КЛИНИКО-ПАТОГЕНЕТИЧЕСКИЕ И ДИАГНОСТИЧЕСКИЕ АСПЕКТЫ ПАТОЛОГИИ НОСОСЛЕЗНОЙ ДРЕНАЖНОЙ СИСТЕМЫ
Введение. Cлезотечение является ведущим симптомом патологии носослезной дренажной системы (НСДС). Хроническое слезотечение ассоциируется со значительным снижением качества жизни пациентов. Не существует единого идеального метода визуализации для оценки НСДС, и большинство существующих методов визуализации дополняют друг друга.
Цель обзора — изучение роли лучевых методов диагностики в менеджменте пациентов с патологией НСДС.
Стратегия поиска. Поиск источников проводился в следующих базах данных: Pubmed, Google Scholar, Embase, Cyberleninka, eLibrary. В обзор были включены первичные исследования (описательные, аналитические, клинические исследования), вторичные исследования (систематические обзоры и метаанализы), клинические руководства и рекомендации, а также экспертные мнения, на русском и английском языках.
Результаты и заключение. Эпидемиологические характеристики заболеваний носослезной дренажной системы (НСДС) разнообразны и зависят от множества факторов, включая возраст, пол, этническую принадлежность и географическое расположение, а также доступность специализированной медицинской помощи. Хроническое слезотечение, часто являющееся основной причиной обращения в офтальмологию, сопровождается значительным ухудшением качества жизни. Спектр патологических состояний, сопровождающихся слезотечением, широк и имеет свои особенности как во взрослой, так и в детской офтальмологической практике. Разнообразие методов диагностики в современной дакриологии свидетельствует о необходимости унифицированных подходов в выборе методов лечения. В современной литературе отсутствуют стандартизированные лечебно-диагностические алгоритмы для оценки эффективности минимально инвазивных процедур при лечении непроходимости слезоотводящих путей, включая применение компьютерно-томографической дакриоцистографии.
Ключевые слова: слезотечение, носослезная дренажная система, дакриоцистография, компьютерная томография.
Жибек С. Даутбаева1, https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0619-3598
Жанар С. Абдрахманова1, https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1890-0862
Раушан И. Рахимжанова1, https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3490-6324
Зейнет У. Ахмедиянова1, https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3065-8973
Ақерке Макенқызы1, https://orcid.org/0009-0009-7806-1181
Наталья Ф.Такеева1,
Кульбарам М. Саитова1,
Асия А. Кусаинова2, https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5738-0804
Лаура Т. Касым1*, https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4448-6455
Adewara B.A., Badmus S.A., Awe O.O., Onakpoya O.H., Adegbehingbe B.O., Adeoye A.O. Epidemiology and Management of Oculoplastic Disorders at a Tertiary Hospital: A 4-Year Review. West African Journal of Medicine. 2022, 39(6), pp. 635-640.
2. Ali M.J. Etiopathogenesis of primary acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction (PANDO). Progress in retinal and eye research. 2023, 96, e.101193.
3. Ali M.J. Pediatric Acute Dacryocystitis. Ophthalmic plastic and reconstructive surgery. 2015, 31(5), pp. 341-347.
4. Ali M.J., Paulsen F. Etiopathogenesis of Primary Acquired Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction: What We Know and What We Need to Know. Ophthalmic plastic and reconstructive surgery. 2019, 35(5),:pp. 426-433.
5. Ali M.J., Schicht M., Paulsen F. Qualitative Hormonal Profiling of the Lacrimal Drainage System: Potential Insights into the Etiopathogenesis of Primary Acquired Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction. Ophthalmic plastic and reconstructive surgery. 2017, 33(5), pp.381-388.
6. Amrith S., Goh P.S., Wang S.C. Tear flow dynamics in the human nasolacrimal ducts — a pilot study using dynamic magnetic resonance imaging. Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology. 2005, 243, pp. 127–131.
