Online ISSN: 3007-0244,
Print ISSN:  2410-4280
PERCEPTIONS OF WORK PROCESSES AND ORGANIZATIONAL DYNAMICS IN HOSPITAL GYNECOLOGY DEPARTMENTS
Introduction. Providing quality care is a priority of the healthcare system. One of the key attributes of quality care is effective teamwork within hospital departments and communication between medical specialists and patients. Aim: to study the current practice and perceptions of work processes and organizational dynamics in hospital gynecology departments in Almaty city. Materials and methods. The cross-sectional study was conducted in the first half of 2024. We developed a survey for hospital gynecologists, which was conducted with the support of the Almaty city health department and the heads of medical organizations. Participation in the survey was voluntary and anonymous, and respondent could complete the survey at any time convenient for them. Results. The survey showed that the majority of respondents, both doctors and nurses had more than 11 years’ of work experience, and most reported job satisfaction. A large portion of respondents, especially nurses (75.6%), believed that medical errors resulted in reprimands, while 46.3% agreed that the administration regularly reviews processes to improve patient safety. Additionally, 47.2% felt that incident reporting often focused on the person rather than the issue, with 42.2% of nurses disagreeing compared to 31.7% of doctors. While 50.8% of doctors and 51.1% of nurses agreed that the department promotes learning from mistakes, 24.4% of nurses were uncertain, and 20.4% expressed fear when raising concerns, with nurses experiencing more fear (p < 0.001). Furthermore, 34.3% of respondents, particularly doctors (46%), believed the manager expects faster work under pressure, while 48.9% of nurses were unsure. Conclusion. Both groups reported high professional experience and job satisfaction, but nurses expressed more uncertainty, particularly regarding error management and communication. The findings highlight the need for better communication, increased support for nurses, and a stronger safety culture that encourages staff to voice concerns without fear.
Bakhyt M. Sultanbekova - 3st year PhD student in the educational program "Public Health", Al-Farabi Kazakh National University, Almaty, Republic of Kazakhstan. E-mail: dr_sultanbekova@mail.ruж, https://orcid.org/ 0009-0007-9935-7243 Phone: +77077290146 Aizhan Raushanova – Associate professor, Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Evidence-Based Medicine Al-Farabi Kazakh National University, Almaty, Republic of Kazakhstan. E-mail: Aizhan.Raushanova@kaznu.kz, https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4584-885X, 8(727)221 16 22 Nazgul Akhtayeva - Associate professor, Biostatistics and Basics of the scientific research department, Asfendiyarov Kazakh National Medical University, Almaty, Republic of Kazakhstan, e-mail: akhtaeva_nazgul@mail.ru, https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0835-9814; +77772470074 Nurgul Alekenova - PhD, Department evidencebased medicine, Marat Ospanov West Kazakhstan Medical University, Aktobe, Republic of Kazakhstan, knurgul7@mail.ru; https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5751-1678, +77759230893. Eleonora Nurbaulina - PhD, Department of the General Medical practice of Marat Ospanov West Kazakhstan Medical University, Aktobe, Republic of Kazakhstan, Eleonora_71@bk.ru, https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0124-2848, +77019898410; Talgar Abilov - Candidate of Medical Science General Medicine Dean of Marat Ospanov West Kazakhstan Medical University, Aktobe, Republic of Kazakhstan abilovtalgar@gmail.com, https://orcid.org/0009-0001-8417-7924, +77022272813
1. Каупбаева Б.Т., Нурманова С.А., Бижигитова Р.Е. Развитие системы аккредитации в Казахстане на основе глобальной концепции первичной медико-санитарной помощи Всемирной Организации Здравоохранения. Журнал развития здравоохранения 2018. №3 (28). С.34-38. URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/razvitie-sistemy-akkreditatsii-v-kazahstane-na-osnove-globalnoy-kontseptsii-pervichnoy-mediko-sanitarnoy-pomoschi-vsemirnoy-1 (data obrashcheniya: 14.01.2024). 2. Нургазинов Б.К. Урегулирование споров о медицинских инцидентах в порядке медиации в контексте норм АППК РК. АМЖ. 2020. №4. С.1-11. URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/uregulirovanie-sporov-o-meditsinskih-intsidentah-v-poryadke-mediatsii-v-kontekste-norm-appk-rk (data obrashcheniya: 14.01.2024). 3. Addis B.A., Gelaw Y.M., Eyowas F.A., Bogale T.W., Aynalem Z.B., Guadie H.A. Time wasted by health professionals is time not invested in patients: time management practice and associated factors among health professionals at public hospitals in Bahir Dar, Efhiopia: a multicenter mixed method study. Front Public Health. 2023 Jul 21;11:1159275. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1159275. 4. Alzoubi M.M., Al-Mahasneh A., Al-Mugheed K., Al Barmawi M., Alsenany S.A., Farghaly Abdelaliem S.M. Medication Administration Error Perceptions Among Critical Care Nurses: A Cross-Sectional, Descriptive Study. J Multidiscip Healthc. 