COMPARATIVE CHARACTERISTICS OF BREAST RECONSTRUCTION METHODS. LITERATURE REVIEW
Introduction. Breast cancer was the most frequently diagnosed cancer worldwide in 2020, with an estimated 2.26 million new cases. In Kazakhstan, breast cancer ranks first among newly diagnosed cancers, with 5,101 cases out of 39,077 in 2022. Radical mastectomy remains the most common surgical intervention, but the resulting physical and psychological consequences significantly affect patients' quality of life. Breast reconstruction is essential to restore physical and emotional well-being, yet its implementation in Kazakhstan remains limited.
Objective. To compare global breast reconstruction methods and assess their applicability and relevance in Kazakhstan.
Search strategy: A literature review was conducted using Web of Science and PubMed. Глубина поиска составила 5 лет. Reconstruction methods were divided into three groups: (1) tissue implants, (2) pedicle flaps, and (3) microsurgical free flaps. The methods were compared based on ease of implementation, cost effectiveness, recovery time, skill requirements, oncologic safety, and applicability to regional hospitals.
Results. Tissue implants provide shorter operative and recovery times but carry risks such as capsular contracture, implant migration, and higher infection rates, especially after radiation therapy. Pedicle flaps, including thoracodorsal and TRAM flaps, provide robust vascularization and sufficient tissue volume but are associated with donor site morbidity. Free flaps, especially DIEP, provide superior aesthetic results but require advanced microsurgical skills and longer operative times. Economic analysis revealed higher costs for implant-based reconstruction compared to flap-based methods.
Conclusion. Each breast reconstruction method has specific advantages and limitations. Implant-based reconstruction is faster but is expensive and prone to complications. Pedicle flaps are reliable and cost-effective, while free flaps provide the best aesthetic results but require specialized knowledge. Regional hospitals in Kazakhstan should focus on developing infrastructure and training programs to provide optimal breast reconstruction services.
Әнапия Бауржан Бегаліұлы – старший ординатор, Сектора опухолей кожи и мягких тканей, реконструктивной хирургии, ТОО Национальный Научный Онкологический Центр, г. Астана, Республика Казахстан. e-mail: alaydo@mail.ru, Тел.: 8 707 226 2728, https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2311-7861;
Ерекеш Аян Асылжанұлы - ТОО Национальный Научный Онкологический Центр, врач резидент по специальности «Пластическая хирургия взрослая, детская», г. Астана, Республика Казахстан. e-mail: ayerekeshov@gmail.com, https://orcid.org/0009-0001-1004-3608;
Жумабаев Мурат Болатович - врач анестезиолог, ТОО Национальный Научный Онкологический Центр, НАО «Медицинский университет Астана», г. Астана, Республика Казахстан. e-mail: jmb2003@mail.ru, Тел.: 8 701 792 5707, https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2405-4447;
Саменова Динара Ермековна - старший ординатор, Сектор маммологии, ТОО Национальный Научный Онкологический Центр, г. Астана, Республика Казахстан. e-mail: samenova_87@mail.ru, https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2319-1458;
Джангалиев Даулет Толепович - ассистент профессора, НАО «Карагандинский медицинский Университет», г. Караганда, Республика Казахстан. e-mail: Djan_ochlb@mail.ru, https://orcid.org/0009-0000-9351-2838;
Бейбіт Әнет Бейбітұлы - врач хирург, Сектор опухолей кожи и мягких тканей, реконструктивной хирургии, ТОО Национальный Научный Онкологический Центр, г. Астана, Республика Казахстан, e-mail: beibitanet@gmail.com, Тел.: 8 707 389 5594, https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5015-7263;
Куаныш Жулдыз Маратқызы - магистр, исследователь, e-mail: zhuldyzkuanysh@icloud.com, Тел.:87058283096, https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9578-4236, ТОО «Национальный научный онкологический центр», г. Астана Республика Казахстан;
Автор-корреспондент:
Манатова Альмира Манатқызы - PhD, ведущий специалист отдела науки, ТОО «Национальный научный онкологический центр», г. Астана, Республика Казахстан.
Почтовый адрес: Республика Казахстан, 010000, г. Астана, ул. Керей и Жанибек хандар 3.