7. Ansari S.A., Pak J., Shields M. Pathology and imaging of the lacrimal drainage system. Neuroimaging clinics of North America. 2005, 15(1), pp.221-237.
8. Arhipova E.N. Optimizacija metodov issledovanija zabolevanij slezootvodjashhih putej: dis. ... kand. med. nauk. – M., 2014. – 24 s.
9. Bartley G.B. Acquired lacrimal drainage obstruction: an etiologic classification system, case reports, and a review of the literature. Part 1. Ophthalmic plastic and reconstructive surgery. 1992, 8, pp. 237-242.
10. Caldemeyer K.S., Stockberger S.M. Jr, Broderick L.S. Topical contrast-enhanced CT and MR dacryocystography: imaging the lacrimal drainage apparatus of healthy volunteers. AJR. American journal of roentgenology. 1998, 171(6), pp.1501-1504
11. Cè M., Grimaldi E., Toto-Brocchi M., Martinenghi C., Oliva G., Felisaz P.F., et al. Non-contrast MR dacryocystography for the evaluation of epiphora and recurrent dacryocystitis: A preliminary study. The Neuroradiology Journal. 2023, 36(4), pp.397-403.
12. Ceylanoglu K.S., Acar A., Sen E. Overview of Epiphora Referred to Oculoplastic Surgery Clinic in Adults. Beyoglu eye journal. 2023, 8(1), pp.45-49
13. Chi Y.C., Lin C.C., Chiu T.Y. Microbiology and Antimicrobial Susceptibility in Adult Dacryocystitis. Clinical ophthalmology. 2024, 18, pp.575-582.
14. Coskun B., Ilgit E., Onal B., Konuk O., Erbas G. MR dacryocystography in the evaluation of patients with obstructive epiphora treated by means of interventional radiologic procedures. AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology. 2012, 33(1), pp.141-147
15. Das A.V., Rath S., Naik M.N., Ali M.J. The Incidence of Lacrimal Drainage Disorders Across a Tertiary Eye Care Network: Customization of an Indigenously Developed Electronic Medical Record System-eyeSmart. Ophthalmic plastic and reconstructive surgery. 2019, 35(4), pp.354-356
16. Dantas R.R. Lacrimal drainage system obstruction. Seminars in ophthalmology. 2010, 25(3), pp. 98-103
17. Delaney Y., Khooshabeh R. Lipogranuloma following traumatic dacryocystography in a 4-year-old boy. Eye (London, England). 2001, 15(Pt 5), pp.683-684.
18. Fasina O., Ogbole G.I. CT assessment of the nasolacrimal canal in a black African Population. Ophthalmic plastic and reconstructive surgery. 2013, 29(3), pp.231-233.
19. Garreis F., Gottschalt M., Schlorf T., Gläser R., Harder J., Worlitzsch D., Paulsen, F. Expression and regulation of antimicrobial peptide psoriasin (S100A7) at the ocular surface and in the lacrimal apparatus. Investigative ophthalmology & visual science. 2011, 52(7), pp.4914-4922.
20. Galloway J.E., Kavic T.A., Raflo G.T. Digital subtraction macrodacryocystography: A new method of lacrimal system imaging. Ophthalmology. 1984, 91, pp.956–962.
21. Gilliland G. Dacryocystitis. Textbook of Ophthalmology. 1st ed. New Delhi: Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd; 2002. pp. 705–712.
22. Glatt H.J., Chan A.C., Barrett L. Evaluation of dacryocystorhinostomy failure with computed tomography and computed tomographic dacryocystography. American Journal of Ophthalmology. 1991, 112(4), pp. 431-436
23. Goldberg R.A., Heinz G.W., Chiu L. Gadolinium magnetic resonance imaging dacryocystography. American Journal of Ophthalmology. 1993, 115(6), pp.738-741
24. Heichel J., Struck H.G., Glien A. Diagnostics and treatment of lacrimal duct diseases: A structured patient-centred care concept. HNO. 2018, 66(10), pp.751-759
25. Higashi H., Tamada T., Mizukawa K., Ito K. MR dacryocystography: comparison with dacryoendoscopy in positional diagnosis of nasolacrimal duct obstruction. La Radiologia medica. 2016, 121(7), pp. 580-587
26. Janssen A.G., Mansour K., Bos J.J., Castelijns J.A. Diameter of the bony lacrimal canal: normal values and values related to nasolacrimal duct obstruction: assessment with CT. AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology. 2001, 22(5), pp. 845-850.
