ADAPTATION OF THE COSI METHODOLOGY TO THE CONDITIONS OF THE SCHOOL ENVIRONMENT AS A METHOD FOR ASSESSING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF MEASURES WITHIN THE FRAMEWORK OF THE WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION HEALTH-PROMOTING SCHOOLS
Objective: To adapt the methodology of the World Health Organization European Childhood Obesity Surveillance Initiative (COSI) to the school setting to evaluate the effectiveness of Health-promoting schools implementation measures through BMI indicators of children 8-10 years old in Kazakhstan as a basis for monitoring and influencing health promotion measures.
Methods. We adapted the data collection methodology of the World Health Organization European Childhood Obesity Surveillance Initiative to assess the effectiveness of a whole school approach through BMI scores in children aged 8-10 as a basis for monitoring and influencing health promotion measures. Using the method of a randomized controlled trial based on general education schools, we carried out anthropometric measurements of children before and after applying the whole school approach within the framework of the World Health Organization Concept of Healthy Schools.
Results. The number of students in the sample was 368 (boys n=172, 46.7%, girls n=196, 53.3%). Parents or legal representatives of children completed 349 family questionnaires, and the response rate was 77%. We conducted the study in three stages. In the first stage, the basic anthropometric parameters of children aged 8, 9, and 10 were measured, and a survey was conducted of parents and legal representatives of children. The second stage of the study consisted of calculating children's BMI, after which, in each age category, the children were divided into groups according to BMI. The overweight indicator is dominated in Nur-Sultan city, 12.24%, and East Kazakhstan region, 11.3% among children aged 10 years. There are more overweight children aged 9 (8.8%) and 10 (11.3%) in urban areas than rural areas. After the groups were formed, the school-wide approach of the HSS was applied. We also formed control groups for each weight status category. In the third stage of the study, we re-measured the anthropometric parameters of children in the experimental and control groups and calculated the BMI. In the Akmola region, normal weight indicators among children aged 8 grew by 3.27% and among children aged 10 by 0.6%.
Conclusions. The study's results showed the effectiveness of the COSI method in assessing one of the critical health indicators in childhood - weight status. The experimental group's results in achieving BMI thresholds in each weight status category were 41.4%, compared with the control group. Among underweight students, 39.7% reached the normal weight threshold. Regarding all ages, the BMI of overweight decreased by 21.4%. In turn, the adapted COSI tool is applicable to school settings to monitor weight status as one of the indicators of student health.
Akbota Abildina1, https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6791-6396
Assiya Turgambayeva1, https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2300-0105
Zhandulla Nakipov1, https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5528-693X
Gaukhar Dauletova1, https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1621-8149
Gaukhar Saurbayeva1 https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8614-0033
1 NJSC "Astana Medical University", Department of Public Health and Management,
Astana, Republic of Kazakhstan.
1. Analytical report on the implementation of the WHO project “Health-promoting schools” of the National Center for Healthy Lifestyles. National Center for Healthy Lifestyle . Nur-Sultan, 2017. Available from: https://hls.kz/?s=%D1%88%D1%81%D1%83%D0%B7 (accessed: 11.12.2022)
2. Analytical report on the implementation of the WHO project "Health-promoting schools" of the National Center for Public Health. National Center for Public Health. , 2018. стр. 54, Analytical report.Nur-Sultan. Available from: https://hls.kz/page/1?s=%D1%88%D1%81%D1%83%D0%B7(accessed: 11.12.2022)
3. Analytical information on the implementation of the WHO "Health Promoting Schools" project for 2022. National Center for Public Health. Dec 26, 2022. стр. 27. Nur-Sultan. Available from: https://hls.kz/archives/39792(accessed: 11.12.2022)
4. Abildina А. et al. Analysis of the equipment of school medical offices in the context of the studied regions in the Republic of Kazakhstan // J Health Dev. 2022, 4 (49), pp. 37-44. doi.org/10.32921/2225-9929-2022-4-49-37-44(accessed: 11.12.2022)
5. Breda J., McColl K., Buoncristiano M., et al. Methodology and implementation of the WHO European Childhood Obesity Surveillance Initiative (COSI). 2021 // Obesity Reviews. doi: 10.1111/obr.13215
6. Childhood obesity surveillance initiative: protocol. Copenhagen: WHO, 2016. Available from: Childhood Obesity Surveillance Initiative (COSI) (who.int) (accessed: 04.11.2022)
7. de Onis M., Onyango A.W., Borghi E., Siyam A., Nishida C., Siekmann J. Development of a WHO growth reference for school-aged children and adolescents // Bull World Health Organ. 2007 Sep;85(9):660-7. doi: 10.2471/blt.07.043497
8. Health Promotion International. Official Journal of the International Union for Health Promotion and Education Volume 21. December 1, 2006. Available from: https://www.afro.who.int/sites/default/files/2017-06/hpr%20The%20Bangkok%20Charter.pdf(accessed: 04.11.2022)
