Online ISSN: 3007-0244,
Print ISSN:  2410-4280
ANALYSIS OF THE PERCEPTION OF MEDICAL PROFESSIONALISM BY STUDENTS AND RESIDENTS OF FAMILY MEDICINE IN KAZAKHSTAN
Introduction. Professionalism is a core competency that all medical students must achieve throughout their studies. Clinical knowledge, good communication skills and an understanding of ethics form the basis of professionalism. Patients, medical societies and accrediting organizations expect future specialists to be professionals in their field, which in turn leads to the best clinical results. Currently, there are no studies devoted to the study of medical professionalism in the Republic of Kazakhstan. As a result, medical education in the Kazakhstani system has a limited perception of the concept of professionalism compared to many Western medical schools. The aim of this study is to analyze the perception of medical professionalism among students and residents of family medicine at the West Kazakhstan Marat Ospanov Medical University. Methods. А qualitative research method was used based on the content analysis methodology. A focus group discussion was held with 30 students and 24 residents of family medicine to gather participants' views and experiences in the field of medical professionalism. The received information was processed using the MAXQDA-2020 software package. Respondents were selected for the study based on their age, gender, and educational level. Results. The results of the conducted survey confirmed the respondents’ acknowledgement of the basic attributes of professionalism, such as medical knowledge and skills (more than 40% of the answers), personal and moral qualities of the doctor (more than 25% of the answers), respect for the interests of the patient (15% of the answers), the relationship between the doctor and the patient and among professionals themselves (15% of responses). Another important discovery of the survey was that students are 5 times more likely to define the relationship between a doctor and a patient in a model “respect for the interests of the patient” in comparison with residents of family medicine, who primarily reported responsibility and collegiality to be the basis for the development of professionalism and traditionally view doctor-patient relationship to be formed on the basis of paternalism defined by high degree of control over patients. This significant difference demonstrates a rift among specialists in the field of family medicine, which causes a lot of problems. For example, nowadays, professional family doctors regularly face the burnout problem due to many reasons and factors that force them to abandon their jobs. In addition to that, elements of professionalism such as reflective skills, time management and feedback collection were presented to the least extent (less than 1%) by both groups, which differs from the perception of the Western medical school and is a significant issue that needs to be solved. Conclusion. The qualitative nature of our study provides a detailed understanding of medical professionalism in the context of the Central Asian healthcare system, revealing many aspects that are inferior to the Western medical school counterparts and provides a solution, which is to teach the attributes and skills required for medical professionalism at all stages of medical education of family doctors.
Nurgul A. Abenova1, https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0395-9025 Bibigul K. Karimsakova1, https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8865-505X Anya N. Seipenova1, https://orcid.org/ 0000-0003-4568-6002 Gulnara Zh. Sakhipova1, https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9062-0697 Lazzat M. Zhamaliyeva1, https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3625-3651 Gulbakit K. Koshmaganbetova1, https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5895-346X 1 NCJSC “Marat Ospanov West Kazakhstan medical university”, Aktobe, Republic of Kazakhstan.
1. Приказ Министра здравоохранения Республики Казахстан от 15 декабря 2020 года № ҚР ДСМ-263/2020 “Об утверждении правил осуществления стратегического партнерства в сфере медицинского образования и науки”. https://adilet.zan.kz/rus/docs/V2000021811/links 2. Приказ Министра здравоохранения Республики Казахстан от 23 декабря 2020 года № ҚР ДСМ-319/2020. «Об утверждении Кодекса чести медицинских и фармацевтических работников Республики Казахстан». Зарегистрирован в Министерстве юстиции Республики Казахстан 24 декабря 2020 года № 21890 3. ABIM Foundation. American Board of Internal Medicine, ACP-ASIM Foundation. American College of Physicians-American Society of Internal Medicine, European Federation of Internal Medicine. Medical Professionalism in the New Millennium: A Physician Charter // Annals of Internal Medicine 2002; 136: 243-246. 4. Anon. Doctors in society: medical professionalism in a changing world. Report of a Working Party of the Royal College of Physicians of London. London: Royal College of Physicians of London; 2005. 5. Arnold L., Stern D.T. What is Medical Professionalism? In: Stern DT, editor. Measuring Medical Professionalism // New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 2006. pp. 15–37. 