27. Janssen A.G., Mansour K., Bos J.J. Obstructed nasolacrimal duct system in epiphora: long-term results of dacryocystoplasty by means of balloon dilation. Radiology. 1997, 205, pp.791-796.
28. Kakizaki H., Takahashi Y., Sa H.S, Ichinose A., Iwaki M. Congenital dacryocystocele: comparative findings of dacryoendoscopy and histopathology in a patient. Ophthalmic plastic and reconstructive surgery. 2012, 28, e.85–86.
29. Kanski J.J., Bowling B. Lacrimal drainage system. Clinical ophthalmology: a systematic approach. 7th edition. Edinburgh (United Kingdom): Elsevier; 2011. p. 65–78.
30. Kels B.D., Grzybowski A., Grant-Kels J.M. Human ocular anatomy. Clinics in Dermatology. 2015, 33(2), pp.140-146.
31. Keren S., Abergel A., Manor A., Rosenblatt A., Koenigstein D., Leibovitch, I., et al. Endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy: reasons for failure. Eye (London, England). 2020, 34(5), p.948-953.
32. Kim Y., Park J.Y., Lew H. Clinical Implication of Dacryoendoscopy in the Patients with Tearing: A Systematic Review. Korean journal of ophthalmology : KJO. 2023, 37(3), pp. 245-254
33. Klinicheskie rekomendatsii «Vrozhdennaya patologiya slezootvodyashhikh putei (dakriotsistit novorozhdennykh, dakriotsistotsele, vrozhdennyi stenoz slezootvodyashhikh putei) u novorozhdennykh i detei pervogo goda zhizni. Diagnostika i lechenie». Obshherossiiskaya obshhestvennaya organizatsiya «Assotsiatsiya vrachei oftal'mologov», MZ RF [Clinical recommendations “Congenital pathology of the lacrimal ducts (dacryocystitis of newborns, dacryocystocele, congenital stenosis of the lacrimal ducts) in newborns and children of the first year of life. Diagnostics and treatment." All-Russian public organization "Association of Ophthalmologists", Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation], 2023. 126p. [in Russian]
34. Lee J., Lee H.K., Lee H., Chang M., Park M., Baek S. Epidemiology of Oculoplastic and Reconstructive Surgeries Performed by a Single Specialist With 15 Years' Experience at a Tertiary Center. The Journal of craniofacial surgery. 2015, 26(4), e:308-311
35. Lee S.M., Lew H. Transcanalicular endoscopic dacryoplasty in patients with primary acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction. Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology. 2021, 259, pp.173–180.
36. Linberg J.V., McCormick S.A. Primary acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction. A clinicopathologic report and biopsy technique. Ophthalmology. 1986, 93(8), pp.1055-1063.
37. Majidaee M., Mohammadi M., Sheikh M.R., Khademlu M., Gorji M.H. Patients undergoing dacryocystorhinostomy surgery in northern Iran: an epidemiologic study. Annals of medical and health sciences research. 2014, 4(3), pp.365-368.
38. Makselis A., Petroska D., Kadziauskiene A., Jaruseviciene R., Ruzgys A., Cimbalas A., et al. Acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction: clinical and histological findings of 275 cases. BMC Ophthalmology. 2022, 22(1), p.12.
39. Maliborski A, Różycki R. Diagnostic imaging of the nasolacrimal drainage system. Part I. Radiological anatomy of lacrimal pathways. Physiology of tear secretion and tear outflow. Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research. 2014, 20, pp.628-638.
