PELVIC INJURIES IN SEMEY CITY: CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY
Introduction: pelvic injuries as part of a combined injury are a serious medical problem, the mortality rate from which, according to various authors, reaches 60% [1, 4] (Adam Starr, Joseph P. Miney, 2002). Although the prevalence of pelvic injuries is relatively low, accounting for about 16% of the total number of injuries [16], unstable pelvic fractures accompanied by shock and bleeding are particularly dangerous [20]. Only a limited number of publications are devoted to the epidemiology of pelvic injuries, including an analysis of the age and sex distribution of patients [14], the circumstances of the injury, anatomical localization of injuries, and other characteristics [3]. The purpose of this study is to conduct an epidemiological analysis of patients with pelvic bone injuries admitted to the emergency hospital in Semey, East Kazakhstan region (Kazakhstan).
Material and methods: This study is a descriptive retrospective study within a single educational institution. The work was carried out within the framework of the grant financing of the project of the Ministry of Education and Science of the Republic of Kazakhstan: IRN AP05135531 “Development of a system of ortho-surgical rehabilitation of pelvic bone injuries in road accidents in the Republic of Kazakhstan.” A cross-sectional study was conducted. It included all cases of pelvic injuries (N = 250) for the period from 01.01.2013 to 31.12.2017.
Results: The study included the results of an examination of 250 victims with pelvic bone injuries who underwent inpatient treatment at the Semey State Emergency Hospital from 01.01.2013 to 31.12.2017. 46.8% (117 people) of the victims were men, 53.2% (133 people) were women. Pelvic bone injuries were reported during the year: 20.8% (N = 52) in spring, 24.4% (N = 61) in winter, 22.4% (N = 56) in summer, and 32.4% (N = 81) in autumn. 93.2% (N =233) of the victims did not require surgical treatment, and 6.8% (N =17) were treated surgically. 97.2% (N = 243) of the injured were discharged.
Conclusion: Traffic accidents and falls from heights are the main causes of pelvic injuries, which highlights the need for stricter traffic rules compliance. The distribution of injuries according to the AO-Tile classification showed a predominance of type A (54.4%) and type B (41.2%).
Elnara I. Efendiyeva – PhD candidate, lecturer, NJSC “Semey Medical University”, Semey, Republic of Kazakhstan, phone: +7 778 338 71 88, e-mail: elnara.efendieva@mail.ru, https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4506-1619
Yersin T. Zhunusov – General Director of the “International Scientific Center of Traumatology and Orthopedics”, Chief Freelance Traumatologist of the Almaty Region, Semey, Republic of Kazakhstan, phone: +7 702 191 67 47, e-mail: ersin-surgery@mail.ru, https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1182-5257
Assylzhan M. Mesova – Lecturer, NJSC “Semey Medical University”, Semey, Republic of Kazakhstan, phone: +7 777 213 83 07, e-mail: assylzhan2006@mail.ru, https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5373-0523
Zhamal D. Zhaparova – Lecturer, NJSC “Semey Medical University”, Semey, Republic of Kazakhstan, phone: +7 778 570 98 33, e-mail: zhamal231290@mail.ru, https://orcid.org/0009-0002-1970-4414
Aidos S. Tlemisov – Director of the “Center for Habilitation and Rehabilitation of Persons with Disabilities of Abai Region”, Department of Employment Coordination and Social Programs of the Abai Region, Semey, Republic of Kazakhstan, phone: +7 775 791 36 56, e-mail: aidos_8668@mail.ru, https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4239-6627
1. Adam Starr, Joseph P. Minei G.E.O. The importance of fracture pattern in guiding therapeutic decision-making in patients with hemorrhagic shock and pelvic ring disruptions. The Journal of Trauma: Injury, Infection, and Critical Care. 2002. № 3 (53). C. 446–451.
2. Ando J. [и др.]. Epidemiology of fragility fracture of the pelvic ring: a regional population-based study in Northern Japan // Archives of osteoporosis. 2023. № 1 (18). С.131-138.
3. Andrich S. [и др.]. Epidemiology of Pelvic Fractures in Germany: Considerably High Incidence Rates among Older People. PLOS ONE. 2015. № 9 (10). C. e0139078.
4. Ansorge A. [и др.]. Inter- and intraobserver reliability assessment of the 2018 AO/OTA classification for high-energy pelvic ring injuries: A retrospective study. Orthopaedics & traumatology, surgery & research : OTSR. 2021. № 6 (107).
5. Chueire A.G. [и др.]. Fraturas do anel pélvico: estudo epidemiológico. Acta Ortopédica Brasileira. 2004. № 1 (12). C. 05–11.