6. American Board of Internal Medicine. Project Professionalism. Philadelphia: ABIM, 1995. 7. Blank L., Kimball H., McDonald W., Merino J. Medical professionalism in the new millennium: a physician charter 15 months later // Ann Intern Med. 2003; 138(10): 839-841. 8. Boyatzis R. Transforming Qualitative Information: Thematic Analysis and code Development. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications; 1998. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221329809596155 9. Cuesta-Briand B., Auret K., Johnson P., Playford D. A world of difference’: a qualitative study of medical students’ views on professionalism and the ‘good doctor // BMC Med Educ. 2014;14:77. 10. Chandratilake M., McAleer S., Gibson J. Cultural similarities and differences in medical professionalism: a multi-region study // Med Educ. 2012;46:257–66. 11. Chua A.Z., Lo D.Y., Ho W.H., Koh Y.Q., Lim D.S., Tam J.K., Liaw S.Y., Koh G.C. The effectiveness of a shared conference experience in improving undergraduate medical and nursing students’ attitudes towards inter-professional education in an Asian country: a before and after study // BMC Med Ed. 2015;15:233. 12. Fehser J. Teaching professionalism: a student’s perspective // Mt Sinai J Med 2002; 69:412-4. 13. Finn G., Garner J., Sawdon M. ‘You’re judged all the time!‘students’ views on professionalism: a multicentre study // Med Educ. 2010;44:814–25. 14. Goold S.D., Lipkin M. The doctor–patient relationship // J Gen Intern Med. 1999;14(S1):26–33. 15. General Medical Council. Professionalism in action. // Good Medical Practice 2019; https://www.gmc-uk.org/ethical-guidance/ethical-guidance-for-doctors/good-medical-practice/professionalism-in-action. Accessed July 14, 2019. 16. Guba E, Lincoln Y. Fourth Generation Evaluation. Newbury Park, London, and New Delhi: Sage Publications; 1989. 17. Jha V., Bekker H., Duffy S., Roberts T. Perceptions of professionalism in medicine: a qualitative study //Med Educ. 2006;40:1027–36. 18. NEJM Knowledge+ Team. Exploring the ACGME core competencies: professionalism (Part 7 of 7). Accessed July 14, 2017. https://knowledgeplus.nejm.org/blog/acgme-core 19. Papadakis M.A., Paauw D.S., Hafferty F.W., Shapiro J., Byyny R.L. Perspective: the education community must develop best practices informed by evidence-based research to remediate lapses of professionalism // Acad Med. 2012;87(12):1694–1698. doi:10.1097/ACM.0b013e318271bc0b 20. Passi V., Doug M., Peile E., Thistlethwaite J., Johnson N. Developing medical professionalism in future doctors: a systematic re- view // Int J Med Educ. 2010; 1: 19-29. 21. Quill T.E., Brody H. Physician recommendations and patient autonomy: finding a balance between physician power and patient choice // Ann Intern Med. 1996;125:763–9. 22. Tong A., Sainsbury P., Craig J. Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): A 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups // Int J Qual Health Care. 2007;19(6):349-57. https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzm042 PMid:17872937 23. Van De Camp K., Vernooij-Dassen M.J, Grol R.P, Bottema B.J. How to conceptualize professionalism: a qualitative study // Med Teach. 2004;26:696–702. 24. Wagner P., Hendrich J., Moseley G., Hudson V. Defining medical professionalism: a qualitative study // Med Educ. 2007;41:288–94. 25. Zheng R.M, Sim Y.F, Koh G.C-H. Attitudes towards interprofessional collaboration among primary care physicians and nurses in Singapore // J Interpro Care. 2016;30:505–11. References: 1. Prikaz Ministra zdravookhraneniya Respubliki Kazakhstan ot 15 dekabrya 2020 goda № ҚR DSM-263/2020 “Ob utverzhdenii pravil osushchestvleniya strategicheskogo partnerstva v sfere meditsinskogo obrazovaniya i nauki” [Order of the Minister of Health of the Republic of Kazakhstan dated December 15, 2020 No. ҚР ДСМ-263/2020 “On approval of the rules for implementing strategic partnerships in the field of medical education and science”]. https://adilet.zan.kz/rus/docs/V2000021811/links 2. Prikaz Ministra zdravookhraneniya Respubliki Kazakhstan ot 23 dekabrya 2020 goda № ҚR DSM-319/2020. «Ob utverzhdenii Kodeksa chesti meditsinskikh i farmatsevticheskikh rabotnikov Respubliki Kazakhstan». Zaregistrirovan v Ministerstve yustitsii Respubliki Kazakhstan 24 dekabrya 2020 goda № 21890 [Order of the Minister of Health of the Republic of Kazakhstan dated December 23, 2020 No. ҚР ДСМ-319/2020. "On Approval of the Code of Honor of Medical and Pharmaceutical Workers of the Republic of Kazakhstan". Registered with the Ministry of Justice of the Republic of Kazakhstan on December 24, 2020 No. 21890.
Количество просмотров: 273

Ключевые слова:


Библиографическая ссылка

Abenova N.A., Karimsakova B.K., Seipenova A.N., Sakhipova G.ZhZhamaliyeva., L.M., Koshmaganbetova G.K. Analysis of the perception of medical professionalism by students and residents of family medicine in Kazakhstan // Nauka i Zdravookhranenie [Science & Healthcare]. 2022, (Vol.24) 4, pp. 61-69. doi 10.34689/SH.2022.24.4.008

Авторизируйтесь для отправки комментариев