40. Malik S.R., Gupta A.K., Chaterjee S., Bhardwaj O.P., Saha M. Dacryocystography of normal and pathological lacrimal passages. The British journal of ophthalmology. 1969, 53(3), pp.174-179.
41. Mansfield D.C., Zeki S.M., Mackenzie J.R. Case report: extravasation of lipiodol--a complication of dacryocystography. Clinical radiology. 1994, 49(3), pp. 217-218.
42. Manfrè L., de Maria M., Todaro E., Mangiameli A., Ponte F., Lagalla R. MR dacryocystography: comparison with dacryocystography and CT dacryocystography // AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology. 2000, 21(6), pp.1145-1150.
43. Mareev O.V., Mareev G.O., Cymbal D.D. Assistirovannye i robot-assistirovannye funktsional'nye endoskopicheskie rinokhirurgicheskie vmeshatel'stva (obzor) [Assisted and robot-assisted functional endoscopic rhinosurgery (review)]. Saratovskii nauchno-meditsinskii zhurnal [Saratov Scientific and Medical Journal]. 2021, 17(3), pp. 415-421.
44. Mc Ewen C.J.,Young J.D.H. Epiphora during the first year of life. Eye. 1991, 5, pp.596–600.
45 Millman A.L., Liebeskind A., Putterman A.M. Dacryocystography: the technique and its role in the practice of ophthalmology. Radiologic clinics of North America. 1987,25(4), pp.781–6.
46. Mills D.M., Meyer D.R. Acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction. Otolaryngologic Clinics of North America. 2006, 39(5), pp.979
47. Milder B., Demorest B.H. Dacryocystography. I. The normal lacrimal apparatus. A.M.A. archives of ophthalmology. 1954, 51(2), pp.180-195.
48. Mimura M., Ueki M., Oku H., Sato B., Ikeda T. Evaluation of granulation tissue formation in lacrimal duct post silicone intubation and its successful management by injection of prednisolone acetate ointment into the lacrimal duct // Japanese journal of ophthalmology. 2016, 60(4), pp.280-285
49. Mukherjee B., Dhobekar M. Traumatic nasolacrimal duct obstruction: clinical profile, management, and outcome. European journal of ophthalmology. 2013, 23(5), pp.615-622.
50. Munk P.L., Burhenne L.W., Buffam F.V., Nugent R.A., Lin D.T. Dacryocystography: comparison of water-soluble and oil-based contrast agents. Radiology. 1989, 173(3), pp.827-830
51. Nemet A.Y. The Etiology of Epiphora: A Multifactorial Issue. Seminars in ophthalmology. 2016, 31(3), pp.275-279.
52. Nykamp S.G., Scrivani P.V., Pease A.P. Computed tomography dacryocystography evaluation of the nasolacrimal apparatus. Veterinary radiology & ultrasound : the official journal of the American College of Veterinary Radiology and the International Veterinary Radiology Association. 2004, 45, pp.23-28.
53. Örge F.H., Boente C.S. The lacrimal system. Pediatric Clinics of North America. 2014, 61(3), pp.529-539.
54. Patella F., Panella S., Zannoni S., Jannone M. L., Pesapane F., Angileri S.A., et al. The role of interventional radiology in the treatment of epiphora. Gland Surgery. 2018, 7(2), pp. 103-110.
55. Patil R., Dehari D., Chaudhuri A., Kumar D.N., Kumar D., Singh S., et al. Recent advancements in nanotechnology-based bacteriophage delivery strategies against bacterial ocular infections. Microbiological research. 2023, 273, e.127413.
56. Paulsen F., Hallmann U., Paulsen J., Thale A. Innervation of the cavernous body of the human efferent tear ducts and function in tear outflow mechanism. Journal of anatomy. 2000, 197(Pt 2), pp.177-187
57. Paulsen F.P., Pufe T., Schaudig U., Held-Feindt J., Lehmann J., Schröder J.M., et al. Detection of natural peptide antibiotics in human nasolacrimal ducts. Investigative ophthalmology & visual science. 2001, 42(10), pp.2157–2163.