E-mail: m.almira@cancercenter.kz
Телефон: 8 702 880 20 22
1. Государственные закупки. URL: https://cancercenter.edu.kz/index.php/ru/gosudarstvennye-zakupki/protokol-5-ob-itogakh-zakupa-ls-i-mi-sposobom-ztsp-na-2023-god-207-lot (дата обращения: 01.07.2024).
2. Приказ Министра здравоохранения Республики Казахстан от 10 февраля 2021 года № ҚР ДСМ-17. О внесении изменений в приказ исполняющего обязанности Министра здравоохранения Республики Казахстан от 30 октября 2020 года № ҚР ДСМ-170/2020 "Об утверждении тарифов на медицинские услуги, предоставляемые в рамках гарантированного объема бесплатной медицинской помощи и (или) в системе обязательного социального медицинского страхования" URL: https://adilet.zan.kz/rus/docs/V2100022190 (дата обращения: 01.07.2024)
3. Протокол «Рак молочной железы» (КП РК, 2022). URL: https://diseases.medelement.com/disease/%D1%80%D0%B0%D0%BA%D0%BC%D0%BE% (дата обращения: 01.07.2024).
4. Статистический сборник Здоровье населения республики Казахстан и деятельность организаций здравоохранения в 2023 году. URL: https://www.gov.kz/memleket/entities/dsm/documents/details/681761 (дата обращения: 01.07.2024).
5. Adib Bin Rashid, Mahima Haque, Mohaimenul S.M. Islam, Rafi K.M., Uddin Labib. Nanotechnology-enhanced fiber-reinforced polymer composites: Recent advancements on processing techniques and applications. Heliyon. 2024. Vol. 10, Issue 2. e24692. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e24692.
6. Ahn H.C., Seo H.J., Chang S.Y. et al. Technique for the prevention of hernia after pedicled transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous flap for breast reconstruction. Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery. 2022. Т.75, №1. С.439–488. DOI:10.1016/j.bjps.2021.09.041
7. Ali F., Kalva S.N., Koc M. Advancements in 3D printing techniques for biomedical applications: a comprehensive review of materials consideration, post processing, applications, and challenges. Discovery Materials. 2024. Vol. 4, Issue 53. DOI: 10.1007/s43939-024-00115-4
8. American Society of Plastic Surgeons. Breast Augmentation Cost. URL: https://www.plasticsurgery.org/cosmetic-procedures/breast-augmentation/cost (дата обращения: 01.07.2024).
9. Amro C., Sorenson T.J., Boyd C.J., et al. The Evolution of Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction: Innovations, Trends, and Future Directions. J Clin Med. 2024. Dec 5. Vol. 13, №23. С. 7407. DOI:10.3390/jcm13237407.
10. Azoury S.C., Wu L.C. Preoperative evaluation and planning for breast reconstruction following mastectomy. Plastic Surgery. 5-е изд. 2023. С. 222–223
11. Ben Aziz M., Rose J. Breast Reconstruction Perforator Flaps [Электронный ресурс]. [Updated 2023 Jul 24]. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; URL: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK565866/.
12. Benanti E., De Santis G., Leti Acciaro A., et al. Soft tissue coverage of the upper limb: A flap reconstruction overview. Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2020. Nov 6. Vol. 60. С. 338–343. DOI: 10.1016/j.amsu.2020.10.069.
13. Berlin N.L., Chung K.C., Matros E., et al. The Costs of Breast Reconstruction and Implications for Episode-Based Bundled Payment Models. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2020. Dec. Vol. 146, №6. С. 721e–730e. DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000007329.
14. Chakari W., Bille C., Lilja C., Thomsen J.B. Combined perforator flaps for total breast reconstruction - a narrative review and insights from massive weight loss cases. Gland Surg. 2024. Vol. 13, №5. С. 760–774. DOI: 10.21037/gs-23-397.
15. Chen K., Beeraka N.M., Sinelnikov M.Y., et al. Patient Management Strategies in Perioperative, Intraoperative, and Postoperative Period in Breast Reconstruction With DIEP-Flap: Clinical Recommendations. Frontiers in Surgery. 2022. Т.9. Ст. 729181. DOI:10.3389/fsurg.2022.729181
16. Cohen Z., Azoury S. C., Matros E., Nelson J. A., Allen R.J. Modern Approaches to Alternative Flap-Based Breast Reconstruction: Profunda Artery Perforator Flap. Clinical Plastic Surgery. 2023. Т. 50, № 2. С. 289–299. DOI: 10.1016/j.cps.2022.10.001.