2023 May 30;16:1503-1512. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S411840. 5. Bhati D., Deogade M.S., Kanyal D. Improving Patient Outcomes Through Effective Hospital Administration: A Comprehensive Review. Cureus. 2023 Oct 26;15(10):e47731. doi: 10.7759/cureus.47731. 6. Chang C.P, Chou C.L, Chou Y.C, Shao C.C., Su H.I., Chen T.J, Chou L.F., Yu H.C. The ecology of gynecological care for women. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2014 Jul 31;11(8):7669-77. doi: 10.3390/ijerph110807669. 7. Detlefs S.E., Goffman D., Buttle R.A, Crump C.M., Thornburg L.L., Foley M.R., Deering S. Correlation between medical management and teamwork in multidisciplinary high-fidelity obstetrics simulations. Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2022 Jul;4(4):100626. doi: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2022.100626. 8. Goldsby E., Goldsby M., Neck C.B., Neck C.P. Under Pressure: Time Management, Self-Leadership, and the Nurse Manager. Administrative Sciences. 2020; 10(3):38. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci10030038 9. Hawkins S.F., Morse J.M. Untenable Expectations: Nurses' Work in the Context of Medication Administration, Error, and the Organization. Glob Qual Nurs Res. 2022 Nov 13;9:23333936221131779. doi: 10.1177/23333936221131779. 10. Keats J.P. Leadership and Teamwork: Essential Roles in Patient Safety. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 2019 Jun;46(2):293-303. doi: 10.1016/j.ogc.2019.01.008. 11. Klemann D., Rijkx M., Mertens H., van Merode F., Klein D. Causes for Medical Errors in Obstetrics and Gynaecology. Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Jun 2;11(11):1636. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11111636. 12. Lippke S., Wienert J., Keller F.M., Derksen C., Welp A., Kötting L., Hofreuter-Gätgens K., Müller H., Louwen F., Weigand M., Ernst K., Kraft K., Reister F., Polasik A., Huener Nee Seemann B., Jennewein L., Scholz C., Hannawa A. Communication and patient safety in gynecology and obstetrics - study protocol of an intervention study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Nov 28;19(1):908. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4579-y. 13. MacGillivray T.E. Advancing the Culture of Patient Safety and Quality Improvement. Methodist Debakey Cardiovasc J. 2020 Jul-Sep;16(3):192-198. doi: 10.14797/mdcj-16-3-192. 14. Mauti G., Githae M. Medical error reporting among physicians and nurses in Uganda. Afr Health Sci. 2019 Dec;19(4):3107-3117. doi: 10.4314/ahs.v19i4.33. 15. Obermann K., Chanturidze T., Richardson E., Tanirbergenov S., Shoranov M., Nurgozhaev A. Data for development in health: a case study and monitoring framework from Kazakhstan. BMJ Glob Health. 2016 Apr 18;1(1):e000003. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2015-000003. 16. Peyrovi H., Nikbakht Nasrabadi A., Valiee S. Exploration of the barriers of reporting nursing errors in intensive care units: A qualitative study. J Intensive Care Soc. 2016 Aug;17(3):215-221. doi: 10.1177/1751143716638370. 17. Pronovost P.J., Holzmueller C.G., Ennen C.S., Fox H.E. Overview of progress in patient safety. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011; 204(1):5–10. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2010.11.001. 18. Rodziewicz T.L., Houseman B., Vaqar S., Hipskind J.E. Medical Error Reduction and Prevention. 2024 Feb 12. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2025 Jan– 19. Rosen M.A., DiazGranados D., Dietz A.S., Benishek L.E., Thompson D., Pronovost P.J., Weaver S.J. Teamwork in healthcare: Key discoveries enabling safer, high-quality care. Am Psychol. 2018 May-Jun;73(4):433-450. doi: 10.1037/amp0000298. 20. Schrappe M. Sicherheit in der Gesundheitsversorgung: neu denken, gezielt verbessern [APS Report on Patient safety] 1. Berlin: Medizinisch Wissenschaftliche Verlagsgesellschaft; 2018. APS-Weißbuch Patientensicherheit. 21. Silén-Lipponen M., Tossavainen K., Turunen H., Smith A. Potential errors and their prevention in operating room teamwork as experienced by Finnish, British and American nurses. Int J Nurs Pract. 2005 Feb;11(1):21-32. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-172X.2005.00494.x. 22. Weiseth A., Plough A., Aggarwal R., Galvin G., Rucker A., Henrich N., Miller K., Subramanian L., Hawrusik R., Berry W., Gullo S, Spigel L., Dever K., Loveless D., Graham K., Paek B., Shah N.T. Improving communication and teamwork during labor: A feasibility, acceptability, and safety study. Birth. 2022 Dec;49(4):637-647. doi: 10.1111/birt.12630. 23. Wijeratne D., Fiander A. Gynaecological disease in the developing world: a silent pandemic. The Obstetrician & Gynaecologist 2018. https://doi.org/10.1111/tog.12515
Количество просмотров: 78

Ключевые слова: gynecology, women's health, medical care, hospital.


Библиографическая ссылка

Sultanbekova B.M., Raushanova A., Akhtayeva N., Alekenova N., Nurbaulina E., Abilov T. Perceptions of work processes and organizational dynamics in hospital gynecology departments // Nauka i Zdravookhranenie [Science & Healthcare]. 2025. Vol.27 (1), pp. 107-115. doi 10.34689/SH.2024.27.1.013

Авторизируйтесь для отправки комментариев