6. Cuthbert R. [и др.]. Epidemiology of pelvic and acetabular fractures across 12-mo at a level-1 trauma center. World Journal of Orthopedics. 2022. № 8 (13). C. 744–752.
7. Damasceno E. R. [и др.]. Epidemiology of pelvic ring fractures and injuries. 2017. № 3 (2). C. 260–269.
8. Davarinos N. [и др.]. Epidemiology of pelvic and acetabular trauma in a Dublin tertiary hospital: a 10-year experience. Irish Journal of Medical Science. 2012. № 2 (181). C. 243–246.
9. Elamin M. H. [и др.]. The epidemiology of pelvic ring fractures in Qatar. International Orthopaedics. 2024.
10. Esmer E. [и др.]. Influence of external pelvic stabilization on hemodynamically unstable pelvic fractures. Der Unfallchirurg. 2017. № 4 (120). C. 312–319.
11. Freitas C.D. [и др.]. There have been changes in the incidence and epidemiology of pelvic ring fractures in recent decades. Revista brasileira de ortopedia. 2013. № 6 (48). C. 475–481.
12. Leach S.E.T. [и др.]. Pelvic fractures: experience of pelvic ring fractures at a major trauma center. Clinical radiology. 2019. № 8 (74). C. 649.e19-649.e26.
13. Morgan O., Davenport D., Enright K. Pelvic injury is not just pelvic fracture. BMJ case reports. 2019. № 12 (12).
14. Nanninga G.L. [и др.]. Increasing rates of pelvic fractures among older adults: The Netherlands, 1986–2011. Age and Ageing. 2014. № 5 (43). C. 648–653.
15. Oberkircher L. [и др.]. Which factors influence treatment decision in fragility fractures of the pelvis? - results of a prospective study. BMC musculoskeletal disorders. 2021. № 1 (22).
16. Palmcrantz J. [и др.]. Pelvic fractures at a new level 1 trauma centre: who dies from pelvic trauma? The Inkosi Albert Luthuli Central Hospital experience. Orthopaedic surgery. 2012. № 4 (4). C. 216–221.
17. Pereira G.J.C. [и др.]. Epidemiology of pelvic ring fractures and injuries. Revista brasileira de ortopedia. 2017. № 3 (52). C. 260–269.
18. Prieto-Alhambra D. [и др.]. The burden of pelvis fracture: a population-based study of incidence, hospitalization and mortality. Osteoporosis International. 2012. № 12 (23). C. 2797–2803.
19. Rovere G. [и др.]. Epidemiology and etiology of male and female sexual dysfunctions related to pelvic ring injuries: a systematic review. International Orthopaedics. 2021. № 10 (45). C. 2687.
20. Ruatti S. [и др.]. Which pelvic ring fractures are potentially lethal? // Injury. 2015. № 6 (46). C. 1059–1063.
21. Yang A.P., Iannacone W.M. External fixation for pelvic ring disruptions. The Orthopedic clinics of North America. 1997. № 3 (28). C. 331–44.
Количество просмотров: 40
Категория статей:
Оригинальное исследование
Библиографическая ссылка
Efendiyeva E.I., Zhunusov Y.T., Mesova A.M., Zhaparova Zh.D., Tlemisov A.S. Pelvic injuries in Semey city: cross-sectional study // Nauka i Zdravookhranenie [Science & Healthcare]. 2025. Vol.27 (2), С.99-107. doi 10.34689/SH.2025.27.2.012Похожие публикации:
VIRAL HEPATITIS IN KAZAKHSTAN: REGIONAL EPIDEMIOLOGICAL OVERVIEW
PREDICTORS OF ANTIVIRAL THERAPY INEFFECTIVENESS IN CHRONIC HEPATITIS C: A MATCHED CASE-CONTROL STUDY IN ALMATY, A MAJOR METROPOLIS OF KAZAKHSTAN
МЕДИКО – СОЦИАЛЬНЫЕ ОСОБЕННОСТИ ПРИВЕРЖЕННОСТИ К ЛЕЧЕНИЮ БОЛЬНЫХ С ХРОНИЧЕСКИМ ПАНКРЕАТИТОМ
PATHOGENETIC ASSESSMENT OF CLINICAL AND INSTRUMENTAL PARAMETERS OF THE LUNGS IN PATIENTS WITH DIABETES MELLITUS
THE FREQUENCY AND EFFICACY ASSESSMENT OF RADIOIODINE THERAPY FOR DISTANT METASTASES OF THYROID CANCER