17. Danilla S.V., Jara R.P., Miranda F., et al. Is Banning Texturized Implants to Prevent Breast Implant-Associated Anaplastic Large Cell Lymphoma a Rational Decision? A Meta-Analysis and Cost-Effectiveness Study. Aesthetic Surgery Journal. 020. Т.40, №7. С. 721–731. DOI: 10.1093/asj/sjz343
18. Dejean M. F., Dabi Y., Goutard M., Taveau C.B., Lantieri L.A., Lellouch A.G. Deep inferior epigastric perforator free flap in elderly women for breast reconstruction: The experience of a tertiary referral center and a literature review. Breast Journal. 2021. Т. 27. С. 700–705. DOI: 10.1111/tbj.14273.
19. Deo S.V.S., Sharma J., Kumar C., Seenu V. Overview of Breast Reconstruction. Breast Oncoplasty and Reconstruction Principles and Practice. 2023. С. 179–181. DOI: 10.1007/9789819955367_24.
20. Hamed E.E., Zaky M., Abdallah A., et al. Preoperative Duplex Perforator Mapping of TDAP Flap in Breast Reconstruction. Surgical Chronicles. 2023. Т. 28, №2. С. 153–156.
21. Hansson E., Brorson F., Löfstrand J., et al. Systematic review of cost-effectiveness in breast reconstruction: deep inferior epigastric perforator flap vs. implant-based breast reconstruction. Journal of Plastic Surgery and Hand Surgery. 2024. Т. 59. DOI: 10.2340/jphs.v59.19649
22. Hölmich L.R., Sayegh F., Salzberg C. A. Immediate or delayed breast reconstruction: the aspects of timing, a narrative review. Annals of Breast Surgery. 2023. Т. 7. С. 6.
23. Huang Y.C., Huang Y.C., Ding S.J. Primary stability of implant placement and loading related to dental implant materials and designs: A literature review. Journal of Dental Sciences. 2023. Т.18, № 4. С. 1467–1476. DOI: 10.1016/j.jds.2023.06.010.
24. Jagasia P., Torres-Guzman R.A., Dash E., et al. Meta-analysis of 2059 patients assessing early discharge after DIEP flap breast reconstruction: Comprehensive outcomes before post-operative day 5. Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery. 2024. Т. 99. С. 230–237. DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2024.09.081.
25. Kaidar-Person O., Offersen B. V., Boersma L. J., de Ruysscher D., Tramm T., Kühn T., Gentilini O., Mátrai Z., Poortmans P. A multidisciplinary view of mastectomy and breast reconstruction: Understanding the challenges. Breast. 2021. Т. 56. С. 42–52. DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2021.02.004.
26. Kania K., Chang D. K., Abu-Ghname A., Reece E. M., Chu C. K., Maricevich M., Buchanan E. P., Winocour S. Microsurgery Training in Plastic Surgery. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open. 2020. Т. 8, № 7. С. e2898. DOI: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000002898.
27. Kidd T., McCabe G., Tait J., Kulkarni D. Implant reconstruction after mastectomy: A review and summary of current literature. Cancer Treatment and Research Communications. 2024. Vol. 40. P. 100821. ISSN 2468-2942. DOI: 10.1016/j.ctarc.2024.100821.
28. Li Y., Wang X., Thomsen J. B., Nahabedian M. Y., Ishii N., Rozen W. M., Long X., Ho Y.S. Research trends and performances of breast reconstruction: a bibliometric analysis. Annals of Translational Medicine. 2020. Т. 8, № 22. С. 1529. DOI: 10.21037/atm-20-3476.
29. Losa-Martin O., Fernandez-Quesada S., Landin L. Free fillet flap: Outcomes in emergency microsurgical reconstruction of upper and lower limb. Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery. 2024. Т. 99. С. 445–453. DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2024.10.018
30. Makki A., Thomsen J.B., Gunnarsson G.L., et al. A cost-effectiveness analysis of delayed breast reconstruction with pedicled flaps from the back. Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery. 2022. Т. 75, №7. С. 2211–2218. DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2022.02.034.
