSTIC EQUIPMENT DURING THE PANDEMIC IN KAZAKHSTAN
Background. Approximately 14% of people with COVID-19 develop a serious illness requiring hospitalization and oxygen support, 5% need hospitalization in the intensive care unit. At the beginning of the pandemic, countries faced a shortage of such specialized equipment. A complete oxygen system should consist of the following elements: oxygen sources, delivery devices, control and conditioning devices, and patient monitoring devices. Objective. To assess the supply of medical equipment during the pandemic in Kazakhstan. Materials and methods. We conducted a review of empirical studies, statistical data and case studies, reports of the World Health Organization, the United Nations and the World Bank, studies of public spending, the Global Health Expenditure Index. By the method of sales analysis based on a marketing plan, a mathematical model has been developed that allows optimizing sales surcharges and service fees in the implementation. Results. There is a surge in demand for medical equipment. The release of some diagnostic devices is carried out on JSC “Aktyubrentgen”. Pulsed X-ray machines have become widespread. 132 city and regional hospitals and 53 rural ones are equipped with the necessary diagnostic equipment. There is a 2.5-fold increase in investment. Conclusion. Timely adopted resolutions and the creation of customs-free conditions gave a positive result on deliveries. To improve the process of Kazakhstan's medical devices entering the international market, a step-by-step algorithm should be developed that would include marketing steps and follow-up actions to promote medical equipment.
Zhandulla Nakipov1, https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5528-693X Gaukhar Dauletova1, https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1621-8149 Karlygash Tebenova2, https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0648-7828 Serik Abdiraimov1, https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6435-3401 Zaituna A. Khismetova3, https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5937-3045 Assiya K. Turgambayeva1, https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2300-0105 1 NJSC «Astana Medical University», Department of Public Health and Management, Nur-Sultan, Republic of Kazakhstan; 2 Academician E.A. Buketov Karaganda University, Department of Special and Inclusive Education, Karaganda, Republic of Kazakhstan; 3 NJSC «Semey medical university», Semey, Republic of Kazakhstan.
1. Nvaeze E., Isienii S., Chzhengue L. Advanced cubic line search algorithm for solving multidimensional nonlinear optimization problems // Journal of the Nigerian Mathematical Society. 2013. 32(3):185-191. 2. Mettler F., Tomadsen B., Bkharvagan M., Gilly D., et al. Medical radiation exposure in the USA in 2019: preliminary results // Health Phys. 2008. 95: 502–507. 3. Hricak H., Brenner D.J., Adelstein S.J., Frush D.P., et al. Managing the use of radiation in medical imaging: a multifaceted task // Radiology. 2018. 258: 889–905. 4. Van Randen A., Bipat K., Winderman A., Ubbink D., et al. Acute appendicitis: meta-analysis of the diagnostic effectiveness of CT and ultrasound with stepwise compression depending on the prevalence of the disease // Radiology. 2018. 249: 97–106. 5. Rosen M.P., Sands D.Z., Longmaid H.E., Reynolds K.F. et al. The effect of abdominal CT on the management of patients admitted to the emergency department with acute abdominal pain // AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2017. 174: 1391–1396. 6. Rosen M.P., Siver B., Sands D.Z., Brumberg R., et al. The significance of computed tomography of the abdominal cavity in the emergency department for patients with abdominal pain // Eur Radiol. 2018. 13. 418–424. 7. Smith-Bindman R., Miglioretti D.L., Johnson E. et al. Use of diagnostic imaging studies and associated radiation exposure for patients included in large integrated healthcare systems, 2010-2018 // JAMA. 2018. 307: 2400–2409. 8. 2020 Diagnostic Imaging Equipment Service Outlook// Des Plaines, IL: IMG Medical Information Division, 2020. P.236. 9. Fasel R., Krumholz H.M., Wang Y., Ross J.S., et al. Exposure to low doses of ionizing radiation during medical imaging procedures // N Engl J Med. 2019. 361: 849–857. 10. Metler F.A., Bhagavan M., Faulkner K., Gilley D.B., et al. Research in the field of radiology and nuclear medicine in the USA and around the world: frequency, radiation dose and comparison with other radiation sources - 1950-2007 // Radiology. 2019. 253: 520–531. 11. Metler F.A., Uist P.V., Liukin J.A. CT scan: usage patterns and doses // J Radiol Prot. 2017. 20: 353–359. 12. Schauer D.A., Linton O.V. The report of the National Council for Radiation Protection and Measurements indicates a significant increase in medical exposure // Radiology. 2019. 253: 293–296. 13. Tsapaki V., Ahmed N.A., Al-Suwaidi J.S., Beganovich A. et al. Radiation exposure of patients during interventional procedures in 20 countries: first results of the IAEA project // AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2019. 193:559–569. 14. Mettler F.A., Bhargavan M., Tomadsen B.R., Gilly D.B. et al. The impact of nuclear medicine in the USA, 2015-2017: preliminary results // Semin Nucl Med. 2008. 38: 384–391. 15. Heiken J.P., Peterson C.M., Menias C.O. Virtual colonoscopy for colorectal cancer screening: current status. Cancer visualization // Specification. 2015. S:133 – 139. 16. Henschke K.I., Yankelevich D.F., Libby D.M., Pazmantier M.V. et al. Survival of patients with stage I lung cancer detected by CT // N Engl J Med. 2016. 355: 1763–1771. 17. Dempster B. National normalization of MRI in Australia affects the use of CT // BMJ. 2015. 346: f3929. 18. Freudenberg L.S., Beyer T. Subjective perception of radiation risk // J Nucl Med. 2015. 52: 29С – 35С. 19. Royal H.D. Low-level radiation effects - what's new? // Semin Nucl Med. 2018. 38: 392–402. 20. Chen SY. Decision making for late-phase recovery from nuclear or radiological incidents // Health Phys. 2015. 108, 161 – 169. (doi:10.1097/hp. 0000000000000233). 21. Kardis E., Vrijheid M., Blatner M. et al. Joint study of cancer risk among radiation industry workers in the nuclear industry in 15 countries: assessment of radiation-related cancer risk // Radiat Res. 2017. 167: 396–416. 22. Brenner D.J., Hall E.J. Computed tomography is a growing source of radiation exposure // N Engl J Med. 2017. 357: 2277–2284. 23. Berrington de Gonzalez A., Mahesh M., Kim K.P., Bhagavan M., et al. Predicted cancer risks based on computed tomography scans performed in the USA in 2007 // Arch Intern Med. 2019. 169: 2071–2077.
Количество просмотров: 386

Ключевые слова:

Категория статей: COVID-19 - Актуальная тема

Библиографическая ссылка

Nakipov Zh., Dauletova G., Tebenova K., Abdiraimov S., Khismetova Z.A., Turgambayeva A.K. Analysis of the supply of medical diagnostic equipment during the pandemic in Kazakhstan // Nauka i Zdravookhranenie [Science & Healthcare]. 2022, (Vol.24) 2, pp. 6-14. doi 10.34689/SH.2022.24.2.001

Авторизируйтесь для отправки комментариев