9. International Ethical Guidelines for Health-related Research Involving Humans, Fourth Edition. Geneva. Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences (CIOMS); 2016. Available from: https://cioms.ch/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/WEB-CIOMS-EthicalGuidelines.pdf(accessed: 05.11.2022)
10. International ethical guidelines for health-related research involving humans. Geneva : WHO, 2017. Available from: International Ethical Guidelines for Health-related Research Involving Humans, 2017 - PAHO/WHO | Pan American Health Organization(accessed: 02.11.2022)
11. Martin C.S., Wong A comparative study on resilience level between WHO health promoting schools and other schools among a Chinese population // Health Promotion International, Vol. 24 No. 2 # 19 March 2009. doi:10.1093/heapro/dap010
12. Physical status: the use and interpretation of anthropometry, Report of a WHO Expert Committee. Geneva: WHO, 1995. Available from: Physical status : the use of and interpretation of anthropometry , report of a WHO expert committee(accessed: 24.11.2022)
13. Ramos Salas et al. Parental Perceptions of Children’s Weight in 22 Countries. Obesity Facts 2021; 14:658–674. DOI: 10.1159/000517586
14. Rito A.I., Buoncristiano M., Spinelli A., Salanave B., Kunesova M., Hejgaard T. et al. Association between characteristics at birth, breastfeeding, and obesity in 22 countries: the WHO European childhood obesity surveillance initiative: COSI 2015/2017. Obes Facts.2019; 12: 226–43. DOI: 10.1159/000500425
15. The Bngkok Charter for Health Promotion in Globalized World. 2005. Available from: https://www.who.int/teams/health-promotion/enhanced-wellbeing/sixth-global-conference/the-bangkok-charter(accessed: 24.11.2022)
16. Sixtith World Health Assembly A60/18 22 March 2007 Promoting health in a globalized world Report by the Secretariat. 2007. Available from: Microsoft Word - WHASS1_R1_PRELIMS-en.doc (who.int) (accessed: 24.11.2022)
17. Stephen Whiting et al. Physical Activity, Screen Time, and Sleep Duration of Children Aged 6–9 Years in 25 Countries: An Analysis within the WHO European Childhood Obesity Surveillance Initiative (COSI) 2015–2017. Obes Facts 2021. 14:32–44. DOI: 10.1159/000511263
18. Waters at al.: Cluster randomized trial of a school community child health promotion and obesity prevention intervention: findings from the evaluation of fun ‘n healthy in Moreland! BMC Public Health (2018) 18:92. DOI 10.1186/s12889-017-4625-9
19. WHO European childhood obesity surveillance initiative- protocol. Copenhagen: WHO, 2010. Available from: https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/341189/WHO-EURO-2021-2495-42251-58349-eng.pdf(accessed: 14.11.2022)
20. WHO European childhood obesity surveillance initiative: protocol. Copenhagen : WHO, 2012 Oct. Available from: WHO European Childhood Obesity Surveillance Initiative (COSI) (accessed: 14.11.2022)
21. WHO. Childhood obesity surveillance initiative: protocol. Copenhagen : s.n., 2016. Available from: https://www.euro.who.int/__data/assets/pdf_file/0006/333906/COSI-procedures-en.pdf12. WHO. Childhood obesity surveillance initiative: protocol. Copenhagen : s.n., 2016. Available from: https://www.euro.who.int/__data/assets/pdf_file/0006/333906/COSI-procedures-en.pdf(accessed: 08.10.2022)
22. WHO European Childhood Obesity Surveillance Initiative (COSI) - data collection methods. Copenhagen Ø, Denmar : WHO Regional Office for Europe, October 2016. p. 37. Available from: WHO-EURO-2021-2495-42251-58349-eng.pdf(accessed: 08.10.2022)
23. 17. WHO Anthro Plus for personal computers manual: software for assessing growth of the world’s children and adolescents. Geneva : World Health Organization, 2009. Available from: Microsoft Word - who_anthroplus_manual6.doc(accessed: 08.11.2022)
24. WHO. Physical status: the use and interpretation of anthropometry, Report of a WHO Expert Committee . Geneva : World Health Organization, 1995. Available from: WHO_TRS_854.pdf(accessed: 07.10.2022)
25. Wijnhoven T, Branca F. WHO European childhood obesity surveillance initiative: protocol. Copenhagen : WHO, 2008. Protocol. Available from: https://www.euro.who.int/__data/assets/pdf_file/0018/333900/COSI-protocol-en.pdf(accessed: 08.10.2022)
26. Wolfenden et al.: A randomized controlled trial of an intervention to increase the implementation of a healthy canteen policy in Australian primary schools: study protocol. Implementation Science 2014 9:147. doi:10.1186/s13012-014-0147-3
Количество просмотров: 276
Категория статей:
Оригинальные исследования
Библиографическая ссылка
Abildina A., Turgambayeva A., Nakipov Zh., Dauletova G., Saurbayeva G. Adaptation of the COSI methodology to the conditions of the school environment as a method for assessing the effectiveness of measures within the framework of the World Health Organization that Health-promoting schools // Nauka i Zdravookhranenie [Science & Healthcare]. 2023, (Vol.25) 1, pp. 130-139. doi 10.34689/SH.2023.25.1.017Похожие публикации:
МЕХАНИКАЛЫҚ САРҒАЮ ОПЕРАЦИЯСЫ КЕЗІНДЕ КОАГУЛОПАТИЯЛЫҚ ҚАН КЕТУДІҢ АЛДЫН АЛУ ӘДІСІ
ОПТИМИЗАЦИЯ РЕЗУЛЬТАТОВ АУТОДЕРМОПЛАСТИКИ ПРИ ЛЕЧЕНИИ ГРАНУЛИРУЮЩИХ ГНОЙНЫХ РАН
BASICS OF REHABILITATION OF CHILDREN AFTER OPERATIONS ON THE COLON AND ANORECTAL AREA
HEALTH INDICATORS OF FIRST-YEAR-OF-LIFE CHILDREN IN THE REPUBLIC OF KAZAKHSTAN FOR 2013-2022
ОЦЕНКА УДОВЛЕТВОРЕННОСТИ ТРУДОВОЙ ДЕЯТЕЛЬНОСТЬЮ ВРАЧЕЙ АНЕСТЕЗИОЛОГОВ-РЕАНИМАТОЛОГОВ ГОРОДА АСТАНА