Online ISSN: 3007-0244,
Print ISSN:  2410-4280
RESULTS OF OPTIMIZATION OF AUTODERMOPLASTY WHEN TREATING GRANULATING PURULENT WOUNDS
Introduction. When treating granulating purulent wounds, some patients will need surgical interventions to restore the integrity of the skin. In this case, autodermoplasty using the split method occupies a special place. However, complete engraftment of the skin graft on the surface of the wound is not always possible. Purpose of the study. To evaluate the results of autodermograft engraftment in the treatment of granulating purulent wounds of various etiologies based on the intraoperative and postoperative wound management algorithm after free split autodermoplasty. Materials and methods of research. A total of 100 patients with granulating purulent wounds of various origins were treated under non-randomized clinical observation. In the main group, when treatment was used in 50 patients, an intraoperative and postoperative algorithm for wound management was developed after the use of free split autodermoplasty. The comparison group also included 50 patients who underwent traditional local treatment of wounds with autodermal graft using bandages. Research results. In general, graft engraftment by 7 days after autodermoplasty was assessed as complete engraftment of the graft in the main group of patients, and in the comparison group - partial engraftment to the recipient site. The best results were in the group of patients with granulating wounds of surgical and traumatic origin, the worst - with wounds after frostbite. Conclusion. When using the developed algorithm for intraoperative and postoperative management of granulating purulent wounds after autodermoplasty, the percentage of autodermograft engraftment increases both relative to the amount of autodermograft performed from 76% to 96% (χ2 = 6.728; p = 0.01), and relative to the area of the transplanted autodermograft from 77.34 ±0.33% to 96.06±0.2% (t = 48.51; p <0.05) compared with patients treated with traditional wound management with a 7.6-fold reduction in the chance of developing wound complications.
Sagit B. Imangazinov1, https: //orcid.org /0000-0002-8236-6246 Nazarbek B. Omarov2, http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6201-8263 Nursultan K. Andasbekov2, http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9958-3001 Yernar K. Kairkhanov1, http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7289-3272 Olga G. Tashtemirova1, http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7537-2808 Rustem S. Kazangapov1, http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1513-7432 Saule S. Imangazinova3, http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4848-5401 1 Pavlodar branch of «Semey Medical University» NJSC, Pavlodar, Republic of Kazakhstan;
1. Абрамов H.A., Жидков С.А., Кузьмин Ю.В. Кожная пластика в гнойной хирургии // Медицинские новости. 2000. №6. С. 53-56. 2. Алимжанов А.К., Головня М.А., Жамашев Д.К. Дерматомная аутодермопластика при обширных пострравматических гнойно-некротических ранах // Вестник КазНМУ. 2015. №1. С. 301-302. 3. Евтеев А.А., Тюрников Ю.И. Неудачи аутодермопластики. М. 2011. 160 с. 4. Имангазинов С.Б., Омаров Н.Б., Андасбеков Н.К и др. Оптимизация результатов лечения хирургических ран свободной аутодермопластикой. Обзор литературы // Наука и Здравоохранение. 2022. 6(Т.24). С. 170-186. 5. Имангазинов С.Б., Андасбеков Н.К., Канжигалин М.Г и др. Способ лечения глубоких ожоговых ран после аутодермопластики. Патент на изобретение KZ № 34472. 