58. Pinar-Sueiro S., Sota M., Lerchundi T.X., Gibelalde A., Berasategui B., Vilar B., et al. Dacryocystitis: Systematic Approach to Diagnosis and Therapy. Current infectious disease reports. 2021, doi.org/10.1007/s11908-012-0238-8
59. Qian Z.B., Yu B., Yang Y., Fang W., Dong J.L., Wei L.Q. Investigation of lacrimal sac space-occupying lesions using color doppler ultrasound, computed tomography, and computed tomography dacryocystography. International journal of ophthalmology. 2023, 16(8), pp.1224-1230
60. Rodriguez H.P., Kittleson A.C. Distension dacryocystography. Radiology. 1973,109(2), pp.317-321.
61. Sasaki H., Takano T., Murakami A. Direct endoscopic probing for congenital lacrimal duct obstruction. Clinical & experimental ophthalmology. 2013, 41, pp.729–734.
62. Saleh G.M., Gauba V., Tsangaris P., Tharmaseelan K. Digital subtraction dacryocystography and syringing in the management of epiphora. Orbit. 2007, 26(4), pp. 249-253.
63. Saraç K., Hepşen I.F., Bayramlar H., Uguralp M., Toksöz M., Baysal T. Computed tomography dacryocystography. European journal of radiology. 1995, 19(2), pp.128–131.
64. Shen G.L., Ng J.D., Ma X.P. Etiology, diagnosis, management and outcomes of epiphora referrals to an oculoplastic practice. Internaional Journal of Ophthalmology. 2016, 9(12), pp.1751-1755.
65. Shigeta K., Takegoshi H., Kikuchi S. Sex and age differences in the bony nasolacrimal canal: an anatomical study. Archives of ophthalmology (Chicago, Ill.: 1960). 2007, 125(12), pp.1677-1681.
66. Shkol'nik S.F. Sovremennye podkhody k diagnostike i lecheniyu zabolevanii slezootvodyachhego trakta [Modern approaches to the diagnosis and treatment of diseases of the lacrimal tract]. Prakticheskaya meditsina [Practical medicine]. 2012, 2(4), pp. 173-176.
67. Singh S., Ali M.J. A review of diagnostic and therapeutic dacryoendoscopy. Ophthalmic plastic and reconstructive surgery. 2019, 35, p.519–524.
68. Singhla A., Ballal S., Guruvaiah N., Ponnatapura J. Evaluation of epiphora by topical contrast-enhanced CT and MR dacryocystography: which one to choose? Acta radiologica (Stockholm, Sweden : 1987). 2023, 64(3), pp.1056-1061.
69. Su Y., Zhan L., Li, L., Fa X., Xiao, C. Surgical procedure of canaliculoplasty in the treatment of primary canaliculitis associated with canalicular dilatation. BMC Ophthalmology. 2020, 20(1), p.245
70. Tan M.C., Young S., Amrith S., Sundar G. Epidemiology of oculoplastic conditions: the Singapore experience. Orbit. 2012, 31(2), pp.107-113
71. Trimarchi M., Vinciguerra A., Resti A.G., Giordano L., Bussi M. Multidisciplinary approach to lacrimal system diseases. Acta otorhinolaryngologica Italica. 2021, 41(Suppl. 1), S:102-S107.
72. Tsai C.Y., Jiesisibieke Z..L, Tao P., Wang Y. C., Jiesisibieke D., Chien C.W., et al. Prevalence of eye and adnexal disorders among elderly inmates in Taiwan prisons. BMC Public Health. 2024, 24(1), p.334.