31. Marchica P., Oieni S., David M. et al. Latissimus Dorsi Flap and Thoracodorsal Artery Perforator Flap with Immediate Fat Transfer (LIFT and TIFT): A Retrospective Study about Total Breast Reconstruction in High-Risk Patients. Aesthetic Plastic Surgery. 2024. Т. 48, №9. С. 1745–1758. DOI: 10.1007/s00266-023-03528-3.
32. Mayer H.F., Coloccini A., Viñas J.F. Three-Dimensional Printing in Breast Reconstruction: Current and Promising Applications. J Clin Med. 2024. Т. 13, № 11. С. 3278. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13113278.
33. Meade M., DiCiurcio W., Radack T., Michael M., Woods B. Reference Managers. Clin Spine Surg. 2024. Т. 37, №2. С. 77–78. DOI: 10.1097/BSD.0000000000001532.
34. Meshkin D.H., Firriolo J.M., Karp N.S., Salibian A.A. Management of complications following implant-based breast reconstruction: a narrative review. Ann Transl Med. 2023. Т. 11, № 12. С. 416. DOI: 10.21037/atm-23-1384.
35. Mu X., Zhang J., Jiang Y. 3D Printing in Breast Reconstruction: From Bench to Bed. Front Surg. 2021. Т. 8. С. 641370. DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2021.641370.
36. Nahabedian M.Y. Introduction to autologous reconstruction with alternative free flaps. Plastic Surgery. 5-е изд. 2023. 600c.
37. Neligan P.C. Useful Flaps for Plastic Surgeons to Know. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. 2023. Т. 151, №1. С. 148E–157E. DOI:10.1097/PRS.0000000000009765
38. Page M.J., McKenzie J.E., Bossuyt P.M., et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2021. Т.372. С. n71. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.n71.
39. Park J.H., Park J.U., Chang H. Advances in Biomaterials for Breast Reconstruction. Applied Sciences. 2021. Т. 11, № 16. С. 7493. DOI: 10.3390/app11167493.
40. Patel N.G., Ramakrishnan V. Microsurgical Tissue Transfer in Breast Reconstruction. Clinics in Plastic Surgery. 2020. Т.47, №4. С. 595–609. DOI:10.1016/j.cps.2020.06.010
41. Ramezani M., Ripin Z.M. An Overview of Enhancing the Performance of Medical Implants with Nanocomposites. Journal of Composites Science. 2023. Т. 7, № 5. С. 199. DOI: 10.3390/jcs7050199.
42. Regan J.P., Casaubon J.T. Breast Reconstruction [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; URL:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK470317/.
43. Rocco N., Catanuto G.F., Accardo G., et al. Implants versus autologous tissue flaps for breast reconstruction following mastectomy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024. Т.10, №10. CD013821. DOI:10.1002/14651858.CD013821.pub2.
44. Roy N., Downes M.H., Ibelli T. et al. The psychological impacts of post-mastectomy breast reconstruction: a systematic review. Ann Breast Surg. 2024. Т. 8. С. 19.
45. Sachs D., Winters R. Unipedicled Tram Breast Reconstruction [Internet]. [Обновлено: 2023 Jul 4]. In: StatPearls. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; URL: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK436009/.
46. Semenova Y., Lim L., Salpynov Z., et al. Historical evolution of healthcare systems of post-soviet Russia, Belarus, Kazakhstan I dr.: A scoping review. Heliyon. 2024. Т.10, №8. e29550. DOI:10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e29550.
47. Shah S.A., Bloom J.A., Long E.A., Chatterjee A., Lee B.T. ASO Author Reflections: Staged Autologous Reconstruction is Cost-Effective in Irradiated Fields. Annals of Surgical Oncology. 2023. Т. 30, №2. С. 1084–1085. DOI: 10.1245/s10434-022-12624-8.
48. Simion L., Petrescu I., Chitoran E., et al. Breast Reconstruction following Mastectomy for Breast Cancer: Therapeutic Options and Results. Life. 2024. Т. 14, № 1. С. 138. DOI: 10.3390/life14010138.