6. Шевлюк Н.Н., Гатиатуллин И.З., Стадников А.А. Особенности репаративных гистогенезов при использовании биопластических материалов // Журнал анатомии и гистопатологии. 2020, 9(1). С. 86-93. 7. Colen L.B., Pressa J.E., Potparic Z., Reus W.F. Reconstruction of the extremity with the dorsal thoracic fascia free flap // Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 1998. Vol. 101, N 3. Р. 738– 744. 8. Cruse P., Foord R. Тhe epidemiology of Wound infection // Surg. Clin. N. Amer. 1991. Vol. 60. № 1. P. 27-60. 9. Hafner J., Kühne A., Trüeb R.M. Successful grafting with Epi-Dex in pyoderma gangrenosum // Dermatology. 2006. Vol. 212, №3. P. 258-259. 10. Heitmann C., Pelzer M., Bickert B. et al. Chirurgische Konzeptund Ergebnissebei nekrotisierender Fasciitis. Der Chirurg. 2001. Vol.72. P. 168 – 173. 11. Mahmoud S.M., Mohamed A.A., Mahdi S.E., Ahmed M.E. Split skin graft in the management of diabetic foot ulcers // Journal of wound care. 2008. Vol. 17 (7). P. 303-306. 12. Naz I., Walters E., Akbari C.M. et al. Noninvasive Vascular Assessment of Lower Extremity Wounds in Diabetics: Are We Able to Predict Perfusion Deficits? // Surg.Technol. Int. 2017. Vol.12 (31). Р. 66-74. 13. Sen C., Gordillo G., Roy S., Kirsner R., Lambert R. Human skin wounds: a major and snowballing threat to public health and the economy // Wound Repair Regen. 2009. Vol.17 (6). P. 763-771. 14. Yamada N., Li W., Ihaya A., et al. Platelet-derived endothelial cell growth factor gene therapy for limb ischemia // Journal of Vascular Surgery. 2006. 44(6). P. 1322–1328. References: [1-6] 1. Abramov H.A., Zhidkov S.A., Kuz'min Ju.V. Kozhnaya plastika v gnoinoi khirurgii [Skin plasty in purulent surgery]. Meditsinskie novosti [Medical news]. 2000. №6. P. 53-56. [in Russian] 2. Alimzhanov A.K., Golovnja M.A., Zhamashev D.K. Dermatomnaja autodermoplastika pri obshirnyh postrravmaticheskih gnojno-nekroticheskih ranah [Dermatomal autodermoplasty for extensive post-traumatic purulent-necrotic wounds]. Vestnik KazNMU. [Bulletin of KazNMU]. 2015. №1. P. 301-302. [in Russian] 3. Evteev A.A., Tjurnikov Ju.I. Neudachi autodermoplastiki [Autodermoplasty failures]. M. 2011. 160 p. [in Russian] 4. Imangazinov S.B., Omarov N.B., Andasbekov N.K i dr. Optimizatciya rezul'tatov lecheniya khirurgicheskikh ran svobodnoi autodermoplastikoi. Obzor literatury. [Optimization of the results of treatment of surgical wounds with free autodermoplasty. Literature review]. Nauka i Zdravookhranenie. [Science and Health]. 2022. 6(T.24). P. 170-186. [in Russian] 5. Imangazinov S.B., Andasbekov N.K., Kanzhigalin M.G i dr. Sposob lecheniya glubokikh ozhogovykh ran posle autodermoplastiki. [Method for treating deep burn wounds after autodermoplasty]. Patent na izobretenie [Patent for invention] KZ № 34472. [in Russian] 6. Shevljuk N.N., Gatiatullin I.Z., Stadnikov A.A. Osobennosti reparativnyh gistogenezov pri ispol'zovanii bioplasticheskih materialov [Features of reparative histogenesis when using bioplastic materials]. Zhurnal anatomii i gistopatologii [Journal of Anatomy and Histopathology]. 2020, 9(1). P. 86-93. [in Russian]
Number of Views: 17

Key words:

Category of articles: Original articles

Bibliography link

Imangazinov S.B., Omarov N.B., Andasbekov N.K., Kairkhanov Ye.K., Tashtemirova O.G., Kazangapov R.S., Imangazinova S.S. Results of optimization of autodermoplasty when treating granulating purulent wounds // Nauka i Zdravookhranenie [Science & Healthcare]. 2024, (Vol.26) 1, pp. 102-108. doi 10.34689/SH.2024.26.1.013

Авторизируйтесь для отправки комментариев