73. Tucker N., Chow D., Stockl F., Codère F., Burnier M. Clinically suspected primary acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction: clinicopathologic review of 150 patients. Ophthalmology, 1997. 104(11), 1882–1886. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0161-6420(97)30012-8
74. Udhay P., Noronha O.V., Mohan R.E. Helical computed tomographic dacryocystography and its role in the diagnosis and management of lacrimal drainage system blocks and medial canthal masses. Indian Journal of Ophthalmology. 2008, 56(1), pp.31-37.
75. Ugurbas S.H., Zilelioglu G., Saatci M. Otolaryngological findings in congenital duct obstruction and implications for prognosis. The British journal of ophthalmology. 2000, 84, pp.917–918.
76. Wang J., Zhang H.., Yan J, Zhang T. Literature review on the distribution characteristics and antimicrobial resistance of bacterial pathogens in neonatal sepsis. The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine. 2022, 35(5), pp. 861-870.
77. Weil D., Aldecoa J.P., Heidenreich A.M. Diseases of the lacrimal drainage system. Current opinion in ophthalmology. 2001, 12(5), pp.352-356.
78. Weber R.K., Keerl R, Schaefer S.D., Della Rocca R.C. Atlas of Lacrimal Surgery, Vol. 10. Springer Science & Business Media; 2007. 156p.
79. Woog J.J. The incidence of symptomatic acquired lacrimal outflow obstruction among residents of Olmsted County, Minnesota, 1976-2000 (an American Ophthalmological Society thesis). Transactions of the American Ophthalmological Society. 2007, 105, pp. 649-666.
80. Yazici B., Yazici Z. Frequency of the common canaliculus: a radiological study. Archives of ophthalmology (Chicago, Ill.: 1960). 2000, 118(10), pp.1381–1385.
81. Yang J.W., Oh H.N. Success rate and complications of endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy with unciformectomy. Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology. 2012, 250, pp.1509–1513.
82. https://tardokanatomy.ru/content/glaz-i-organy-zreniya (date of access April 27, 2024).
Количество просмотров: 326
Категория статей:
Обзор литературы
Библиографическая ссылка
Даутбаева Ж.С., Абдрахманова Ж.С., Рахимжанова Р.И., Ахмедиянова З.У., Макенқызы А., Такеева Н.Ф., Саитова К.М., Кусаинова А.А., Касым Л.Т. Клинико-патогенетические и диагностические аспекты патологии носослезной дренажной системы // Наука и Здравоохранение. 2024. Т.26 (3). С. 144-154. doi 10.34689/SH.2024.26.3.017Похожие публикации:
ГЕНЕТИЧЕСКИЕ БИОМАРКЕРЫ ОСТРОГО ОТТОРЖЕНИЯ ТРАНСПЛАНТАТА ПОСЛЕ ТРАНСПЛАНТАЦИИ СЕРДЦА
ОРГАНИЗАЦИЯ МЕДИЦИНСКОЙ ПОМОЩИ ПОЖИЛЫМ ЛЮДЯМ. ОБЗОР МЕЖДУНАРОДНОГО ОПЫТА.
ИНСТРУМЕНТЫ И КЛЮЧЕВЫЕ АСПЕКТЫ ОЦЕНКИ КУЛЬТУРЫ БЕЗОПАСНОСТИ ПАЦИЕНТОВ В МЕДИЦИНСКИХ ОРГАНИЗАЦИЯХ
ПРИНЦИПЫ БЕЗОПАСНОСТИ ПРИ АНЕСТЕЗИОЛОГИЧЕСКОМ ОБЕСПЕЧЕНИИ ХИРУРГИЧЕСКИХ ВМЕШАТЕЛЬСТВ ПРИ БЕРЕМЕННОСТИ. ОБЗОР ЛИТЕРАТУРЫ.
ВЛИЯНИЕ КЛОНАЛЬНОГО ГЕМАТОПОЭЗА С НЕОПРЕДЕЛЕННЫМ ПОТЕНЦИАЛОМ (CHIP) НА РАЗВИТИЕ АТЕРОСКЛЕРОЗА