49. Sisk G.C., Chao A.H. Advances in Autologous Breast Reconstruction. Current Surgery Reports. 2021. Т. 9, №1. С. 2. DOI: 10.1007/s40137-020-00280-4
50. Song W.J., Kang S.G., Kim E.K., et al. Current status of and trends in post-mastectomy breast reconstruction in Korea. Arch Plast Surg. 2020. Т. 47, № 2. С. 118–125. DOI: 10.5999/aps.2019.01676.
51. Sung H., Ferlay J., Siegel R.L., Laversanne M., Soerjomataram I., Jemal A., Bray F. Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021. Т. 71, № 3. С. 209-249. DOI: 10.3322/caac.21660.
52. Tomita K., Kubo T. Recent advances in surgical techniques for breast reconstruction. Int J Clin Oncol. 2023. Т. 28, № 7. С. 841-846. DOI: 10.1007/s10147-023-02313-1.
53. Vindigni V., Marena F., Zanettin C., Bassetto F. Breast Reconstruction: The Oncoplastic Approach. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2024. Т. 13, №16. Ст. 4718. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13164718.
54. Virzì D., Caruso F., Castiglione G., et al. Thoraco-dorsal artery perforator flap for totally autologous primary breast reconstruction. European Journal of Surgical Oncology. 2023. Т. 49, № 11. С. 106988. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2023.106988.
55. WHO. Guidelines for the Management Of Breast Cancer. https://applications.emro.who.int/dsaf/dsa510.pdf (дата обращения: 01.07.2024).
56. Wignarajah P., Malata C.M., Benson J.R. Oncoplastic and reconstructive breast surgery. Front Oncol. 2023. Т. 13. Ст. 1176915. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1176915.
57. Wilkinson L., Gathani T. Understanding breast cancer as a global health concern. Br J Radiol. 2022. Т. 95, № 1130. Ст. 20211033. DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20211033.
58. Xu H., Xu B. Breast cancer: Epidemiology, risk factors and screening. Chinese Journal of Cancer Research. 2023. Т. 35, №6. С. 565-583. DOI: 10.21147/j.issn.1000-9604.2023.06.02
59. Yang P., Ju Y., Hu Y., et al. Emerging 3D bioprinting applications in plastic surgery. Biomater Res. 2023. Т. 27, № 1. DOI: 10.1186/s40824-022-00338-7.
60. Yesantharao P. S., Nguyen D. H. Hybrid breast reconstruction: a systematic review of current trends and future directions. Ann Breast Surg. 2022.Т. 6. С. 17.
61. Youssif S., Hassan Y., Tohamy A., Eid S., Ashour T., Malahias M., Khalil H. Pedicled local flaps: a reliable reconstructive tool for partial breast defects. Gland Surg. 2019. Т. 8, № 5. С. 527-536. DOI: 10.21037/gs.2019.09.06.
62. Zhu L., Zhu J., Qian Y., Jiang H. Reduced capsular contracture with smooth and textured breast implants following submuscular mammoplasty: systematic literature review. Future Oncol. 2021. Т. 17, № 36. С. 5177-5187. DOI: 10.2217/fon-2021-0510.
Number of Views: 22
Category of articles:
Reviews
Bibliography link
Anapiya B.B., Erekesh A.A., Manatova A.M., Zhumabayev M.B., Samenova D.E., Dzhangaliev D.T., Beibit A.B., Kuanysh Zh.M. Comparative characteristics of breast reconstruction methods. Literature review // Nauka i Zdravookhranenie [Science & Healthcare]. 2024. Vol.26 (6), pp. 132-141. doi 10.34689/SH.2024.26.6.016Related publications:
CURRENT STATE OF DERMATOPHYTE RESISTANCE TO ANTIMYCOTIC AGENTS
THE ROLE OF BIOMEDICAL INFORMATICS IN THE STUDY OF BRONCHOPULMONARY DYSPLASIA
THE IMPORTANCE OF VISUAL SCREENING FOR LUNG CANCER
DIAGNOSIS AND TREATMENT OF KIDNEY TRANSPLANT REJECTION: A LITERATURE REVIEW.
COMPARATIVE CHARACTERISTICS OF BREAST RECONSTRUCTION METHODS. LITERATURE REVIEW